Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India. Com TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Acts / Rules Notifications Circulars Tariff/ ITC HSN Forms Case Laws Manuals Short Notes Articles SMS News Highlights
        Home        
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

M/s Nagar Taluka Sahakari Kharedi Vikri Sangh Ltd. Versus Commissioner of Central Excise, Customs & Service Tax, Ahmednagar

2015 (9) TMI 1385 - CESTAT MUMBAI

Renting of Immovable Property Service - Penalty u/s 76, 77 & 78 - Held that:- If the tax is due as on 6 th of March, 2012 and if the same has been paid alongwith interest within period of six months from the date on which the Finance Bill, 2012 received the assent of the President, no penalties shall be imposable for failure to pay the service tax. - Demand is for the period 2007-2011 and the same was payable on 6 th day of march 2012. The liability of service tax in full alongwith interest has .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

before the adjudicating authority or before the Commissioner (Appeals) and no documentary evidence was submitted before the said lower authorities. Therefore same cannot be verified at this stage therefore demand is upheld - Penalties are set aside - Decided in favour of assessee. - Appeal No. ST/85371/13 - Final Order No. A/2087/2015-WZB/SMB - Dated:- 17-6-2015 - Ramesh Nair, Member (J),J. For the Appellant : None For the Respondent : Shri Das, Dy Commissioner (AR) ORDER Per: Ramesh Nair: This .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

tax was worked out to ₹ 4,87,835/-. The activity of renting was covered by the definition of Renting of Immovable Property Service as defined under clause (zzzz) of Section 65(105) of Finance Act, 1994. The appellant failed to obtain service tax registration and to pay applicable service tax. The show cause to this effect was issued proposing demand and the recovery of the service tax amounting to ₹ 4,87,835/- alongwith applicable interest in terms of Section 75 of the Act. It was al .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

peared on behalf of the appellant, nor any adjournment request was made, therefore I proceed to decide the matter on merit. 4. Shri Das, Dy Commissioner (A.R) appearing on behalf of the Revenue reiterates the findings of the impugned order. 5. We have carefully considered the submissions made by Ld. A.R. and gone through the grounds of appeal. 6. I find that the appellant in their appeal has prayed for waiver of penalties under Section 76, 77 and 78 and also dropping of demand of ₹ 12,930/ .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

Section 80(2) of Finance Act, which reproduced below:- The new Section 80(2) reads as: Notwithstanding anything contained in the provisions of section 76 or section 77 or section 78, no penalty shall be imposable for failure to pay service tax payable, as on the 6 th day of March, 2012, on the taxable service referred to in sub-clause (zzzz) of clause (105) of section 65, subject to the condition that the amount of service tax along with interest is paid in full within a period of six months fr .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

Discussion Forum
what is new what is new
 


Share:            

|| Home || About us || Feedback || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version