Subscription   Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Articles Highlights TMI Notes SMS News Newsletters Calendar Imp. Links Database Experts Contact us More....
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

M/s. Sabero Organics Gujarat Limited Versus Commissioner of Central Excise & S.T., Vapi

2015 (10) TMI 2195 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD

Evasion of duty - Clandestine removal of goods - Whether the case of clandestine removal can be held to be established on the basis of statement dated 12.09.2006 of Shri Rajesh R. Patel, Excise Executive and Authorised Signatory of the appellant - Held that:- There is no other corroborative evidence or statement given by any other person to substantiate that there was any clandestine removal on the part of the appellant. It has been rightly pointed out by the learned advocated appearing on behal .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

g subsequent investigation conducted, by recording statement dated 11.08.2009 of Shri S.R.B. Nair, Chief Operating Officer and Director of the appellant, also explains the case of the appellant that there was no shortage of finished goods. - there is even no confessional statement of the appellant, because the very first statement at 12.09.2006 convey that duty was paid voluntary in good faith with a scope to explain shortages later. Rather the shortages detected during the visit of the officers .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

independent corroborative evidence and after perusal of the case records it is to be held that shortages and clandestine removal of the finished goods are not established and are solely based on presumptions and assumptions. - Decided in favour of assessee. - Appeal No. E/326/2010, E/11270/2013 - ORDER No. A/10894-10895/2015 - Dated:- 29-6-2015 - Mr. H.K. Thakur, Hon ble Member (Technical),J. For the Appellant : Shri Anand Mishra, Advocate For the Respondent : Shri S.K. Shukla, Authorised Repre .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

tages found may be on accounting error with no clandestine intention to evade payment of duty and that he is not able to explain the shortages. It was also submitted that appellant is reversing the duty voluntarily in good faith with a scope to explain the same. 2. Appeal No. E/326/2010 has been filed by the appellant with respect to refund of ₹ 11,40,458/- paid during investigation. The said refund claim was returned to the appellant as premature as per order dated 09.09.2009 of the adjud .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

plain the shortages. Learned Advocate made the Bench go through the correspondence exchanged between the appellant and the department through letters dated 16.09.2006, 19.08.2009 and subsequent statement dated 11.08.2009 of Shri S.R.B. Nair, Chief Operating Officer and Director of the appellant, wherein he explained the shortages. It was the case of the appellant that the shortages detected by the officers of Central Excise during their visit on 11/12.09.2006 could not explain at that moment but .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

t be said to be a confessional statement given by the appellant. 4. Shri S.K. Shukla (AR) appearing on behalf of the Revenue argued that the statement given regarding shortages of finished goods and later explanation given has to be considered as an afterthought. He relied upon the case law of Majestic Auto Limited vs. CCE, Ghaziabad [2004 (172) ELT 391 (Tri. Del.)]. 5. Heard both sides and perused the case records. The issue involved in the present proceedings is whether the case of clandestine .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

in good faith with a scope to explain the shortages. By a letter dated 16.09.2006 appellant, within a week s time of Panchnama, explained the department that there was no shortages as several materials are lying spread over everywhere in the factory premises, which are rejected as well as returned goods. No verification was made during investigation with respect to the claim made by the appellant. During subsequent investigation conducted, by recording statement dated 11.08.2009 of Shri S.R.B. .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

shortages later. Rather the shortages detected during the visit of the officers of Central Excise were intimated as non-existing by a letter within a week from the date of visit. To reject the appellant s claim of no shortage of finished goods, a verification ought to have been done immediately. Learned AR relied upon the judgment of Majestic Auto Limited vs. CCE, Ghaziabad where the explanation was offered after two months and after physical verification by the department, was held to be inadm .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

what is new what is new
  ↓     bird's eye view     ↓  


|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version