Contact us   Feedback   Annual Subscription   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

2015 (9) TMI 1055 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT

2015 (9) TMI 1055 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT - [2015] 378 ITR 677 (Kar) - Disallowance of interest on borrowed loan - Held that:- In the instant case, though the borrowed money was advanced in favour of the sister concern of the assessee in the year 1999-2000, the sister concern has also not utilized the said amount for the said purpose. Even after three years, the said project has not been commenced, however the sister concern has diverted the said amount for some other project.The Tribunal, after .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

stantial questions of law framed in these appeals are answered against the assessee - ITA Nos. 465 & 720-721 of 2009 (IT) - Dated:- 8-9-2015 - Vineet Saran And B. Manohar, JJ. For the Petitioner : Sri A Shankar & M Lava, Advs For the Respondents : Sri K V Aravind & Sri G Kamaladhar, Advs JUDGMENT The assessee has preferred these appeals under Section 260-A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act' for short) being aggrieved by the common order dated 08-05- .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ship firm which is in the business of real estate and construction of commercial and residential complexes. It has filed its return of income for the assessment years 2000-01 to 2002-03. The Assessing Officer processed the return under Section 143(1) of the Act. Subsequently, return of income was selected for scrutiny and notices under Section 143(2) and under Section 142(1) were also issued calling upon the assessee to furnish the necessary particulars. The authorized representative of the asse .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

hich is a sister concern of the assessee, carrying on construction of various commercial and residential projects. The authorized representative of the assessee contended that the borrowed amount advanced to its sister concern was in the nature of sale consideration that was being paid to the sister concern for the purpose of acquiring a portion of the property in the project proposed to be developed in the name and style "Embassy Meadows". As per the agreement, the assessee was allott .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

that though the assessee availed loan from KSIIDC, the same was diverted to its sister concern, the amount received was not utilized for the business of the assessee and no income has been accrued to the assessee. The sister concern of the assessee has also not utilized the said amount for the purpose of the project. Hence, the assessee is not entitled for deduction of interest. Further, the Assessing Officer also denied some of the other deductions under Section 43D towards the expenditure inc .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

hree assessment orders on various grounds. The First Appellate Authority, after considering the matter in detail and taking into consideration the judgments of various High Courts, while partly allowing the appeals, denied the expenditure on interest for the three assessment years by its order dated 18-03-2008. The assessee being aggrieved by the order passed by the First Appellate Authority preferred three appeals before the Tribunal. The Tribunal after considering the matter in detail held tha .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

not yet started the Project. Hence, the assessee is not entitled for any deduction towards interest paid on the loan availed and dismissed the appeals. However, some relief was given insofar as other expenditure is concerned. The assessee being aggrieved by the order passed by the Tribunal, has preferred these appeals. 3. These appeals were admitted on 11-11-2009 to consider the following substantial questions of law: (i) Whether the Tribunal was justified in law in disallowing interest on borro .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

cision of Apex Court in CIT Vs Rajendra Prasad Moody reported in 115 ITR 519 andCIT Vs Indian Bank Limited reported in 56 ITR 77 on the facts and circumstances of the case? 4. Sri.A.Shankar, learned counsel appearing for the assessee contended that the order passed by the Tribunal confirming the orders passed by the First Appellate Authority and Assessing Authority insofar as disallowing the expenditure with regard to interest for the assessment years referred to above is contrary to law. The as .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

the assessee, the assessee was allotted a portion of the property to be developed by the sister concern admeasuring 30000 sq. ft. and 25 covered car park area. The amount being advanced to its sister concern was in the nature of sale consideration that was being paid to the sister concern for the purpose of acquisition of a portion of the property in the proposed project of its sister concern in the name and style, "Embassy Meadows". The advance was not in the nature of assets. The loa .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

in turn the DDPL provisionally allotted an area to an extent of 30000 sq.ft. and 25 covered car parking area in the project of "Embassy Meadows" for a consideration of ₹ 3.25 crores. In the above said judgment, the Hon'ble Supreme Court, while examining Section 36(1)(iii) and Section 37 of the Act, held that interest on money borrowed from the Bank and lent to the sister concern without charging interest for the purpose of its business is an allowable deduction under Section .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

