TMI Blog2015 (10) TMI 784X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... Sri B.N. Chattopadhyay, Consultant & Sri N.K. Chowdhury, Advocate For the Respondent : Sri K. Choudhari, Supdt. (A.R.) ORDER Per SHRI H.K. THAKUR This stay application has been filed by the appellant for staying the operation of Order-in-Original No. 76/Commissioner/ST/Kol/2012-13 dated-20/03/2013 under which a Service Tax demand of Rs. 76,33,475/- alongwith interest has been confirmed against ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... tor of the appellant that M/s. Mackintosh has paid service tax of Rs. 2,20,25,218/- with respect to contract No. 05/09. Learned Advocate pointed out that demand of service tax on dredging service, as per para 4.2.5 of the order-in-original dated 20/3/2013 is also for work order No. 2005/09. On a specific query from the bench as to what are the nature of activities covered by work order No. 2005/09 ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ive of the confirmed dues. It is thus ordered that appellant shall pay an amount of Rs. 5.00 Lakhs (Rupees Five Lakhs) within 8 weeks and report compliance to the CESTAT Registry by 30/11/2015. Subject to the payment of the above amount there will be stay on the recovery of the remaining amounts, interest and penalties till the disposal of this appeal. X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|