Subscription   Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Articles Highlights TMI Notes SMS News Newsletters Calendar Imp. Links Database Experts Contact us More....
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

S. Mukanchand Bothra Versus P. Mani

Offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act - Dishonor of cheque due to insufficient funds - Held that:- Once the issuance of the cheque has been admitted, the appellant/complainant is entitled to invoke presumption under Section 118 and 139 of the Negotiable Instruments Act that the cheque has been issued for discharging the legally subsisting liability. The said presumption is a rebuttable one and so, the burden is upon the respondent/accused to prove that the cheque was not is .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

as not rebutted the presumption invoked under Section 139 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. Further, he has not probabilised his defence. Hence, the onus does not shift to the complainant.

Hence, I am of the view that the cheque has been issued for discharging the legally enforceable debt. When the cheque was presented for encashment, it was returned as 'insufficient funds' on 11.09.2002. Hence, statutory notice has been issued to the respondent on 14.09.2002. However, the same was r .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ted:- 6-3-2015 - MS. R.MALA, J. For The Appellant : Mr.S.Mukanchand Bothra (party-in-person) For The Respondent : Mr.K.Ramani JUDGMENT The Criminal Appeals arise out of the judgment of acquittal dated 07.10.2011 in C.C.Nos.6788 and 6787 of 2002 on the file of the learned VIII Metropolitan Magistrate, George Town, Chennai. 2. The facts of the case are as follows: Crl. A.No.801 of 2011 (C.C.No.6788 of 2002): (i) The appellant herein as a complainant preferred a private complaint stating that the r .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

station not claimed as per Ex.P4/return cover. Therefore, the appellant preferred a private complaint against the respondent/accused under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. Crl. A.No.802 of 2011 (C.C.No.6787 of 2002): (ii) The appellant herein as a complainant preferred a private complaint stating that the respondent/accused had borrowed loan from the complainant and to discharge the said liability, he had given Ex.P1 cheque dated 04.09.2002 for ₹ 50,000/-. When the appellant .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

Act. 3. The trial Court has taken cognizance of an offence, after following the procedure and recording sworn statement. Since the accused pleaded not guilty, the trial Court examined P.W.1 and marked Exs.P1 to P4 on the side of the complainant. No oral and documentary evidence were let in on the side of the respondent. The trial Court after considering the oral and documentary evidence, acquitted the accused for the offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act by holding that th .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

n is rebuttable one. But the respondent/accused has not rebutted the presumption by preponderance of probabilities. Whereas the trial Court has wrongly held that burden is shifted upon the complainant to prove that the cheque is issued for discharging legally subsisting liability. It is further submitted that the trial Court has held that the complainant has not obtained licence for money lending business, which is against law and the income tax returns shows that the debt of the accused was not .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

thra); (iii) S. A.Nos.280 to 285 of 1998, dated 30.06.2011 (Kuppayammal v. A.Sitheswaran); 5. Resisting the same, the learned counsel for the respondent would submit that the appellant has not proved that the cheque has been issued for discharging the legally subsisting liability. The said cheques were given only as security at the time of borrowal of money, which was subsequently repaid. Further, any amount of money exceeding ₹ 20,000/- has to be paid only by way of cheque. However, it wa .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ii) CDJ 2008 MHC 4594 (Mad.) (Kalavally v. Parthasarathy); (iii) 2014 (8) Scale 669 (Ramdas v. Krishnanand); (iv) (2008) 4 Supreme Court Cases 54, Krishna Janardhan Bhat v. Dattatraya G.Hegde. 6. Considered the rival submissions made by both sides and perused the typed set of papers. 7. Once the issuance of the cheque has been admitted, the appellant/complainant is entitled to invoke presumption under Section 118 and 139 of the Negotiable Instruments Act that the cheque has been issued for disch .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

Cr.) DCC 5 (SC) (Rangappa v. Sri Mohan), the accused must prove his defence not only by examination of fresh witness, however he may place reliance on the prosecution evidence. Before adverting to the facts of the case, it would be appropriate to consider the decision relied on by both sides. 9. The Party-in-Person relied on the following decisions: 9.1. In the decision of the Hon'ble Apex Court made in Criminal Appeal No.1020 of 2010, Rangappa v. Sri Mohan, it was held that the bare denial .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

act upon the plea that it did not exist. 9.2. In the decision of this Court dated 29.04.2011 made in Crl.R. C.No.807 of 2005 and 556 of 2006, S.Swarna v. S.Mukanchand Bothra, it was held that once they plead discharge, the person who pleads discharge must prove the same. The respondent herein has proved that he discharged the same. But, he has not filed any documents to prove the discharge. It is appropriate to incorporate paragraph 12 of the said decision: 12. At this juncture, it is appropria .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

