Subscription   Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Articles Highlights TMI Notes SMS News Newsletters Calendar Imp. Links Database Experts Contact us More....
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

The Commissioner of Central Excise And Service Tax Versus M/s Kannappa Corporation

2015 (11) TMI 168 - MADRAS HIGH COURT

Imposition of penalty u/s 76, 77 & 78 - Maintainability of appeal - Monetary limit - Held that:- Revisional order came to be passed by the Commissioner of Central Excise, Trichy, vide order dated 13.12.2007, imposing penalty of ₹ 200/- per day under section 76 of Finance Act, 1994 and also a penalty of ₹ 1,000/- under Section 77 of the Finance Act, 1994. The Commissioner also imposed a penalty of ₹ 1,49,170/- on the assessee under Section 78 of the Finance Act, 1994. Therefore, .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

. J Shankar Raman JUDGMENT ( Judgment of the Court was delivered by R. Sudhakar, J. ) Aggrieved by the order passed by the Tribunal in allowing the appeal filed by the assessee, the Revenue/appellant is before this Court by filing the present appeal. This appeal was admitted by this Court, on 16.07.2010, on the following substantial questions of law :- "1. Whether the Hon'ble CESTAT is right in setting aside the penalties imposed under Sections 78, 76 and 77 of the Finance Act, 1994 by .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

n it has been admitted by the assessee that they had rendered the cargo handling services and were liable for paying service tax on the said service, especially when they had not agitated the order of the Original Authority confirming the demand of service tax on the cargo handling service rendered by them ? 3. Whether the Hon'ble CESTAT is right in settting aside the penalties in a case where the intention to evade payment of service tax was established and thereby obviated the applicabilit .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

age and transportation of fertilizers of M/s. Oswal Chemicals and Fertilizers Limited, who are having their factory at Paradeep, Orissa and their head office at New Delhi. On the basis of information received that the assessee was not discharging appropriate Service Tax on the remuneration received towards the services provided by the assessee to M/s. Oswal Chemicals and Fertilizers Ltd. for the purpose of handling despatches of Urea / DAP / NKP by railways, the officers attached to the Madurai .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

03-2004 and 2004-2005. After due process of law, the Order in Original No:04/2007-Service Tax dated 29.03.2007 came to be passed demanding a sum of ₹ 1,49,170/- (service tax of ₹ 1,48,513/- + Ed. Cess of ₹ 657/-) under Section 73 (2) of Chapter V of Finance Act, 1994. The Original Authority also appropriated the service tax amount of ₹ 1,47,816/- already paid by the assessee and demanded the balance sum of ₹ 1,354/-. 3. Subsequently, the Commissioner of Central Exci .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ection 77 of the Finance Act, 1994. The Commissioner also imposed a penalty of ₹ 1,49,170/- on the assessee under Section 78 of the Finance Act, 1994. 4. Against the said order, the respondent/assessee preferred appeal to the Tribunal. The Tribunal, on considering the facts of the case, allowed the appeal filed by the assessee, against which the appellant/Department has preferred the present appeal. 5. Learned counsel appearing for the respondent/assessee raised a preliminary objection as .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

evenue including fine and penalty is ₹ 1 Lakh and below. Similarly, in the case of High Courts, appeals should not be filed in cases where the duty involved or total revenue including fine or penalty is ₹ 2 Lakhs and below. While deciding the thresholds mentioned above the duty involved shall be the decisive element. For example, in a case involving duty of ₹ 1 Lakh with mandatory penalty of ₹ 1 Lakh besides any other penalty imposed under the relevant provisions of Law, .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

f the monetary limit exceeds ₹ 2 Lakhs, appeal can be filed. Since the monetary limit in the present case, even as per the order of the Commissioner (Appeals) is well within the limit of ₹ 2 Lakhs, the present appeal, filed by the Department, is not maintainable. 7. Learned standing counsel appearing for the Department submitted that the appeal was admitted on 25.3.2010 and the National Litigation Policy of the Government was issued by the Ministry of Finance, Department of Revenue, .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

e the appeal was admitted on 25.3.2010. Therefore, there was nothing wrong in the Department filing the appeal. However, it is to be pointed out that the main reason for bringing into effect the National Litigation Policy is to reduce Government litigation so that the Government ceases to be a compulsive litigant. The purpose underlying this Policy is to ensure that valuable time of the Courts is spent in resolving pending cases and in bringing down the average pendency time in the Courts and to .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

what is new what is new
  ↓     bird's eye view     ↓  


|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version