Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India. Com TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Acts / Rules Notifications Circulars Tariff/ ITC HSN Forms Case Laws Manuals Short Notes Articles SMS News Highlights
        Home        
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

Atul Limited Versus Commissioners of Central Excise, Customs and Service Tax-Surat-II

2015 (10) TMI 1331 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD

Reversal of CENVAT Credit - Imposition of penalty - Held that:- Appellant took a credit of ₹ 32,19,567/- as per his misunderstanding of Rule 3(7) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004, as per prescribed farmula. However the same was found to be admi .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

Notice and actual amount of ₹ 27,53,997/-, subsequently found to be payable, indicate that there was a confusion even in the mind of Department regarding method of calculating admissible Cenvat Credit under Rule, 3(7) of the Cenvat Credit Rules .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

facts of circumstances, it is not a fit case for imposition of penalty under Rule 15(2) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 read with Section 11AC of the Central Excise Act, 1944 - Decided in favour of assessee. - Appeal No : E/227/2011 - Order No. A/1 .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

10. 2. Sh. R.H. Shah (Manager) of the appellant argued that a Show Cause Notice dt 12/11/2009 was issued to the appellant, inter-alia, demanding reversal of improperly taken Cenvat Credit of ₹ 32,19,567/-. That the credit was improperly calcula .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

se Notice. That appellant has not agitated reversal of credit on merits but is only agitating non imposition of penalty as the entire inadmissible credit was paid back before issue of Show Cause Notice which was also not utilized. That no penalty und .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

redit admissible. Learned Authorised Representative strongly defended the order passed by the first appellate authority. 4. Heard both sides and perused the case records. Appellant took a credit of ₹ 32,19,567/- as per his misunderstanding of R .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

Discussion Forum
what is new what is new
 


Share:            

|| Home || About us || Feedback || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version