Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India. Com TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Acts / Rules Notifications Circulars Tariff/ ITC HSN Forms Case Laws Manuals Short Notes Articles SMS News Highlights
        Home        
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

Mr. Maninder Singh Bedi Versus A.C.I.T., Central Circle-11, Delhi

2015 (10) TMI 2119 - ITAT DELHI

Power of CIT(A) to enhance the assessment u/s. 251(2) - enhancement in the sale consideration for the computation of capital gain - Held that:- CIT(A) issued notice u/s. 251(2) regarding enhancement in the sale consideration for the computation of capital gain is based on the sale of another floor of the same property, i.e., second floor. The assessee has placed no material on record to substantiate the sale proceeds of basement declared by it and consequential capital loss. The value of propert .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

f the property, appears to have given reasonable rebate while determining the sale value of basement at ₹ 1,58,25,000/- and after deducting indexed cost of property of ₹ 27,32,360/- worked out the capital gains at ₹ 1,30,92,640/- as against ₹ 19,09,720/- computed by the Assessing Officer. Accordingly, we find no justification to disturb the enhancement made by the ld. CIT(A) of ₹ 1,20,82,920/- to the total income of the assessee. Decided against the assessee.
< .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ank. We, therefore, find no justification to interfere with the finding of the ld. CIT(A) that it is absurd to believe that somebody will withdraw cash from the bank, keep it idle with him and then deposit the same in the bank, particularly when no purpose for withdrawal was declared by the assessee before the authorities below. - Decided against the assessee. - ITA No. 5118/Del./2012 - Dated:- 5-10-2015 - Shri I. C. Sudhir , Judicial Member And Shri L. P. Sahu, Accountant Member For the Appella .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ony, New Delhi to ₹ 1,58,25,000/- as against actual sale of ₹ 11,00,000/-. Thus, an addition of ₹ 1,20,82,920/- has been made as against loss of ₹ 15,58,784/-. 2. On the facts and circumstances of the case, the learned CIT(Appeal) has erred in confirming an addition of ₹ 3,10,000/- made by the learned Assessing Officer on account of cash deposits in the Bank and ignoring the cash withdrawal from the same Bank. 2. The facts of the case are that the case of the assess .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ed its return of income only in response to notice u/s. 153A of the Act. In the return of income, the assessee had claimed long term capital loss on property sale of ₹ 15,58,484/-. For legitimate claim of loss, the assessee was required to submit the return of income on or before the due date. The due date of filing of return of income for the assessment year 2005-06 was 31.07.2005, but no return was filed. Therefore, the claim of the assessee on account of long term capital loss was not f .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

essee entered into an agreement for re-construction of this property on which enhancement was to be made by the builder. Therefore, the cost of acquisition in the hands of the assessee was the same as he received at the time of transfer in his name. The appellant received a consideration of ₹ 11,00,000/- for sale of basement of this property and while computing capital gain arising out of this property, the cost of acquisition was computed on the higher side and accordingly the assessee co .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

rm capital gain and the same was assessed in his hands as income from long-term capital gains. During the course of assessment proceedings, the assessee filed (i) copy of gift deed (ii) copy of collaboration agreement (iii) copy of sale deed (iv) valuation report made by the registered valuer as on 01.04.1981 and cost of construction for 2003-04. The AO had made assessment accordingly. 3. Against the order of the AO, the assessee preferred an appeal before the learned CIT(A). After considering t .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

n of the property is 274 Sq. Yards. It means basement, ground floor, first floor and second floor is of 1644 Sq. ft. each. The second floor of the property with entire terrace right had been sold to one Mr. Naveen Goel S/o Late Shri S.R. Goel and Mrs. Vicky Goel w/o Sh. Naveen Goel, resident of 152, Madhuvan, New Delhi-110 092 for ₹ 1.20 crores and registered accordingly. In search operation, another agreement was found dated 09.10.2006 for sale of the same property to the same person Shri .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

of ₹ 1,20,82,920/- in the capital gain computed by the Assessing Officer. 4. During the assessment proceedings, the AO also found cash deposit in bank account for ₹ 3,10,000/-. According to the AO, the assessee could not give proper explanation. He, therefore, added the above unexplained deposit in the bank account to the total income of the assessee. The ld. CIT(A) also confirmed the above addition made by the Assessing Officer on account of cash deposited in the bank account. 5. T .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

he submitted necessary documents of sale proceeds of property before the search team and offered the same for taxation, as while filing his return of income, he had not declared the capital gain on the sale proceeds of property as it was loss from the sale of basement. He also contended that neither the Assessing Officer nor the Appellate Authority has a technical knowhow except valuation by the valuer on which it may be determined that the value of basement was not more than ₹ 11 lacs, fo .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

eal is made by the assessee before the CIT(A). Thus, the acquisition cost taken by the Assessing Officer as ₹ 92,280/- is not correct whereas the cost of construction of the basement is ₹ 11,84,000/- as valued by the registered government valuer. 6. Similarly with respect to cash deposit in the bank account, it was submitted that the assessee has withdrawn cash from bank and deposited it into the bank account frequently and also submitted the cash flow statement before the authoritie .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

the assessee- (i) on any distribution of assets on the total or partial partition of a Hindu undivided family; (ii) under a gift or will; (iii) (a) by succession, inheritance or devolution, or (b) on any distribution of assets on the dissolution of a firm, body of individuals, or other association of persons, where such dissolution had taken place at any time before the 1st day of April, 1987, or (c) on any distribution of assets on the liquidation of a company, or (d) under a transfer to a revo .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

revious owner of the property acquired it, as increased by the cost of any improvement of the assets incurred or borne by the previous owner or the assessee, as the case may be. Explanation.-In this sub-section the expression "previous owner of the property" in relation to any capital asset owned by an assessee means the last previous owner of the capital asset who acquired it by a mode of acquisition other than that referred to in clause (i) or clause (ii) or clause (iii) or clause (i .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

Discussion Forum
what is new what is new
 


Share:            

|| Home || About us || Feedback || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version