that the respondents/defendants have failed to discharge the initial burden that they only put their signatures in blank promissory notes and having regard to sections 2(12) and 2(14) of the Indian Stamp Act and Section 20 of the N. I. Act, it has to be presumed that the document was executed by the defendants and therefore, under Section 118 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, presumption shall be drawn in favour of the plaintiff that the document was executed for consideration and the defendant .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ppellant for the purpose of income tax with regard to the cheque loan. In this regard, PW1, the complainant would depose that in the statement of account ending with 31.03.2000, he has given the particulars with regard to the loan to his Auditor. Again he reiterated the same evidence in his cross examination. But he has not produced the income tax return to the Court. It is observed by the learned Judicial Magistrate in the judgment that the complainant has produced a copy of the income tax acco .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

nce of production of income tax returns, it is to be held that the loan transaction should not have been shown in the account. As per the settled position of law, when the income tax assessee fails to produce income tax returns containing the loan transaction, it should have been observed that the alleged loan transaction is a an illegal one. Further, he has not disputed the genuineness of Exs. D1 to D3 and the evidence of PW2 with regard to these documents. 10.2. In the decision reported in (20 .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ct, any advance taken by way of loan of more than ₹ 20,000 had to be made by an account payee cheque. 10.3. The decision reported in 2014 (8) SCALE 669, Ramdas S/o Khelunaik v. Krishnanand S/o Vishnu Naik does not apply to the facts of the present case because it was held therein that the case has been filed as if it was for borrowal of money. In paragraph 9 of the said decision, it was stated as follows: 9. ... We find from the record that admittedly, the accused appellant deals with sale .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

pellant. There was also no calculation of account or stipulation of any interest on the alleged loan amount to show as to how the amount of ₹ 5,00,000/- was figured, in return of a hand loan of ₹ 1,75,000/- if at all taken by the appellant from the complainant. It is also not on record whether there was sufficient balance amount or not in the bank account of the accused when the cheque was dishonoured by the Bank. The Complainant himself stated in the crossexamination that after the .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ble evidence has been let in. Hence, the above citation is not applicable. 10.4. In the decision reported in CDJ 2008 MHC 4594, Kalavally v. Parthasarathy, it was held that once presumption under Section 139 has been rebutted, the onus is shifted to the complainant to prove that the cheque has been issued for discharge. It is appropriate to incorporate paragraph 44 of the said decision: 44. In this case, the evidence on record makes it abundantly clear that the accused has proved the defence tak .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ccount books to show that he was carrying on quarrying business as claimed by him and no documentary proof has been produced to prove his means it should be held that the complainant has failed to prove that the cheque was given in discharge of a legally recoverable liability. When the defence taken by the accused is that the complainant was a man of no means, it is the bounden duty of the complainant to prove by acceptable evidence that he had the means on the date on which he is alleged to hav .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

why such document was not obtained from the accused. 11. Considering the citations submitted by both sides, now this Court has to consider the facts of the present case. It is admitted that the respondent has borrowed ₹ 35 lakhs and that amount was also shown in the Income Tax returns. Further, when a suggestion was posted to the appellant that at the time of borrowal of money, blank cheques were issued which was subsequently filled up and complaint has been filed was denied by him. 12. I .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

Act that the cheque has been issued for discharging the legally subsisting liability. Now, it is the duty of the respondent/accused to rebut the presumption that he had borrowed the money and repaid the same and that the cheque has been issued only as a security. However, except the denial made by P.W.1, no other evidence is available. The respondent herein has not filed any document to show that the amount has been repaid. As per the decision of the Hon'ble Apex Court, it is the duty of th .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ppear to be any defence. Something which is probable has to be brought on record for getting the benefit of shifting the onus of proving to the plaintiff. However, in the instant case, to prove that he had repaid the money, the respondent has not let in any evidence. Hence, I am of the view that the respondent herein has not rebutted the presumption invoked under Section 139 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. Further, he has not probabilised his defence. Hence, the onus does not shift to the com .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

judgment has stated that the amount lent to the respondent/accused has not been shown in the liability column in the Income Tax return. The party-in-person would submit that the said amount was shown in the assets column and not in the liability column. However, the Trial Court has not considered the same. It is also true that the Income Tax return has not been marked. However, as per the application filed under Section 91 Cr.P. C, the said document was produced before the Trial Court. When the .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

nvoke presumption under Section 118 and 139 of the Negotiable Instruments Act that the cheque has been issued for discharging the legally subsisting liability, which is a rebuttable presumption. However, the presumption has not been rebutted by this respondent/accused. He has not probabilised his defence by preponderance of probabilities. Hence, I am of the view that the cheque has been issued for discharging the legally enforceable debt. When the cheque was presented for encashment, it was retu .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

what is new what is new
  ↓     Latest Happenings     ↓  

Notification: Exempt certain supplies to NPCIL.

Notification: Seeks to amend notification No. 12/2017-CT(R) to exempt right to admission to the events organised under FIFA U-17 World Cup 2017

Notification: Seeks to amend notification No. 11/2017-CT(R) to reduce CGST rate on specified supplies of Works Contract Services.

Forum: 3B mistake

Forum: Excise duty credit on finished stock at additional place of business.

