GST Helpdesk   Subscription   Demo   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
What's New Case Laws Highlights Articles News Forum Short Notes Statutory TMI SMS More ...
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

2015 (10) TMI 472 - ITAT AHMEDABAD

2015 (10) TMI 472 - ITAT AHMEDABAD - TMI - Addition under the head “ labour charges shown payable” - CIT(A) deleted the addition - assessee’s audit report had shown this sum as provision on current liabilities - Held that:- Its P & L forming part of the case file reveals diamond cutting labour charges expenses of ₹ 28,01,793/- up to 31/03/2007 i.e. much more than ₹ 2 lacs stated in assessment order. There is no other material quoted either in assessment or during arguments before us .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

or the purpose of granting depreciation on the ground that the same had not been put to use; is not justifiable. This lordships quote earlier decision reported as CIT vs. Sonal Hem Industries (2009 (2) TMI 84 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT). The Revenue does not point out distinction on facts and law. Its corresponding ground is accordingly rejected.- Decided against revenue.

Low household withdrawal addition - Held that:- It has come on record that assessee is a bachelor, and his father has al .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

sessment Year 2007-08 V/232/09-10, in proceedings under section 143(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961; in short the Act . 2. The Revenue s first substantive ground challenges lower appellate order deleting addition of ₹ 17,30,383/- under the head labour charges shown payable . The assessee s audit report had shown this sum as provision on current liabilities. The Assessing Officer was of the view that it had debited wages sums of ₹ 8,73,734/- for February and ₹ 10,56,649/- in Marc .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

#8377; 8,73,734/- + ₹ 10,56,649/- = ₹ 19,30,383/- and added balance amount of ₹ 17,30,387/- in assessee s hands. 3. The CIT(A) has reversed Assessing Officer s action as follows:- 4.2. During the course of appellate proceedings, the AR of the appellant submitted that the main reason for the delay in payment of labour charges was the non-receipt of the job-work receipt for the month of February and March 2007 since, during this period on account of global recession the diamond i .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

entire labour payment is supported by proper and duly signed labour register and no defects therein has been pointed out by the AO nor has the AO doubted the genuineness of the labour expenses. Moreover, in making the impugned addition the AO has not even rejected the books results. Furthermore, the AR argued that the AO has erroneously computed the amount of labour payment per labourer per month at ₹ 918/- by considering only the payment of ₹ 2,00,000/- made for the month of March .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ion on a wrong footing and in fact the average labour payment per labourer per month works out to ₹ 3,159/- as shown in the above table, which under no circumstances can be considered as low. Moreover, it was also submitted that the AO has not brought any evidence on record to allege that the appellant had earned any income outside the books of accounts, so as to make the labour payments outside the books and there is also no evidence that the appellant had made any payment outside his boo .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ein. (b) The AO has not brought any material on record to show that the appellant has earned any income outside the books of accounts or that the appellant has made any payment outside the books of accounts in the year under consideration. (c) The labour payments have been made by the appellant in the subsequent month of the next financial year which the AO has failed to verify. d) Not a single defect has been found out by the AO in the books of account of the appellant which was produced before .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

pinion that the AO is at all not justified in presuming that the appellant might have made labour payment outside the books and therefore, I hereby delete the addition of ₹ 17,30,383/- as made by the AO for outstanding labour payments as at the year end. In the result, Ground of Appeal No. 1 of the appellant is allowed. 4. The Revenue strongly reiterates the Assessing Officer s inference drawn of labour payments of ₹ 918/- per household in first February month. The assessee strongly .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ation disallowance of ₹ 9,24,475/-. The very amount in assessment order reads ₹ 6,54,480/- and one of that claimed of ₹ 9,24,475/-. The assessment happens to be the promoter of M/s. Amrut Impex and also runs independent business. He had shown only diamond cutting laser machine in case of the above stated concern. The Assessing Officer was of the view that Diamond OGI and Sarin maker machine had not been put to use. He quoted assessee s clarification stated to have been using ma .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

that even in the activity of diamond cutting by laser machines on job-work basis, the diamond marker machines are used to first plan the shape, size and design and thereafter, cut it through the laser machines and hence, it cannot be alleged that the diamond marker machines are of no use in the diamond cutting activity carried out by laser machines. The AR further submitted that over and above the diamond laser cutting activity, he is also engaged in the business of importing of rough diamonds, .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

nd marker machines have been used in the month of March 2007 for planning the shape, size and design of the said imported rough diamonds also, over and above the use thereof in the activity of diamond cutting laser job-work and thus, the diamond marker machines have even been used in both the activities i.e. laser cutting job-work as also the activity of import of rough diamonds and manufacturing of polished diamonds. It was also submitted by the appellant that in the scrutiny assessment proceed .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

s' which comprises of various items and not on a particular asset and thus, once an asset becomes a part of the 'Block of Asset' and depreciation is granted on that Block of Assets, the same cannot be denied in the subsequent year, on the ground that one of the asset of the said Block of Asset, was not used by the assessee in the said subsequent year. In support of this argument, reliance was placed on the decision of ITAT, Mumbai, in the case of Unitex Products Ltd. Vs. ITO (2008) 2 .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

he rough diamonds are cut with the help of Diamond Laser Machines. Thus, I agree with the appellant that the Diamond Marker Machines are also used in the activity of cutting diamonds on job-work basis and the appellant has also imported rough diamonds for polishing and hence; the said machines have also been used in that activity. Further, the depreciation on Diamond Marker Machines has been allowed to the appellant vide order u/s. 143(3) of the Act for the earlier year i.e. A.Y. 2006-07 also an .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

Latest Notifications:

    Dated      Category

20-7-2017 Cus (NT)

20-7-2017 GST CESS Rate

19-7-2017 IT

19-7-2017 IT

18-7-2017 IT

18-7-2017 CE (NT)

18-7-2017 CE

18-7-2017 GST CESS Rate

15-7-2017 Kerala SGST

14-7-2017 Andhra Pradesh SGST

14-7-2017 Cus (NT)

14-7-2017 Cus

13-7-2017 Co. Law

13-7-2017 Co. Law

13-7-2017 ADD

13-7-2017 ADD

12-7-2017 Jammu & Kashmir SGST

12-7-2017 Gujarat SGST

12-7-2017 Gujarat SGST

12-7-2017 CGST Rate

More Notifications


Latest Circulars:

19-7-2017 Goods and Services Tax

19-7-2017 Income Tax

18-7-2017 Customs

17-7-2017 Customs

14-7-2017 Income Tax

13-7-2017 Central Excise

13-7-2017 Customs

13-7-2017 Central Excise

13-7-2017 Customs

7-7-2017 Income Tax

More Circulars



|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version