GST Helpdesk   Subscription   Demo   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

2015 (11) TMI 478 - CESTAT MUMBAI

2015 (11) TMI 478 - CESTAT MUMBAI - TMI - Penalty u/s 78 - Business Support Service - Misdeclaration - Held that:- Appellant had mis-declared the taxable receipts in respect of the transactions which were declared by them to the authorities while filing ST-3 returns, is not disputed. This act itself indicates that the appellant had ulterior motive in suppressing and mis-declaring the taxable transactions. The argument by the learned Counsel before us that the services rendered by them are not ta .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

se as the appellant was a registered unit with the authorities. - impugned order which imposes penalty under Section 78 is correct and does not require any interference. - Decided against assessee. - APPEAL No.ST/363/11-Mum - Dated:- 6-8-2015 - Mr. M.V. Ravindran, Member (Judicial) And Mr. C.J. Mathew, Member (Technical) For the Petitioner : Ms. Aparna Hirandagi, Advocate For the Respondent : Shri A.K. Goswani, Addl. Commr (AR) ORDER Per: M.V. Ravindran This appeal is directed against Order-in-O .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ement, Maintenance & Repair Service (vii) Erection, Commissioning & Installation Service and (viii) Business Auxiliary Service. Show cause notice was issued for demand of service tax, interest thereof and for imposition of penalties. The appellant contested the show cause notice on merits and also on limitation. The adjudicating authority did not agree with contention raised by the appellant and after following due process of law, confirmed the demand with interest and imposed penalty un .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

volved actual cost and that they are not a commercial concern; tax liability under Business Support Service is incorrect as they had undertaken printing of bills in the premises of their customers by deploying their own printer and personnel. On an identical issue, DGCEI had issued a show cause notice hence question of invoking extended period of limitation does not arise; the reimbursement of actual corporate expenses recovered from their sister concern is also incorrect as it is not a case of .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

etting aside the penalties imposed by the adjudicating authority. She would submit that the provision of section 80 can be invoked in this case as appellant had bonafide belief of non-taxability of the services rendered by them. 4. Learned departmental representative would submit that the tax liability would have escaped had the department not undertaken a detailed investigation. It is his submission that the appellant being a unit registered with the service tax authorities should have, in case .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 



|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version