Subscription   Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Articles Highlights TMI Notes SMS News Newsletters Calendar Imp. Links Database Experts Contact us More....
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

Joint Commissioner of Income Tax, LTU, Bangalore Versus M/s. State Bank of Mysore

Penalty under Section 271(1)(c) - irregular notice - Held that:- The Assessing Officer has not specified the relevant portion of the clause (c) of the notice under Section 274 rws 271 of the Act for initiating penalty proceedings under Section 271(1)(c) of the Act for Assessment Years 2006-07 to 2008-09. Therefore, respectfully following the decision of CIT Vs. Manjunatha Cotton & Ginning Factory (2013 (7) TMI 620 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT ) we hold that the notices issued under Section 274 rws 271 .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

For The Respondent : Shri E.S. Nagendra Prasad, CIT (D.R) ORDER Per Bench : These are five appeals, three by the assessee and two by revenue, directed against the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), LTU, Bangalore dt.27.6.2014 substantially confirming the levy of penalty under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (in short 'the Act') by the Assessing Officer for Assessment Years 2006-07 to 2008-09, with partial relief to the assessee. The assessee is in appeal on .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

crutiny and the assessments were completed under Section 143(3) of the Act; wherein the total income was computed by making various additions/disallowances to the income returned. The Assessing Officer also initiated penalty proceedings under Section 271(1)(c) of the Act in the orders of assessment by issue of notices under Section 274 rws 271 of the Act for the three assessment years under consideration. 2.2 The assessee preferred appeals against the orders of assessment before the CIT (Appeals .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

under Section 271(1)(c) of the Act for the three assessment years 2006-07 to 2008-09 under consideration. 2.4 Aggrieved by the orders levying penalty under Section 271(1)(c) of the Act for Assessment Years 2006-07 to 2008-09, the assessee preferred appeals before the CIT (Appeals), LTU, Bangalore. The learned CIT (Appeals) vide the impugned order dt.27.6.2014 passed a common order for the aforesaid three assessment years, confirming the levy of penalty on certain issues and deleting the penalty .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

: Levy of penalty on claiming deduction u/s.36(1)(viia) of the Act for provision for standard assets. 7,33,92,000 14,32,90,620 7,50,87,309 3 Ground No.3 : Levy of penalty for claiming capital expenditure as revenue expenditure. 6,89,404 67,546 70,046 2.6.2 Appeals by Revenue S.No. Issue Penalty levied u/s.271(1)(c). Rs. A.Y. 2006-07 A.Y. 2008-09 1. Delay in remittance and non-deduction of TDS 18,26,077 - 2. Provision for LFC/HTC, Silver Jubillee Awards and Resettlement Expenses. - 2,12,85,488 3 .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

rement of assuming jurisdiction to initiate the proceedings. 3.1 The learned Authorised Representative was heard on the additional ground raised in the appeals for Assessment Years 2006-07 to 2008-09. Before us, the learned Authorised Representative for the assessee placed before the Bench a copy of the decision of the coordinate bench of this Tribunal in the case of M/s. Roadlinks India Pvt. Ltd. in ITA No.1485/Bang/2013 dt.27.2.2015 wherein the Tribunal, on the same issue and in similar circum .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ive also placed before the Bench, for our perusal the original notices issued under Section 274 rws 271 of the Act for Assessment Years 2006-07 to 2008-09 for initiating penalty under Section 271(1)(c) of the Act and placed copies of the same on record. 3.2 The learned Departmental Representative submitted that since the additional ground on the validity of the defective penalty notices is being raised for the first time before the Tribunal, the matter may be remanded back to the authorities bel .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ers Pvt. Ltd. (2013) 218 Taxman 360 has laid down the law in this regard. It was also submitted that the Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of NTPC Ltd. reported in 229 ITR 383 (SC) has held that any question of law arising from the facts on record should be allowed to be raised. It was submitted that the additional ground rasied is in line with the decision of the Hon'ble Apex Court (supra), Hon'ble High Court of Karnataka (supra) and decisions of the co-ordinate benches of this Tribuna .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

