2011 (11) TMI 654

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ed by the revenue under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as "the Act") against order dated 18.10.2010 passed in ITA No.983/CHANDI/2010 for the assessment year 2007-08 by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Chandigarh Bench 'B', Chandigarh. The revenue has contended that the following substantial questions of law arise in the facts of the case:- "1. Whether .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ntroduced by the creditors (earned as commodity profits) actually belonged to the assessee firm and, therefore, the same cannot be treated as unexplained under Section 68?" The department is aggrieved that in appeal the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) has deleted the addition of Rs. 33,11,510/- and the said order has been upheld by the Tribunal. It is the case of the department that the respo .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ng income tax payees, who have filed their returns showing the mode of advance and their sources and such affairs have been accepted by their respective Assessing Officers. Learned counsel for the revenue has urged that the credit worthiness and genuineness of the transactions have been doubted and the assessee could not explain the source of the credits of his creditors to the satisfaction of th .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X