Contact us   Feedback   Annual Subscription   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

2015 (9) TMI 345 - SUPREME COURT

2015 (9) TMI 345 - SUPREME COURT - 2015 (323) E.L.T. 450 (SC) - Mis-declaration of country of origin Imposition of duties, fines and penalty Commissioner vide order imposed duties, redemption fine and penalty Tribunal set aside order of Commissioner after re-appreciating entire evidence Whether tribunal is right in setting aside order imposing duties, fines and penalty Held that:- no material was produced by Department to indicate payment by assesse importer on basis of such alleged in .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ay be futile Therefore, appeal dismissed as no question of law involved Decided against Revenue. - Civil Appeal No(s). 1874/2006 - Dated:- 21-8-2015 - Mr. A.k. Sikri and Mr. Rohinton Fali Nariman, JJ. For the Petitioner : Ms. Pinky Anand, ASG, Mr. Yashank Adhyaru, Sr.Adv., Mr. B. Krishna Prasad, Adv., Ms. Binu Tamta, Adv., Mr. Rajiv Nanda, Adv. For the Respondent : Mr. Alok Yadav,Adv., Mr. Somnath Shukla,Adv., Mr. Udit Jain,Adv., Mr. Praveen Kumar,Adv. ORDER We have heard the learned counsel .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

l (hereinafter referred to as "the Tribunal") which has set aside the order of the Commissioner after re-appreciating the entire evidence. We find that the Tribunal has given cogent reasons in arriving at the conclusion that the Department could not produce any credible evidence or ante-proof to the evidence in the show cause notice. We may only state this position in summary manner in respect of each firm. The Commissioner in his Order-in-Original confirmed the demand of customs duty .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

flict in the status of Mr. Puri wherein at one stage he projects himself to be the partner in M/s. Pearl Industrial Company, whereas thereafter he states that he is merely an interpreter. The Panchnama dated 09.11.1997 raises a presumption against Mr. Puri and since search was completed merely in 90 minutes, he being an impartial and biased witness, his statement cannot be relied upon, more so when no opportunity to cross-examine was granted to the assessee despite requests. The trade declaratio .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ong Customs Authorities and on the basis of the alleged invoices. The Tribunal has set aside the demand by giving the findings that the documents are not authentic. Letter does not indicate whether the two invoices allegedly received by the Department showing the higher amounts, were signed or not. The date of alleged invoice is subsequent to the date of shipment indicated in the bill of the lading. The invoices of the importer bear notification stamps of Bank indicating processing of payments. .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 



|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version