Subscription   Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Articles Highlights TMI Notes SMS News Newsletters Calendar Imp. Links Database Experts Contact us More....
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

The Commissioner of Income Tax, The Asst. Commissioner of Income-Tax Versus M/s KBD Sugars & Distilleries Ltd.

2015 (11) TMI 648 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT

Disallowance of business loss and unabsorbed depreciation - whether the period of three years as prescribed u/s.72A(2)(a)(i) of the Act has to be computed including the period of setting up of business and not from the date of commencement of actual production? - Held that:- In the present case, the licence for setting up business of power generation, loans for the same, construction of the building and purchase of machinery etc., had started from the year 2000 itself, which was duly reflected i .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

hough the production or generation of power, i.e., the commencement of business may have been with effect from 08.08.2003.

We may also mention that Section 72A of the Act provides for set off of accumulated loss and unabsorbed depreciation, which is for the benefit of the assessee-amalgamated company. Thus, in our view, when a provision is for the benefit of an assessee, it should be liberally interpreted in favour of the assessee which has to be given the benefit of such provision. I .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

the Revenue challenging the order of the Tribunal dated 10.07.2009. The brief facts of this case are that the respondent-Company is engaged in the business of manufacture of beer, IML and speed zone. By an amalgamation Scheme, which was approved by the High Courts of Karnataka and Andhra Pradesh vide orders dated 08.03.2006 and 17.04.2006 respectively, M/s. Shree Vani Sugars and Industries Ltd., (hereinafter referred to as the Amalgamating Company ) amalgamated with the respondent-assessee M/s.K .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

business income of ₹ 24,64,96,704/- and the brought forward losses of the amalgamating company, being ₹ 21,33,48,234/-, were set off against the above income. Out of the aforesaid business loss of amalgamating company, which was set off against the income of the respondent-amalgamated company for the relevant assessment year, the Assessing Officer disallowed the business loss and unabsorbed depreciation amounting to ₹ 3,48,87,613/- as the same was the business loss from the bu .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

sarathi, appearing along with Ms.Jenita Chatterji, learned counsel for the respondent and perused the record. 4. This appeal was Admitted on 02.06.2010 for considering the following questions of law: i. Whether the Appellate Authorities were correct in holding that the period of three years as prescribed u/s.72A(2)(a)(i) of the Act has to be computed including the period of setting up of business and not from the date of commencement of actual production? ii. Whether the Appellate authorities we .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

een carrying on the business of manufacturing of sugar for the past several years but it had commenced its business of power generation only on 08.08.2003, which was within three years of the amalgamation, and thus the benefit of carrying forward of such losses of the amalgamating company could not be granted in favour of the assessee-amalgamated company. It is contended that even though the activities for establishing the power generation unit may have commenced earlier, but the benefit of Sect .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

power generation unit of the amalgamating company, the same could not be allowed. In support of his submission, learned counsel has submitted that Section 32 of the Act, which deals with depreciation where the tangible assets are used for purposes of business engaged in generation or generation and distribution of power, and as such the depreciation is to be granted only when the asset is actually used for such purpose. 6. Per contra, Sri Parthasarathy, learned counsel for the respondent-amalga .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ven though the commercial production or generation of power may have commenced from 08.08.2003, but it was engaged in the business of power generation from the year 2000, for which evidence had been duly adduced before the authorities below. 7. For proper perusal of this case, the relevant Sub-sections (1) and (2) of Section 72A of the Act are reproduced below: Sec.72A: Provisions relating to carry forward and set off of accumulated loss and unabsorbed depreciation allowance in amalgamation or d .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

hing contained in any other provision of this Act, the accumulated loss and the unabsorbed depreciation of the amalgamating company shall be deemed to be the loss or, as the case may be, allowance for unabsorbed depreciation of the amalgamated company for the previous year in which the amalgamation was effected, and other provisions of this Act relating to set off and carry forward of loss and allowance for depreciation shall apply accordingly. (2) Notwithstanding anything contained in sub-secti .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

of amalgamation; (b) the amalgamated company- (i) holds continuously for a minimum period of five years from the date of amalgamation at least three-fourths of the book value of fixed assets of the amalgamating company acquired in a scheme of amalgamation; (ii) continues the business of the amalgamating company for a minimum period of five years from the date of amalgamation; (iii) fulfils such other conditions as may be prescribed to ensure the revival of the business of the amalgamating compa .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ute that the amalgamating company was in business since 1984. It is admitted that in the year 2000, the amalgamating company had started work for establishment of power generation business and after establishing the unit, the power generation or such business had commenced from 08.08.2003. 9. In our view, commencement of business would be different from engaged in business . It is the latter phrase which has been used in Section 72A(2)(a). Commencement of business may be from the date when produ .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ning thereby, after business commences, which is different from engagement in business. This, to our understanding, only clarifies that the phrases commencement of business and engaged in business are different. Former may apply for Section 32 but the latter would apply in the case of Section 72A of the Act. 11. In the present case, the licence for setting up business of power generation, loans for the same, construction of the building and purchase of machinery etc., had started from the year 2 .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

what is new what is new
  ↓     bird's eye view     ↓  


|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version