Subscription   Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Articles Highlights TMI Notes SMS News Newsletters Calendar Imp. Links Database Experts Contact us More....
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

Commissioner of Income Tax (Central) , Gurgaon Versus M/s Parabolic Drugs Limited

Penalty under Section 271(1)(c) - disallowance under Section 80IB was made by the Assessing Officer not because of any difference of opinion but because such deduction was not available to the assessee by virtue of specific provision of law - ITAT deleted the penalty - Held that:- The CIT(A) as well as the Tribunal had concurrently concluded that the assessee in the computation of income while claiming deduction under Section 80IB of the Act had disclosed complete facts. The assessee had claimed .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

₹ 2.93 crores and because of the addition made in the assessment year under appeal of ₹ 58.33 lacs, the total investment came to ₹ 3.51 crores. In such circumstances, it could not be said that the assessee had not made a bonafide claim of deduction under Section 80IB of the Act. Therefore, the penalty was rightly deleted by CIT(A) and upheld by the Tribunal. We do not find any error in the approach adopted by the CIT(A) as well as the Tribunal - Decided in favour of assessee. - .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

. Whether, in the facts and circumstances of the case, the Hon'ble ITAT was legally justified in deleting the penalty of ₹ 10,84,050/- imposed under Section 271(1)(c) of the Act without appreciating that the disallowance under Section 80IB was made by the Assessing Officer not because of any difference of opinion but because such deduction was not available to the assessee by virtue of specific provision of law and therefore the claim of deduction made by the assessee amounted to furni .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

the appeal may be noticed The assessee was in the business of manufacturing of bulk drugs and fine chemicals. During the year under consideration, the assessee had claimed deduction under section 80IB of the Act of ₹ 29,62,491/-. It was found that the assessee had claimed its unit as small scale industry. However, investment in plant and machinery was ₹ 351.59 lacs. The assessee was asked to explain how its unit was small scale industry. Not satisfied with the reply, the Assessing O .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

der section 271(1)(c) of the Act had also been initiated. During the course of penalty proceedings, the Assessing Officer after considering the facts of the case as well as legal position concluded that the assessee had concealed the particulars of income to the tune of ₹ 29,62,491/-. Therefore, the Assessing Officer imposed penalty under Section 271(1)(c) of the Act at the rate of 100% of the tax sought to be evaded which came to ₹ 10,84,050/-. Aggrieved by the order, the assessee f .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

hing of inaccurate particulars. Not satisfied with the order, the revenue filed appeal before the Tribunal. Vide order dated 18.11.2014, Annexure A.3, the appeal was dismissed. Hence the instant appeal. 3. We have heard learned counsel for the appellant-revenue. 4. Learned counsel for the revenue submitted that vide Order F.No.10/6/97/1P dated 10.12.1997, the Ministry of Industry fixed the investment limit in fixed assets in plant and machinery at ₹ 3 crores in respect of a unit to be elig .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ircumstances, levy of penalty under section 271(1)(c) of the Act on account of concealment of income had been rightly imposed by the Assessing Officer. However, CIT(A) as well as the Tribunal had erroneously recorded a finding that the assessee had bonafide claimed the said deduction and deleted the penalty. 5. After hearing learned counsel for the revenue, we do not find any merit in the appeal. 6. The CIT(A) while accepting the appeal of the assessee had noticed as under:- 4.3 I have considere .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ction 271(1)(c), penalty is to be levied if the assessee has concealed particulars of income or has furnished inaccurate particulars of such income. Assessee has contended that the penalty was not sustainable as the charge contemplated under section 271(1)(c) is not clear. Be that as it is, it is a fact that deduction has been claimed under Section 80IB(3) in the status of a small scale industry. This was found to be incorrect as per the notification of the Ministry of Industry for small scale u .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

of its plant and machinery as well as the calculation of deduction under Section 80IB was furnished in the return of income, so it could not be said that particulars of income were concealed or filed inaccurately. Here a claim has been made which was found to be incorrect. This claim was on the basis of certificate issued by the auditor in the requisite form 1OCCB. The violation is the investment in plant and machinery exceeded the limit prescribed by the Ministry of industries. Notification as .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

rticulars of its income. The penalty levied is therefore directed to be deleted. 7. The said findings were affirmed by the Tribunal vide order dated 18.11.2014, Annexure A.3 as under- 9. We have considered rival submissions and material available on record and do not find any justification to interfere with the order of the learned CIT(Appeals) in cancelling the penalty under Section 271(1(c) of the Act. The assessee while making claim of deduction under Section 80IB of the Act in computation of .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

4.2004 was ₹ 2.93 crores and because of the addition made in the assessment year under appeal of ₹ 58.33 lacs, the total investment comes to ₹ 3.51 crores. It is therefore clear that the assessee was small scale industrial unit and was entitled for deduction under section 80IB earlier and it is only because of some additions made in year under consideration, the assessee would not have qualified for deduction under Section 80IB of the Act. The assessee therefore made a bonafide .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

what is new what is new
  ↓     Latest Happenings     ↓  

News: Notification Issued For GST Actionable Claim On Branded Food Products

News: GST Refund - Blockage of Working Capital of Exporters - earlier also there was a normal blockage of funds for a period of 5-6 months at least

News: Clarification about Transition Credit - ₹ 1.27 lakh crore of credit of Central Excise and Service Tax was lying as closing balance as on 30th June, 2017 - claim of credit of ₹ 65,000 crore is not unexpected

