Contact us   Feedback   Annual Subscription   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

2015 (10) TMI 1056 - MADRAS HIGH COURT

2015 (10) TMI 1056 - MADRAS HIGH COURT - 2015 (40) S.T.R. 211 (Mad.) - CENVAT Credit - whether the assessee was entitled to avail credit of service tax on the basis of TR-6 challans prior to 16.06.2005 as TR-6 challan was included as a specified document vide Notification No. 28/2005-CE(NT) dated 07.06.2005 with effect from 16.06.2005 - Held that:- Issue involved in these appeals, is no more res integra in view of the decision rendered by the Tribunal in the case of Commissioner of Central Excis .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

.A.P. Srinivas, Standing Counsel, for the Dept. For the Respondent : M/s. Raju K. Lukose ORDER R. Sudhakar, J Aggrieved by the order passed by the Tribunal allowing the assessee's appeal, the Department has filed the present appeals raising the following substantial question of law : Whether the 2nd respondent was correct in holding that the 1st respondent was entitled to avail credit of service tax on the basis of TR-6 Challans prior to 16-06-2005 as TR-6 challans was included as a specifie .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

service tax credit of (1) ₹ 1,35,152/- and Education Cess ₹ 2,649/-, (2) ₹ 4,04,001/- and Education Cess ₹ 8,021/- respectively on Goods Transport Agency Services paid for discharging the duty prior to issue of Notification No. 28/2005-CE dated 07.06.2005, which is recoverable under Rule 14 of Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 read with Section 11A alongwith interest under Section 11AB of the Central Excise Act, 1944. It is alleged that although the receipient of the service has .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

le 9 of Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 by availing inadmissible Cenvat Credit on Goods Transport Agency on the documents other than those prescribed in Rule 9 of the Cenvant Credit Rules, 2004, a Show Cause Notice was issued. 3. The adjudicating authority, vide his order dated 30.11.2006, held that the assessee is not entitled to Cenvat Credit of ₹ 1,35,152/- and Education Cess to ₹ 2,649/- availed on the TR6 challans issued during the period 01.01.2005 to 15.06.2005 and the said amount i .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

either side and perused the materials made available on record. 5. The core issue involved in these appeals is whether the assessee was entitled to avail credit of service tax on the basis of TR-6 challans prior to 16.06.2005 as TR-6 challan was included as a specified document vide Notification No. 28/2005-CE(NT) dated 07.06.2005 with effect from 16.06.2005. 6. The aforesaid issue involved in these appeals, is no more res integra in view of the decision rendered by the Tribunal in the case of C .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

me has been availed on the basis of TR-6 Challan, which was not a prescribed document at the relevant time and was introduced in the list of specified documents only with effect from 16-6-2005 by Notification No:28/2005-C.E. ( N.T.) dated 7.6.2005. 3. The Commissioner (Appeals) vide his impugned order has held the said documents to be proper for the purpose of availing credit by observing as under :- TR-6 challan is the most primary document evidencing payment of duty / tax. No doubt the TR-6 ch .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

(Tribunal). The appellant's case is squarely covered by this judgment. I, therefore, hold that disallowance of Cenvat credit is not correct. Consequently, interest and penalty also do not sustain. Order-in-Original is liable to be set aside. 4. Revenue in the Memo of appeal has again reiterated the same stand. Shri Prakash Shah, learned Advocate appearing for the Respondents submit that during the relevant time there was no list of specified documents on the basis of which credit could be ta .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

payment of duties. Further, it is also not the Revenue's case that the service tax was not paid by the Respondents or they were otherwise not entitled to the credit of the same. 7. The above said decision of the Tribunal was affirmed by a Division Bench of the Bombay High Court in Commissioner of Central Excise v. Essel Propack Ltd., AIT-2015-73-HC, wherein it was held as under: 7. On going through the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004, we find that they do not prescribe any documents for availing .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ey were otherwise not entitled to such credit. 8. The Punjab & Haryana High Court, in the case of Commissioner of Central Excise, Ludhiana vs. Ralson India Ltd., reported in 2006 (202) E.L.T. 759 (P &H) held that if the duty paid has the character of inputs and their receipt in manufacturer's factory and utilization in manufacture of final product is not disputed, then the credit cannot be denied to such person. It is also to be noted that the Department's Circular dated 19th Nov .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 



|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version