GST Helpdesk   Subscription   Demo   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

2015 (9) TMI 1014 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD

2015 (9) TMI 1014 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD - 2016 (333) E.L.T. 351 (Tri. - Ahmd.) - Refund of SAD / Additional Duty - Validity of Sale transaction Entitlement of Exemption benefit Adjudicating authority sanctioned refund claim of 4% additional duty Commissioner (Appeals) dismissed appeal against Adjudication order on ground that refund sanctioned was not in violation of condition of Notification No.102/2007-Cus as Respondents had made sale transactions only on paper Held that:- from agreement .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

eme Court in case of M/s Vadilal Chemicals Ltd Vs State of Andhra Pradesh [2005 (8) TMI 121 - SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] held that eligibility to exemption determined by prescribed method should not be denied based on other criteria No dispute that Respondents paid additional duty of customs and also paid VAT therefore, benefit of exemption notification cannot be denied Decided against revenue. - Appeal No. C/11025/2014-DB; C/Cross/13352/2014 - Order No. A/10532 / 2015 - Dated:- 7-5-2015 - Hon .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

nt at Udham Singh Nagar, Uttarakhand. The Respondent has been retained as EPC contractor through International Competition Bidding process, agreed to do erection, procurement and commissioning of the said plant. The Respondents imported a consignment described as Gas Turbine and Generator Unit & MSD Unit 1 & 2, Lubricants, Inlet Support/Steel Structure paid additional duty of customs (4% CVD) as per Section 3(5) of the Customs Tariff Act, 1975 at the time of importation. The goods were s .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

nctioned in violation of condition of Notification No.102/2007-Cus (supra) as the Respondents had made the sale transactions only on paper. By the impugned order, the Commissioner (Appeals) rejected the appeal filed by the Revenue. Hence, the Revenue filed this appeal. 2. The learned Authorised Representative for the Revenue submits that refund of Customs duty is eligible on SAD for sale of the said goods. There was no sale transaction between the Respondents and GIPL. It is revealed from the co .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

low the purchase price. He reiterates the grounds of appeal filed by the Revenue. 3. The learned Counsel on behalf of the Respondent drew the attention of the Bench to the relevant portion of the agreement to establish that the Respondents passed the title of the goods to M/s GIPL by raising invoices. He also placed the certificate issued by the Government of NCT of Delhi, Department of Trade & Taxes, New Delhi, certifying that the Respondents sold the goods to M/s GIPL and paid CST. He furt .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

of Customs leviable under Section 3 (5) of the Customs Tariff Act. The exemption shall be given, if the following conditions are fulfilled:- (a) the importer of the said goods shall pay all duties, including the said additional duty of customs leviable thereon, as applicable, at the time of importation of the goods; (b) the importer, while issuing the invoice for sale of the said goods, shall specifically indicate in the invoice that in respect of the goods covered therein, no credit of the addi .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ocument evidencing payment of the said additional duty; (ii) invoices of sale of the imported goods in respect of which refund of the said additional duty is claimed; (iii) documents evidencing payment of appropriate sales tax or value added tax, as the case may be, by the importer, on sale of such imported goods. The jurisdictional customs officer shall sanction the 3. refund on satisfying himself that the conditions referred to in para 2 above, are fulfilled. 5. The main contention of the lear .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

IPL decided to set up a power plant in Khasra, Uttarakhand. The Appellant is engaged in the business of undertaking procurement of supply of power plant equipment and GIPL desired to purchase certain equipments and materials. The Respondents passed the title of the goods and certificates to the project authority by raising invoices. For the proper appreciation of the case, the relevant portion of the order of Commissioner (Appeal) are reproduced below:- 5.3 The chart clearly reveals that with or .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

es, created a confusion which resulted in this appeal. Thus, I find no merit in the objection raised by the appellant-department in this regard. 6. Appellant-department has also argued that the CA has issued his certificate without verification of records to facilitate the respondent for filing refund claim in time. This was mainly due to the aforesaid allegation that CST was paid only after filing of the refund claim whereas the CA certificate certifies payment of CST beforehand. In view of the .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

domestic airport, packing charges for seaworthy transportation of equipments, transit insurance included on the supplies made on CIF basis and all applicable taxes/duties. Further, Article 10.2 which deals with the terms of shipment and title of the equipments, specifies that notwithstanding which party has title, care custody and control of the equipment and loss or damage thereto shall remain with the supplier (respondent) until passed to the buyer at the delivery point. The term delivery poi .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

panied by the supporting documents set forth in Appendix B hereto, to the agent corporate. Therefore, buyer assumes no responsibility for early payments for supplies or import duties, which in the aggregate, on a quarterly basis, exceed the cumulative total amounts shown in Appendix B, supplier shall provide the buyer at least 25 (twenty five) days prior notice of such early shipment.... 7.4 Respondent has also submitted that Bank of Baroda has financed the power project of their buyer with a pr .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

the hearing, which supports their contentions. The letter indicates that the bank deputes their engineer to the project site for periodical inspection of all equipments and the progress of the project before disbursing phased installments of the loan. 7.5 A closer scrutiny of all these documents support their submissions made by the respondent that despite their responsibility for implementation of the whole power project till its final stage of commissioning and final running, the title and ca .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

he project. I have also examined as to what constitutes sale in terms of The Central Sales Tax Act, 1956. The definition of the term sale as defined under Section 2(g) of the said CST Act states:- sale , with its grammatical variations and cognate expressions, means any transfer of property in goods by one person to another for cash or for deferred payment or for any other valuable consideration, and includes a transfer of goods on the hire-purchase or other system of payment by installments, bu .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ich I find reasonable and acceptable. I find that this objection is trivial and has no relevance to the admissibility of refund of 4% SAD as provided under Notification No.102/2007 (supra), once details of goods in the BOE and details of goods in the sales match completely. 6. We find that the sales tax authorities accepted the sale of the goods on the basis of invoices and confirmed the payment of CST. It is revealed from the agreement that the title of the goods was transferred to M/s GIPL as .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

omain of the sale and purchase of the two parties, which are common in nature. It is noted that the sales tax authorities accepted the sale of the goods on the basis of invoices produced by the Respondents. The exemption Notification No.102/2007-Cus stipulates the condition for availing the exemption and determined the prescribed method which were fulfilled by the Respondent. The Hon ble Supreme Court in the case of M/s Vadilal Chemicals Ltd Vs State of Andhra Pradesh 2005 (192) ELT 33 (SC) held .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

n by the Department of Industries & Commerce by issuing an Eligibility Certificate. There was no other method prescribed under the scheme for determining an industrial unit s eligibility for the benefits granted. The Department of Industries & Commerce having exercised its mind, and having granted the final eligibility certificate (which was valid at all material times), the Commercial Taxes Department could not go beyond the same. More so when the Commissioner, Sales Tax had accepted th .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 



|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version