Ltd. (supra) has held that the additional ground raised is a purely legal ground and since it goes to the very root of the matter relating to the levy of penalty under Section 271(1)(c) of the Act, it was admitted for consideration and adjudication. The relevant portion of the said order at para 5.1 thereof is extracted hereunder :- 5.1 We have heard both parties and perused and carefully considered the material on record. We find that the additional ground raised by the assessee is a purely le .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

tion is raised, the Tribunal has to consider the same in accordance with law and cannot refuse to entertain the same. 3.4.3 As regards the decision cited by the learned Departmental Representative CIT V Tolaram Hassomal (298 ITR 22) (MP), the co-ordinate bench of this Tribunal in the case of Smt. K.R. Prabhavati in M.P. No.5/Bang/2014 (in ITA No.234/Bang/2011) had occasion to examine the said decision. The co-ordinate bench in its order dt.10.4.2015 observed that the cited decision is not the de .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

own by the jurisdictional High Court viz. Hon'ble High Court of Karnataka in the case of Sankeshwar Printers Pvt. Ltd. (supra) and is also contrary to the decision of the law laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of NTPC Ltd. (supra)……… 3.4.4 In fact, the Hon'ble Madhya Pradesh High Court itself has not followed the decision of Tolaram Hassomal (supra) in its subsequent decisions. The Hon'ble Madhya Pradesh High Court has analysed the powers of t .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ue which was not raised by the assessee either before the Assessing Officer or the learned CIT (Appeals) but was raised for the first time before the Tribunal. The said order has been affirmed by the Hon'ble Apex Court in 168 Taxmann 107. 3.4.5 The Indore Bench of the Tribunal in the case of Basantilal Jain in IT(SS)A No.64/Ind/2007 has examined both the aforesaid decisions of the Hon'ble Madhya Pradesh High Court and at para 4 of its order held that :- 4….……… .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

e Madhya Pradesh High Court in the case of Steel Ingots; 135 CTR 379 held that additional ground requiring no appreciation of facts, Tribunal should have permitted the assessee to raise the question. It was observed that eventual destination of every litigation is justice and as such technicality should not be 12 permitted to prevail as a speed breaker in the case of dispension of justice. Similar view has been taken by the Hon ble High Court of Madhya Pradesh in the case of Bhopal Sugar Mills L .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ecision cited by the learned CIT DR in the case of Tolaram Hassomal (supra), we 13 are inclined to follow the latest decision of the Hon ble jurisdictional High Court decided after considering the decision of Hon ble Supreme Court reported at 267 ITR 654. As all the facts relating the additional legal grounds taken before us are already on record, we are inclined to entertain the additional grounds which are purely legal in nature and accordingly proceed to decide the same. From the above discus .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

under Section 271(1)(c) of the Act for the three assessment years 2006-07 to 2008-09 in the case on hand were valid. In this regard, we have to examine whether the mandatory conditions for initiating the penalty proceedings were complied with or not. One of the mandatory conditions is that the notice under Section 274 rws 271 of the Act must be a valid notice. We, therefore, proceed to examine, consider and adjudicate this ground. 3.5.2 We find that this very issue has been adjudicated by the c .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

blank spaces to be filled up with relevant information and also at the bottom of page 2 of the notice, it is mentioned that inappropriate words and paragraphs are to be deleted. We, however, find that the Assessing Officer except for mentioning the assessment year and striking off para 2 on page 1 of the notice has neither filled up any of the blanks nor struck off any other inappropriate words or portions or paragraphs. Para 4 of the notice on page 2 thereof mentions both concealment of partic .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

of the Act deals with two satisfactions; i.e. concealment of particulars of income or furnishing of inaccurate particulars of income. The Hon'ble Court has held that both these conditions are distinct and different, though at times they may overlap with each other. It was held by their Lordships that the Assessing Officer while issuing notice under section 274 r.w.s. 271 of the Act has to come to the conclusion as to whether it is a case of concealment of income or whether it is a case of f .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

categorically records a finding regarding the existence of any said grounds mentioned therein and then penalty proceedings is initiated, in the notice to be issued under Section 274, they could conveniently refer to the said order which contains the satisfaction of the authority which has passed the order. However, if the existence of the conditions could not be discerned from the said order and if it is a case of relying on deeming provision contained in Explanation-1 or in Explanation- 1(B), .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

