Subscription   Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Articles Highlights TMI Notes SMS News Newsletters Calendar Imp. Links Database Experts Contact us More....
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

Commissioner, Central Excise & Service Tax, Ahmedabad-III Versus M/s Vim Traders

2015 (10) TMI 1674 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD

SSI exemption - brand name of others - Benefit of Exemption Notification No.8/2003-CE, dt.01.03.2003 - Imposition of interest and penalty - Held that:- Department failed to establish the owner of the brand name of other person and no person came forw .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

2005. We find that the Respondents had not seriously disputed this fact and therefore, the denial of SSI exemption on merit is justified. - cum-duty benefit and MODVAT Credit were not extended, while quantifying the demand of duty. We find that the C .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

he Commissioner (Appeals) should have examined the issue of limitation in detail and the other claims of the Respondent. - we uphold the demand of duty alongwith interest on merit. - Appeal disposed of. - Appeal No. : E/904/2007-DB - Order No. A/1121 .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

this appeal against the order of Commissioner (Appeals), where the Adjudication order was set aside. 2. After hearing both the sides and on perusal of the records, we find that the Respondents were engaged in the manufacture of Coated and Uncoated M .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

authority denied the benefit of Exemption Notification No.8/2003-CE, dt.01.03.2003 and confirmed the demand of duty alongwith interest and imposed penalty. The Commissioner (Appeals) set aside the Adjudication order. 3. On perusal of the impugned or .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

he record that the Director of M/s Vimal Microns Ltd claimed the ownership of the brand name in December 1995. The period of dispute in the present appeal is April 2004 to March 2005. We find that the Respondents had not seriously disputed this fact .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

what is new what is new
  ↓     bird's eye view     ↓  


|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version