Forum: Input tax credit

Forum: Cess paid instead of SGST

Forum: Manpower Service provider

Forum: Construction of single unit bungalow

Forum: Duty Drawback & Input Credit - under GST

Article: SIMPLIFIED E-WAY BILL UNDER GST

Article: SERVICES UNDER REVERSE CHARGE UNDER GST REGIME

Highlight: Rate of exchange of conversion of the foreign currency with effect from 22th September, 2017 - Notification

Highlight: Companies (Acceptance of Deposits) Second Amendment Rules, 2017 - Notification

Highlight: Implementing Electronic Sealing for containers by exporters under self-sealing procedure prescribed by Circular 26/2017-Cus dated 1st July, 2017 and Circular 36/2017 dated 28 th August, 2017. — reg. - Circular

Highlight: Amendment to Paragraph 2.72 (b) of the Handbook of Procedures of the Foreign Trade Policy (FTP) 2015-20 - Public Notice

Notification: Amendment in Appendix 3 (SCOMET items) to Schedule- 2 of ITC (HS) Classification of Export and Import Items 2012

Circular: Amendment to Paragraph 2.72 (b) of the Handbook of Procedures of the Foreign Trade Policy (FTP) 2015-20

Notification: Companies (Acceptance of Deposits) Second Amendment Rules, 2017

Notification: Rate of exchange of conversion of the foreign currency with effect from 22th September, 2017

News: Exchange Rate of Foreign Currency Relating To Imported and Export Goods Notified

Circular: Promote the officers of the Indian Revenue Service (Customs and Central Excise) to the grade of Principal commissioner of customs, GST & CX

Circular: Allocate the charges amongst the Members of the Central Board of Excise and Customs

Circular: Strategy for audits in 2017-18 consequent to GST - Audit by Central Excise and service Department to continue for the accounting year 2016-17 and for the past period

Circular: Appoint the IRS (C&CE) officers as Principal Commissioner (Revision Application) and ex-officio Additional Secretary

Circular: Time limit for filing intimation for composition levy under Rule 3(1) of the CGST Rules, 2017 extended to 16-8-2017

Circular: Extension of time limit for submitting the declaration in FORM GST TRAN-1 under rule 120A of the Central Goods and Service Tax Rules, 2017

Circular: C.B.E. & C. Advisory on Customs related matters on introduction of Goods and Services Tax regime

Circular: List of Reduced Tax Liabilities under GST regime in comparison to present combined Indirect Tax rates

Circular: Works Contract for construction of Flats, Complex — Builders to pass on GST benefit to buyer otherwise anti-profiteering provisions of Section 171 of GST Act to apply

Circular: Clarification regarding applicability of section 16 of the IGST Act, 2017, relating to zero rated supply for the purpose of Compensation Cess on exports – Regarding.

Circular: Clarification on Inter-state movement of various modes of conveyance, carrying goods or passengers or for repairs and maintenance- regarding

News: RBI Reference Rate for US $

Highlight: Addition u/s 23(1)(a) - deemed rent - once the property is let out and at any point of time this remained vacant during the same cannot be brought to tax under the head House properties income.

News: Haryana constitutes screening committee on anti-profiteering

Highlight: Valuation of imported goods - it is necessary to re-examine the matter of both license agreement as well as supply contract simultaneously, to see if the enhanced royalty was in the guise of adjustment of the price of components.

Notification: Levy of anti dumping duty on New/unused pneumatic radial tyres with or without tubes and/or flap of rubber (including tubeless tyres) having normal rim dia code above 16 originating in, or exported from China PR

Highlight: Cenvat credit availed on Club Membership for the Director is not admissible as it cannot be said to be remotely connected with the activity of manufacture

Circular: Amendments in Hand Book of Procedures 2015-20 –reg.

News: Jaitley asks biz not to wait till last day to file GST returns

Circular: Implementing Electronic Sealing for containers by exporters under self-sealing procedure prescribed by Circular 26/2017-Cus dated 1st July, 2017 and Circular 36/2017 dated 28 th August, 2017. — reg.

Article: 20 Things You must know about E Way Bills in GST Law

Article: ‘DUTY DRAWBACK’ CANNOT BE EQUATED WITH ‘REBATE OF DUTY’

Highlight: Notification regarding GST rate for branded cereal, pulses and flour

News: Notification regarding GST rate for branded cereal, pulses and flour

Highlight: Anti-dumping duty on import of bus/truck tyres from China

Highlight: Cabinet approves Extension of time period of the Scheme "Special Industry Initiative for J&K" (Sll J&K) - Udaan

Highlight: Non-payment of service tax - maintenance and repair charges - appellants had knowingly and deliberately shown the repair charges as job work charges to mislead about their taxability - demand confirmed.

Highlight: BAS - execution of the project of smart card for vehicle registration – implementing the SOC-VRC project - The fact that the Government has outsourced some part of the work and paid certain consideration for such outsourced work, does not make the activity subject to service tax.

News: Cabinet approves Extension of time period of the Scheme "Special Industry Initiative for J&K" (Sll J&K) - Udaan



|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version