t as such he is not liable to pay penalty. The practice of the Department sending a printed form where all the ground mentioned in Section 271 are mentioned would not satisfy requirement of law when the consequences of the assessee not rebutting the initial presumption is serious in nature and he had to pay penalty from 100% to 300% of the tax liability. As the said provisions have to be held to be strictly construed, notice issued under Section 274 should satisfy the grounds which he has to mee .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

lty proceedings also must be for both the offences. But drawing up penalty proceedings for one offence and finding the assessee guilty of another offence or finding him guilty for either the one or the other cannot be sustained in law. It is needless to point out satisfaction of the existence of the grounds mentioned in Section 271(1)(c) when it is a sine qua non for initiation or proceedings, the penalty proceedings should be confined only to those grounds and the said grounds have to be specif .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ral justice and cannot be sustained. Thus once the proceedings are initiated on one ground, the penalty should also be imposed on the same ground. Where the basis of the initiation of penalty proceedings is not identical with the ground on which the penalty was imposed, the imposition of penalty is not valid. The validity of the order of penalty must be determined with reference to the information, facts and materials in the hands of the authority imposing the penalty at the time the order was p .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

er while issuing notice has to come to the conclusion that whether is it a case of concealment of income or is it a case of furnishing of inaccurate particulars. The Apex Court in the case of Ashok Pai reported in 292 ITR 11 at page 19 has held that concealment of income and furnishing inaccurate particulars of income carry different connotations. The Gujarat High Court in the case of MANU ENGINEERING reported in 122 ITR 306 and the Delhi High Court in the case of VIRGO MARKETING reported in 171 .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

at in the case before us also, the Assessing Officer has not specified the relevant portion of the clause ( c ) of the notice under section 274 r.w.s. 271 of the Act for initiating penalty proceedings under section 271(1)(c) of the Act and therefore, as held by the Hon'ble High Court in the case of Manjunatha Cotton & Ginning Factory (supra), the assessee could not have rebutted the initial presumption for initiation of penalty proceedings, which is serious in nature. Respectfully follow .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

only by issuance of a valid notice and therefore when jurisdiction is not validly invoked, then the consequent proceedings are also not valid. Further, it cannot be that the Assessing Officer intended to initiate penalty proceedings for both concealment of particulars of income and furnishing of inaccurate particulars of income as the word used in the notice is OR and not and . In this view of the matter, the defect in issuing the notice under section 274 r.w.s. 271 of the Act dt.31.12.2009 cann .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

what is new what is new
  ↓     Latest Happenings     ↓  

Forum: GST - TRAN1 - filed - Data uploaded with Remarks Processed with Error - Not coming in Electronic credit ledger - need suggession guidance

News: Notification Issued For GST Actionable Claim On Branded Food Products

Highlight: Classification printed computer stationary/manifold Business Forms - to be classified under Chapter Heading 4820.00 or under Chapter Heading 4901.90 - items like A4 sheets, advertisement and job card to be classified under Chapter 49

Forum: GST Invoice

Notification: Seeks to amend notification no. 5/2017- central tax(rate) dated 28.06.2017 to give effect to gst council decisions regarding restriction of refund on corduroy fabrics

Notification: Amendments in the notification No.5/2017- Integrated Tax (Rate) dated the 28th June, 2017.

Notification: Seeks to amend notification no. 2/2017- central tax(rate) dated 28.06.2017 to give effect to gst council decisions regarding gst exemptions

Notification: seeks to exempt Skimmed milk powder, or concentrated milk

Article: Websites of Government Departments need lot of improvement. We are noticing detoriations in them for example, case of website of ITAT.

Notification: Seeks to amend notification no. 2/2017- integrated tax(rate) dated 28.06.2017 to give effect to GST council decisions regarding GST exemptions.