Article: 20 Things You must know about E Way Bills in GST Law

Article: MISTAKES IN DRAFTING

Forum: Duty Drawback- Urgent

Highlight: The Customs and Central Excise Duties Drawback Rules, 2017 and All Industry Rates (AIRs) of Drawback related changes -reg. - Circular

Highlight: The definition of "subsidiary company" or "subsidiary" u/s 2(87) of the Companies Act, 2013 shall come into force w.e.f. 20-9-2017

Highlight: Central Government notified the All Industry Rates of Duty Drawback Schedule w.e.f. 1.10.2017 - Notification

Notification: All Industry Rates of Duty Drawback Schedule w.e.f. 1.10.2017

Circular: Investment by Foreign Portfolio Investors in Corporate Debt Securities Review

Notification: Exemptions on supply of services under UTGST Act

Notification: Rates for supply of services under UTGST Act

Notification: Exemptions on supply of services under IGST Act

Notification: Rates for supply of services under IGST Act

Notification: List of Exempted supply of services under the CGST Act

Notification: Rates for supply of services under CGST Act

Highlight: Acceptance of deposits by companies from its members - conditions relaxed in case of Specified IFSC Public company and a private company - Rule 3 amended

Notification: Rate of exchange of conversion of the foreign currency with effect from 8th September, 2017

News: Tax Payers Advised To Confirm Identities Of Income Tax Search Authorities

Notification: Amendment in Appendix 3 (SCOMET items) to Schedule- 2 of ITC (HS) Classification of Export and Import Items 2012

Forum: GST Invoice

Notification: The Customs and Central Excise Duties Drawback Rules, 2017

Circular: The Customs and Central Excise Duties Drawback Rules, 2017 and All Industry Rates (AIRs) of Drawback related changes -reg.

News: GST implementation smoother than expected: Jaitley

Forum: GST - TRAN1 - filed - Data uploaded with Remarks Processed with Error - Not coming in Electronic credit ledger - need suggession guidance

Forum: 3B mistake

Forum: Input tax credit

Forum: Excise duty credit on finished stock at additional place of business.

Forum: Due date of Filing TRAN-1

Highlight: Diversion of income at source - Joint venture agreement - 97% of the receipt transfer to M/s TRG Industries (P) Ltd. - scope of the agreement - it is diversion by overriding title - not taxable in the hands of assessee - HC

Highlight: Expenditure on eligible projects or schemes u/s 35AC - After 01.04.2017 the legislature desired to withdraw such deduction. - The Union legislature was competent to introduce such amendment - HC

Highlight: Transfer of trading assets at cost price, the profit component also stood transferred to the outgoing Directors, which otherwise belonged to the Company - the fact that AO has made the addition in the hands of the Directors would not make any difference - additions confirmed - HC

Highlight: The interest u/s 234B of the Act cannot go beyond the stage of S.245D(I) before the Settlement Commission - HC

Highlight: Galvanized iron pipe is a different commercial commodity than a iron pipe, therefore the activity of galvanization in our considered opinion amounts to manufacture - Deduction u/s 80-IB allowed - HC

Highlight: Penalty u/s 271C - non deduction of TDS on interest paid to sister concerns in terms of Section 194A - Levy of penalty confirmed - HC

Highlight: Disallowance of interest - reference to section 179 - The legislature has also recognised, that the doctrine of lifting of veil in the matter of tax dues is to be applied to prevent fraud etc. and not where the company has suffered despite its normal bona fide function. - HC

News: RBI Reference Rate for US $

Notification: Amendment in Notification No. S.O. 3118(E), dated the 3rd October, 2016

Highlight: Discount on ESOP to be allowed as business expenditure u/s 37(1), during the years of vesting on the basis of percentage of vesting during such period, subject to upward or downward adjustment at the time of exercise of option.

Notification: Central Government appoints the 20th September, 2017 as the date on which proviso to clause (87) of section 2 of the Companies Act 2013, shall come into force

Notification: Companies (Restriction on number of layers) Rules, 2017

Highlight: Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - additional income disclosure - surrender of income post survey u/s 133A - he disclosure made by the assessee is voluntary in nature, in the revised return - no penalty

Highlight: Reopening of assessment - notice u/s 148 issued on the directions of JCIT / CIT - a perusal of reasons for initiating reassessment proceedings clearly show that they are against the sprit of provisions u/s 147

Highlight: MAT - Adjustment to book profit - computation u/clause (f) of Explanation-1 to section 115JB(2) is to be made without resorting to the computation as contemplated u/s 14A r.w.Rule 8D of I.T. Rules.

Highlight: Addition on account of alleged suppression of service value received - the addition made simply believing the Form 26AS will be an arbitrary exercise of power which cannot be sustained

Notification: Exempts intra state supply of heavy water and nuclear fuels from DAE to NPCIL

Notification: Seeks to amend notification No. 12/2017-UTT(R) to exempt right to admission to the events organised under FIFA U-17 World Cup 2017

Notification: Seeks to amend notification No. 11/2017- UTT(R) to reduce CGST rate on specified supplies of Works Contract Services

Highlight: Liability to pay duty on import of software - Though no authorization was given by the appellant to DHL, it is an undisputed position that the software has, in fact, been ordered by the appellant and have been delivered to them by DHL - the appellant is to be considered as the importer



|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version