OF INCOME-TAX (APPEALS) AND ANOTHER; (2) (1969) 74 ITR 723 (COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, BOMBAY CITY II v/s BOMBAY SAMACHAR LTD., BOMBAY); (3) (1979) 118 ITR 200 (MADHAV PRASAD JATIA v/s COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, U.P.); (4) (2008) 298 ITR 194 (SC) (DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX v/s CORE HEALTH CARE LTD.); and (5) (1965) 56 ITR 77 (SC) (COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, MADRAS v/s INDIAN BANK LIMITED.) 5. On the other hand, Sri. K. V. Aravind, learned counsel appearing for the Revenue argued in su .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

nterest paid to the said amount. In the instant case, though the assessee availed loan from KSIIDC, the said amount has not been utilized by the assessee, however it was diverted to its sister concern, for which one of the partners of the assessee, is also one of the Directors. Huge amount has been advanced for the alleged purchase of the properties, for which the approval and building plan has not been obtained from the competent authorities. Further, no formal agreement was also entered into b .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

deration all these aspects of the matter, disallowed the deduction of interest. The judgments relied upon by the assessee are not applicable to the facts of the present case and sought for dismissal of the appeals. 6. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the parties and perused the orders passed by the Tribunal, First Appellate Authority and the Assessing Authority. 7. The records clearly disclose that the assessee-Firm is engaged in the business of real estate and construction of commercial .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

e profit and loss account and filed the returns. The said returns were taken up for scrutiny and notice under Section 143(2) was issued for appearance before the Assessing Authority. Also notice under Section 142(1) was issued calling for necessary particulars. In pursuance of the same, an authorized representative of the assessee appeared and produced necessary documents. The Assessing Authority, after examining the matter, disallowed the expenditure towards interest and other expenditures on t .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

d car parking area which was valued at ₹ 3.50 crores, the assessee claimed deduction of interest on the loan availed. However, the Assessing Officer disallowed the said deduction on the ground that the assessee has not utilized the loan availed whereas it was diverted to its sister concern for which, one of the partners of the assessee is also one of the Directors. The records produced by the assessee clearly disclose that the DDPL has also not utilized said loan amount for the purpose of .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

loan in five quarterly installments of ₹ 50,00,000/- each with an initial moratorium of six months from the date of disbursement of the loan. As per the terms and conditions, the assessee has to repay the loan by June 2001. It is impossible to believe availing loan with interest at the rate of 18.5% p.a. to book a flat, in a project for which the plan has not yet been sanctioned by the competent authorities and construction has not yet been started. The authorities below, after taking into .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

lly agreed to allot an extent of 30000 sq.ft. and 25 covered car park area in the project "Embassy Meadows", no concrete material has been produced before the authorities concerned. Initially, the assessee itself wanted to put up "Embassy Meadows", however, the responsibility of construction has been given to its sister concern DDPL. The land belongs to another sister concern. Even after three years, the Project has not yet been commenced. Whether ₹ 65,00,000/- paid for .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

acts of each case. The decision of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in S.A.Builders case can be applied, only if commercial expediency is established with facts. Unless interest free loan goes to business interest of the assessee, there cannot be any commercial expediency. For example, if the Company or a Firm supplying raw materials for construction of the building help the assessee to carry on the business more successfully, certainly commercial expediency can be canvassed. However, in the instan .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

t the assessee has failed to establish commercial expediency. The finding recorded by the authorities is purely a question of fact. The decision of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in S.A.Builders case could be applied only, if on facts, the assessee establishes commercial expediency in advancing interest free loan to its sister concern. 9. The judgments relied upon by the assessee is not applicable to the facts of the present case. The Hon'ble Supreme Court in a judgment reported in (2007) 288 .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 



|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version