New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

2015 (9) TMI 368 - CESTAT NEW DELHI

2015 (9) TMI 368 - CESTAT NEW DELHI - 2015 (40) S.T.R. 750 (Tri. - Del.) - Admission of additional evidence - Classification of service - Advertising agency service or Renting of immovable property - appellants have contended that they were not providing any advertising agency service and were in fact renting space from Railways which they used to further give on rent - Held that:- Commissioner (Appeals) referred to Rule 5 of the Central Excise (Appeals) Rules, 2001 and held that additional evid .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

nt that they were only renting out the space which they themselves rented from the Railways and were not providing any advertising agency service. - in the interest of justice additional evidence in support of the appellants' aforesaid contention should be admitted - matter remanded back - Decided in favor of assessee. - Service Tax Appeal No. 269 of 2009 - Final Order No. ST/A/51390/2015-CU(DB) - Dated:- 9-4-2015 - G Raghuram, President And R K Singh, Member (T),JJ. For the Appellant : Shri Sud .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

did not pay service tax during the period 2006-07. 2. The appellants have contended that they were not providing any advertising agency service and were in fact renting space from Railways which they used to further give on rent. They were not providing any design or material etc. and therefore were not covered under the advertising agency service. They stated that the service rendered by them would be covered under renting of immovable property service which were not taxable during the period .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ngaged in providing any service connected with making, preparation, display or exhibition of advertisement. It is seen that in the case of CCE vs. Azad Publication 2004 (167) ELT 59 (Tri. Del.) it was held that permitting display of advertisement on its site and raising bill for realising rental charges was not covered under advertising agency service. Similarly, in the case of CCE vs. The Incoda 2004 (174) ELT 65 (Tri. Kol), it was held that respondent hired space in Metro Railway coaches and i .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

e impugned order has changed/ twisted their ground for non payment of service tax that they were getting space from Railways and let out the said space to different clients for displaying their advertisement for specific period for which they were getting rent from their customers and letting of space does not fall under the category of Advertising Agency services and accordingly not chargeable to service tax whereas during the investigation stage or adjudication stage, the appellant has not sub .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 



|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version