GST Helpdesk   Subscription   Demo   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

2015 (10) TMI 2065 - CESTAT NEW DELHI

2015 (10) TMI 2065 - CESTAT NEW DELHI - TMI - Valuation - Inclusion of amount of sales tax retained - Held that:- During the relevant period there was CBEC Circular dated 30.06.2000 which provides that any amount of concession on sales tax retained by the respondent is not required to be added in the assessable value and there are certain judicial pronouncements of this Tribunal holding the same view in the case of Kinetic Engineering Ltd. (2012 (6) TMI 168 - CESTAT, MUMBAI) and Life Long India .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

spondents are not imposable. - Matter remanded back - Decided in favour of assessee. - Appeal No. E/60423/2013-EX(DB) - Dated:- 19-8-2015 - Ashok Jindal, Member (J) And B Ravichandran, Member (T) For the Appellant : Shri M S Negi, DR For the Respondent : Shri Punit Agarwal, Adv ORDER Per Ashok Jindal Revenue is in appeal against the impugned order. 2. The facts of the case are that respondent is manufacturer of excisable goods and registered with Central Excise department as well as Haryana Sale .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

the Haryana Government. The case of the Revenue is that amount retained by the respondent who form part of the Income on account of sales tax are required to be added in the assessable value of the goods sold by them in terms of Section 4 (3) (d) of Central Excise Act, 1944. Therefore, respondents are liable to pay duty on the amount of sales tax retained by the respondent. The show cause notice was issued to the respondent by extending the period of limitation and demand of duty and also penalt .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

es tax subsidy from the Government of Haryana. Further, it was revealed that amount of Sales Tax has been collected from the buyers / customers and retained by the respondent as per the tax waiver scheme of the Government of Haryana. Therefore, it was alleged that the amount retained by the respondents should form part of income on account of sale of goods and required to be added in the assessable value of the goods sold by them in terms of section 4(3)(d) of Central Excise Act 1944. Therefore, .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

sion of this Tribunal in the case of Kinetic Engineering Ltd. Vs. CCE Pane, Nagpur-2012 (283) ELT 229 (Tri-Mum) . The respondent are not liable to pay duty or to be added in the assessable value the amount of sales tax concession retained by them. Aggrieved from the said orders Revenue is before us. 4. Heard the parties. Considered the submission. 5. The issue has been settled by the Hon'ble Apex Court in the Case of Maruti Suzuki India Ltd. Vs. CCE Delhi-2014 (307) ELT 625 (SC) and Super Sy .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 



|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version