Contact us   Feedback   Annual Subscription   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

2015 (10) TMI 2039 - ITAT AHMEDABAD

2015 (10) TMI 2039 - ITAT AHMEDABAD - TMI - Non deduction of tax from salary paid to foreign sales personnel - Held that:- Where the employee discharges his duties outside India and his stay is beyond the prescribed limit to term him resident, the income earned earned upon such discharge of duties outside India would not be within the ambit of term has accrued in India and is deemed to have accrued in India. Therefore, would not be taxable in India. Admittedly, if any income which is not taxable .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

re towards payment of salaries to remaining two employees, is hereby deleted - Decided in favour of assessee.

Disallowance of bad debts written off - Held that:- There is no dispute with regard to the finding that the payment were made in the regular course of business. There is no finding of the authorities below that the payment were not related to the business of the assessee. Under these facts, except in the case of QCS, where the assessee itself has admitted that no invoice was i .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ent : Shri Narendra Singh, Sr.DR ORDER PER SHRI KUL BHARAT, JUDICIAL MEMBER : This appeal by the Assessee is directed against the order of the Ld.Commissioner of Income Tax(Appeals)-I, Baroda [ CIT(A) in short] dated 20/12/2011 pertaining to Assessment Year (AY) 2008-09. The Assessee has raised the following grounds of appeal:- 1. The learned CIT(Appeals) has erred in confirming the learned Assessing Officer s action of disallowing the sum of ₹ 32,19,508 by upholding that in view of non de .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

expenses as pertaining to February and March, 2007 representing telephone bills paid to Tata Indicon. The appellant reserves the right to add/amend/alter the ground of appeal adduced above. 2. Briefly stated facts are that the case of the assessee was picked up for scrutiny assessment and the assessment u/s.143(3) of the Income Tax Act,1961 (hereinafter referred to as the Act ) was framed vide order dated 06/12/2010. While framing the assessment, the AO made addition on account of non-deduction .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

s of the assessee partly allowed the appeal; thereby the ld.CIT(A) directed the AO to allow the credit of TDS of ₹ 1,05,989/-subject to verification and confirmed the disallowance of ₹ 32,19,508/-. Further, the ld.CIT(A) confirmed the disallowance of ₹ 3,54,264/- as made by the AO by invoking the provisions of section 40(a)(ia) of the Act. The ld.CIT(A) also confirmed the disallowance of ₹ 6,84,520/- as made on account of disallowance of bad debts. The ld.CIT(A) further c .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ted out of India who were during the year under consideration non-resident Indian. The income earned and received was out of India, therefore such salary income was not subjected to tax in India. Under these facts, the assessee was justified for not deducting the tax at source. He submitted that the tax can be deducted when the income is taxable in India. The ld.counsel for the assessee, in support of the contention, has placed reliance on the judgement of Hon ble Karnataka High Court rendered i .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

02) 81 ITD 203(Mum) has decided the issue in favour of the Revenue. 4. We have heard the rival submissions, perused the material available on record and gone through the orders of the authorities below. We find that the AO made disallowance on account of non-deduction of Tax. The AO was of the view that the assessee was required to deduct tax on the salary paid to staff (foreign) of ₹ 32,19,508/-. The ld.CIT(A) confirmed the addition by following the decision of the Coordinate Bench in the .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

Accordingly, disallowance of expenditure of ₹ 3,42,187/- is hereby confirmed. In the present case, the undisputed facts are that the salary was paid to the employees who were appointed under the contract of employment at outside India for carrying out the business operations of the assessee-company. The contention of the assessee is that the salary was paid outside India for the services rendered outside India and the persons who were non-resident Indians during the year under appeal. The .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

e Act irrespective of the status of the concerned employees, the same were taxable in India. The only question which requires for consideration is that whether the salary paid to foreign employees was taxable in India. Consequently, the tax was required to be deducted by the assessee. The residential status of any person is determined in accordance with the provisions of section 6 of the Act. The authorities below have not made disallowance on the basis of the status of the assessee. The disallo .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

being Chief Engineer working in a ship, stayed out of India during the relevant period for 227 days and that salary was earned by him was on account of the work discharged by him on board during the said period, which outside the shores of India. The Hon ble High Court after examining the law and judicial pronouncement held that it would emerge that assessee was working outside India for a period of 225 days and the income in question earned by assessee has not accrued in India and is not deemed .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

, if any income which is not taxable in India, would not be liable for tax. In the case in hand, admittedly two of the employees of th appellant worked outside India and were NRI. Therefore, in the light of judgment of Hon ble Karntaka High Court in the case of DIT (Int.Taxn.) Vs. Prahlad Vijendra Rao (supra), the amount of salary paid to such employees would not be taxable in India. The Revenue has not brought to our notice any contrary binding precedent. Therefore, the disallowance of expendit .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

of ₹ 6,84,520/-, mentioned in the page 4 and 5 of the assessment order is taken as subject matter of this ground. 6. The ld. Counsel for the assessee reiterated the submission made before ld.CIT(A). He submitted that the transactions were affected in the normal course of business, therefore, write off the same needs to be allowed. He submitted that in view of judgment of the Hon ble Apex Court rendered I the case of T.R.F. Ltd., now the assessee is not required to demonstrate that debt act .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ailable on record and gone through the orders of the authorities below. The ld.CIT(A) had confirmed the disallowance by observing as under: 5.2 I have considered the submissions. Except for payment to QCS, all other payments are claimed to be made on behalf of other parties, which due to non payment by the said parties, were written off. In view of this, the claim is not of bad debts u/s 36(l)(vii) but is of business loss . Appellant has not been able to file any evidence in support of the said .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

as dealt with the issue vide para 6 of the assessment order. The break up ofRs.6,84,250 is as under. Date Name of the party Amount Remarks 15-09-07 Velji Dosabhai & Sons P Ltd. 6,250 Amount was recoverable towards clearing and forwarding charges paid in financial year 2004-05. The party did not pay the amount and hence the same is written off. 31-12-2007 Polychem Corporation 10,060 Amount was recoverable towards payment for purchase of consumable stores made in financial year 2004-05. The pa .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 



|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version