New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

2015 (10) TMI 516 - CESTAT DELHI

2015 (10) TMI 516 - CESTAT DELHI - 2015 (39) S.T.R. 1004 (Tri. - Del.) - Denial of refund claim - Notification No.41/2007-ST as amended by the Notification No. 17/2009-ST, dated 6.10.2007 and 7.7.2009 - Held that:- appellate Commissioner was satisfied that all conditions for claiming refund of service tax were fulfilled, except that on account of a clerical error, the assessee/claimant failed to affix stamp on some of the bills. Revenue in the present appeal does not dispute the findings of fact .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

e Tax Appeal No.51344 of 2014 - Final Order No. 51436/2015 - Dated:- 7-4-2015 - Mr. G. Raghuram, President, J. For the Petitioner : Ms. Suchitra Sharma, A.R. For the Respondent : None Per Justice G. Raghuram: This appeal is preferred by Revenue on the singular ground that the respondent/assessee s claim, for refund of service tax remitted to the extent of ₹ 19,62,030/-, is not in strict technical compliance with the requirements stipulated in Notification No.41/2007-ST as amended by the No .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

s claimed. 3. Revenue preferred an appeal which was rejected by the impugned order dated 25.10.2013, passed by the Commissioner (Appeals-I), Raipur. Revenue s appeal before the lower appellate authority was confined to three components of the refund granted by the primary authority, amounting to ₹ 19,62,030/- i.e. a refund on port service and storage & warehousing service, claimed on the basis of Bills furnished by M/s Ramgopal Shipping Services, Kakinada. The Revenue claimed in its ap .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

following detailed reasons in para 8 of the impugned order: 8. I find that department had filed the instant appeal for rejection of refund claim of ₹ 19,62,030/- on the ground that Bills issued by service provider i.e. M/s Ramgopal Shipping Services Kakinada do not contain service tax registration number and nature of taxable service rendered by them. The respondent in their defence has contended that M/s Ramgopal Shipping Services Kakinada are mentioning the Registration No. by affixing .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

7149ASD001 which has been mentioned by affixing stamp on the body of the Bills and nature of taxable service rendered by them to the respondent has also been clearly mentioned on the body of the said Bills. I find that it is a undisputed fact that service provider is registered with department and has also discharged their service tax liability on the service rendered to the respondent and nature of taxable service rendered by them for which the said refund claim was filed by the respondent have .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 



|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version