Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India. Com TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Acts / Rules Notifications Circulars Tariff/ ITC HSN Forms Case Laws Manuals Short Notes Articles SMS News Highlights
        Home        
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

M/s Ambejogai Peoples Co-operative Bank Ltd. Versus Commissioner of Central Excise, Aurangabad

2015 (11) TMI 1105 - CESTAT MUMBAI

Denial of CENVAT Credit - Banking and other Financial Services - Some of the services are partially exempted vide Notification No. 29/2005-Service Tax dated 22.2.2004 read with Valuation Rules - Held that:- issue is full covered by Josts Engineering (2013 (8) TMI 463 - CESTAT MUMBAI) and also in the case of Nagar Urban Co-operative Bank Ltd. (2014 (7) TMI 117 - CESTAT MUMBAI). I find that the appellants case is squarely covered as in earlier order[2015 (11) TMI 952 - CESTAT MUMBAI]. Further, t .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

e balance amount alongwith interest. It is also held that the Banking and other Financial Service, which are the output service of the appellant are not fully exempted and accordingly, do not fall under the category of exempt service as defined under Rule 2(e) of the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004. - Matter remanded back - Decided in favour of assessee. - Appeal No. ST/88531/14 - Final Order No. A/2465/2015-WZB/SMB - Dated:- 11-5-2015 - Shri Anil Choudhary, Member (Judicial) For the Petitioner : Shri .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

tion Rules. The show-cause notice dated 13.06.2013 was issued to the appellant for the period April, 2008 to March, 2011 on the allegation that the appellant having availed input tax, and the output services being partially exempted were required to either maintain separate account or pay output tax @ 6% under Rule 6(3), on the exemption portion of the service under the head Banking and other Financial Services. Vide Order-in-Original dated 25.02.2014 passed by the Addl. Commissioner of Central .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

g with interest and the same was repaid by challans, a copy of which is annexed at pages 9 to 16 of the paper-book. In this view of the matter, the whole input service credit was reversed relating to common input service. Therefore, there was no question of any tax payable under Rule 6(3) of the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004. The learned Commissioner (Appeals) confirmed the demand alongwith penalty and interest relying on the ruling of the Hon'ble Bombay High Court in the case of Nicholas Pirama .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

in the case of Nagar Urban Co-operative Bank Ltd. - 2014-TIOL-929-CESTAT-MUM, after considering the decision of this Tribunal in the case of Jost s Engineering Co. Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise, Mumbai III 2013-TIOL-732-CESTAT-MUM and also the ruling of the Hon'ble Bombay High Court in the case of Nichlas Piramal (supra) has granted the stay in similar facts and circumstances, taking note that Rule 6(3) has been amended retrospectively by Finance Act, 2010 and the Tribunal in the .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

Discussion Forum
what is new what is new
 


Share:            

|| Home || About us || Feedback || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version