Article: RCM Applicability to persons not liable to get registered us 23(1)

Notification: Seeks to amend notification no. 1/2017- central tax(rate) dated 28.06.2017 to give effect to gst council decisions regarding gst rates

Notification: Seeks to amend notification no. 1/2017- integrated tax(rate) dated 28.06.2017 to give effect to gst council decisions regarding gst rates.

Article: Credit of unsold stock [Section 140(3)] - Actual Credit as well as Notional Credit - Part-I - GST Transitional provisions

News: GST Refund - Blockage of Working Capital of Exporters - earlier also there was a normal blockage of funds for a period of 5-6 months at least

News: Clarification about Transition Credit - ₹ 1.27 lakh crore of credit of Central Excise and Service Tax was lying as closing balance as on 30th June, 2017 - claim of credit of ₹ 65,000 crore is not unexpected

Article: 20 Things You must know about E Way Bills in GST Law

Article: MISTAKES IN DRAFTING

Forum: Duty Drawback- Urgent

Highlight: The Customs and Central Excise Duties Drawback Rules, 2017 and All Industry Rates (AIRs) of Drawback related changes -reg. - Circular

Highlight: The definition of "subsidiary company" or "subsidiary" u/s 2(87) of the Companies Act, 2013 shall come into force w.e.f. 20-9-2017

Highlight: Central Government notified the All Industry Rates of Duty Drawback Schedule w.e.f. 1.10.2017 - Notification

Notification: All Industry Rates of Duty Drawback Schedule w.e.f. 1.10.2017

Circular: Investment by Foreign Portfolio Investors in Corporate Debt Securities Review

Notification: Exemptions on supply of services under UTGST Act

Notification: Rates for supply of services under UTGST Act

Notification: Exemptions on supply of services under IGST Act

Notification: Rates for supply of services under IGST Act

Notification: List of Exempted supply of services under the CGST Act

Notification: Rates for supply of services under CGST Act

Highlight: Acceptance of deposits by companies from its members - conditions relaxed in case of Specified IFSC Public company and a private company - Rule 3 amended

Notification: Rate of exchange of conversion of the foreign currency with effect from 8th September, 2017

News: Tax Payers Advised To Confirm Identities Of Income Tax Search Authorities

Notification: Amendment in Appendix 3 (SCOMET items) to Schedule- 2 of ITC (HS) Classification of Export and Import Items 2012

Notification: The Customs and Central Excise Duties Drawback Rules, 2017

Circular: The Customs and Central Excise Duties Drawback Rules, 2017 and All Industry Rates (AIRs) of Drawback related changes -reg.

News: GST implementation smoother than expected: Jaitley

Forum: 3B mistake

Forum: Input tax credit

Forum: Excise duty credit on finished stock at additional place of business.

Forum: Due date of Filing TRAN-1

Highlight: Diversion of income at source - Joint venture agreement - 97% of the receipt transfer to M/s TRG Industries (P) Ltd. - scope of the agreement - it is diversion by overriding title - not taxable in the hands of assessee - HC

Highlight: Expenditure on eligible projects or schemes u/s 35AC - After 01.04.2017 the legislature desired to withdraw such deduction. - The Union legislature was competent to introduce such amendment - HC

Highlight: Transfer of trading assets at cost price, the profit component also stood transferred to the outgoing Directors, which otherwise belonged to the Company - the fact that AO has made the addition in the hands of the Directors would not make any difference - additions confirmed - HC

Highlight: The interest u/s 234B of the Act cannot go beyond the stage of S.245D(I) before the Settlement Commission - HC

Highlight: Galvanized iron pipe is a different commercial commodity than a iron pipe, therefore the activity of galvanization in our considered opinion amounts to manufacture - Deduction u/s 80-IB allowed - HC

Highlight: Penalty u/s 271C - non deduction of TDS on interest paid to sister concerns in terms of Section 194A - Levy of penalty confirmed - HC

Highlight: Disallowance of interest - reference to section 179 - The legislature has also recognised, that the doctrine of lifting of veil in the matter of tax dues is to be applied to prevent fraud etc. and not where the company has suffered despite its normal bona fide function. - HC

News: RBI Reference Rate for US $

Notification: Amendment in Notification No. S.O. 3118(E), dated the 3rd October, 2016



|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version