2014 (4) TMI 1078

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... for E. I. Sanmathi for the respondent. ORDER This civil revision petition under section 15A of the Karnataka Tax on Entry of Goods Act, 1979 (for short, "the Act") is preferred against the order dated July 12, 2010 rendered by the Karnataka Appellate Tribunal, Bangalore (for short, "the Tribunal") in STA No. 1066 of 1999 whereby the Tribunal allowed the appeal and set aside the orders passed by .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... 002 ?" Mr. T. K. Vedamurthy, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, at the outset, inviting our attention to the judgment of this court in State of Karnataka v. R. K. Powergen Pvt. Ltd., Hiriyur, Chitradurga District reported in [2012] 56 VST 193 (Karn); [2012] 74 KLJ 279(HC) (DB) submitted that the questions of law raised in this petition are squarely covered by the said judgment. Mr. E. .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... e deals in. The Tribunal has not considered the appeal in proper perspective as to whether those machines are covered by Notification No. FD 11 CET 2002, dated March 30, 2002. From bare perusal of the order of the Tribunal, in particular paragraph 10 thereof, we are also satisfied that the Tribunal has not made any distinction between the machines and tools, such as grinding and cutting wheel and .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X