Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India. Com TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Acts / Rules Notifications Circulars Tariff/ ITC HSN Forms Case Laws Manuals Short Notes Articles SMS News Highlights
        Home        
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

Visen Industries Ltd Versus Commissioner of Central Excise, Thane-II

2015 (10) TMI 1682 - CESTAT MUMBAI

Maintainability of the appeal - Waiver of pre deposit - Section 35F - Mandatory pre deposit - Held that:- purported reversal of credit of ₹ 5,63,66,047/- cannot be considered, as the appellant has issued invoices and their customers would have already taken credit of the same. We find these issues will have to be gone into detail at the time of final hearing and cannot be decided at this stage. - keeping in view the provisions of Section 35F as enumerated above, as also the amount confirme .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

CA For the Respondent : Mr Hitesh Shah, Commissioner (AR) ORDER Per: P K Jain: The appellant was issued a show cause notice relating to maintainability of the appeal filed by them in view of the amended provisions of Section 35F of the Central Excise Act, i.e. the appellant has not deposited 7.5% of the disputed demand of duty. 2. The case was heard at length. The learned counsel for the appellant's submission was that the demand consists of two portions. In the first portion, the departmen .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ey have already reversed ₹ 3,44,773/- as a proportionate credit between the dutiable and exempted/trading goods. 3. The learned Commissioner (AR), on the other hand, submitted that it is clear from the order that what is being demanded is the cenvat credit availed by the appellant without receiving any goods in their factory and manipulating the documents so as to show that the goods have been received in the factory. He further submitted that the so called as reversal of the credit is irr .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ing trading activity in a big way and their manufacturing activity is only miniscule and as held by this Tribunal in Mercedes Benz - Appeal No.E/370, 456, 385/11-Mum & E/1019/12-Mum, before 2011 the value of the trading goods has to be taken. Even on that criteria, the demand will be substantial. He submitted that as per Section 35F, the appellant is required to deposit an amount equivalent to 7.5% of the duty demanded and it is clear from the order that only an amount of ₹ 3,44,773/- .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

penalty, where such penalty is in dispute-in pursuance of a decision or an order passed by an officer of Central Excise lower in rank than the [Principal Commissioner of Central Excise or Commissioner of Central Excise]; (ii) against the decision or order referred to in clause (a) of sub-section (1) of section 35B , unless the appellant has deposited seven and a half per cent. of the duty, in case where duty or duty and penalty are in dispute, or penalty, where such penalty is in dispute, in pur .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ovisions of this section shall not apply to the stay applications and appeals pending before any appellate authority prior to the commencement of the Finance (No.2) Act, 2014. Explanation.- For the purposes of this section "duty demanded" shall include,- (i) amount determined under section 11D; (ii) amount of erroneous Cenvat credit taken; (iii) amount payable under rule 6 of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2001 or the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2002 or the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004." 5. We fu .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

er section 11A(2)] of the Central Excise Act, 1944; (ii) I determine an amount of ₹ 1,18,45,107/- (Rupees One Crore Eighteen Lakhs Forty-five Thousand One Hundred Seven only), under Rule 14 read with Rule 6(3)(i) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 200-1 in [reading of Section 11A(10) and Station 11AA of the Central Excise Act, 1944; as payable by M/s. VIsen Industries Ltd., K-30, 31 & 32, MIDC Industrial Area, Tarapur, Boisar, Dist Thane - 401506; (iii) I order that the amount of ₹ 3,44 .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

Discussion Forum
what is new what is new
 


Share:            

|| Home || About us || Feedback || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version