Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India. Com TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Acts / Rules Notifications Circulars Tariff/ ITC HSN Forms Case Laws Manuals Short Notes Articles SMS News Highlights
        Home        
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

Sri Rampada Panda Versus I.T.O., Ward-2, Haldia.

2015 (11) TMI 1128 - ITAT KOLKATA

Addition u/s 40A(3) - cash payment - Held that:- The purpose of section 40A(3) is only preventive and to check evasion of tax and flow of unaccounted money or to check transactions which are not genuine and may be put as camouflage to evade tax by showing fictitious or false transactions. Admittedly, this is not the case in the facts of the assessee herein. The assessee had directly deposited cash in the bank account of the supplier M/s Pickme Feeds which fact is also acknowledged by the concern .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

e interpreted liberally.

Thus we have no hesitation in deleting the addition made in the sum of ₹ 62,06,269/- u/s 40A(3) of the Act. - Decided in favour of assessee. - ITA No.67/Kol/2013 - Dated:- 7-10-2015 - Hon ble Shri M.Balaganesh, AM & Shri S.S.Vishwanetra Ravi, JM] For The Appellant : Shri Manish Tiwari, FCA For The Respondent : Shri Pinaki Mukherjee, JCIT ORDER Per Shri M.Balaganesh, AM 1. This appeal of the assessee arises out of the order of the Learned CIT(A) in Ap .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

asanti Distributors engaged in the retail trading of poultry feeds . During the assessment year under appeal, the assessee made cash payments in excess of ₹ 20,000/- to a party M/s Pickme Feeds to the tune of ₹ 62,06,269/-. The books of accounts were not produced by the assessee before the Learned AO. Only certain details such as bank statements, debtors list, purchasers name and address, copy of debit vouchers regarding carriage outwards, inventory details were produced for verifica .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

allowed u/s 40A(3) of the Act which was also confirmed by the Learned CITA. Aggrieved, the assessee is in appeal before us on the following grounds:- 1(a) That on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, Ld. CIT(Appeals) has erred in confirming the action of Assessing Officer who made disallowance u/s 40A(3) by referring to cash receipts recorded in assessee s ledger maintained by Pickme Fees. 1(b) That on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, Ld. CIT(A) is not justified in sust .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

R argued on behalf of the assessee and Shri.Pinaki Mukherjee, JCIT, the Learned DR argued on behalf of the revenue. 3.2. The Learned AR argued that the poultry feeds are made out of maize and soya and hence come under the ambit of agricultural produce and accordingly his case is covered under the exceptions provided in Rule 6DD(e)(i) of the Income Tax Rules, 1962 as payment is made for procuring agricultural produce. He also argued that the payments made for purchase of produce of animal husband .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

of poultry feeds to the farmers in the rural areas and the business expediency in this entire gamut of transactions and the genuineness of the same are never doubted by the revenue. The Learned AR argued that the supplier of poultry feeds M/s Pickme Feeds had deputed their representatives to the assessee s customer location ( i.e parties to whom poultry feeds is sold by the assessee) and received the sale proceeds directly from the said customer and deposited the same in the bank account of M/s .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

M/s Pickme Feeds wherein the concerned supplier had mandated to receive only cash payments in order to have uninterrupted supply of poultry feeds to the assessee on a timely basis and in the event of payment by cheques, the supply of goods to the assessee would be made only after clearance of the cheques. He also argued that since the payments were directly deposited in the bank account of M/s Pickme Feeds by the supplier deputing his representatives to collect the sale proceeds of the assessee .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

d. We find that though the assessee had raised three grounds on this issue but all the grounds centre only around the disallowance u/s 40A(3) of the Act and hence they are taken up together. Admittedly, the assessee had made payments to M/s Pickme Feeds in cash by directly depositing cash in the bank account of M/s Pickme Feeds for supply of poultry feeds to the assessee. The assessee in turn supplies the poultry feeds to various farmers in the rural areas. It is observed that the assessee in te .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

resaid party by the assessee. 3.3.1. We are not in agreement with the argument of the Learned AR that the payment is made to an agent and that the relationship of the assessee with this supplier is one of principal and agent and as such, the assessee s case falls under the exception provided in Rule 6DD(k) of IT Rules. However, we are in agreement with the arguments of the Learned AR that the purchase of poultry feeds falls under the exceptions clause provided in Rule 6DD(e) of the Income Tax Ru .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

h articles, produce or products. 3.3.2. We also agree the pressing emergency for the assessee to make payments in cash to M/s Pickme Feeds as the assessee was operating only in co-operative bank in his village which was practically taking 5-6 days for clearing a single cheque issued by the assessee to his suppliers and hence the supplier had insisted for payments in cash for uninterrupted and timely supplies of poultry feeds for onward supply of the same by the assessee to the farmers in the rur .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ot disputed by the revenue. It will be pertinent to go into the intention behind introduction of provisions of section 40A(3) of the Act at this juncture. We find that the said provision was inserted by Finance Act 1968 with the object of curbing expenditure in cash and to counter tax evasion. The CBDT Circular No. 6P dated 6.7.1968 reiterates this view that this provision is designed to counter evasion of a tax through claims for expenditure shown to have been incurred in cash with a view to fr .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

d bank draft (except in specified cases) is not arbitrary and does not amount to a restriction on the fundamental right to carry on business. If read together with Rule 6DD of the Income-tax Rules, 1962, it will be clear that the provisions are not intended to restrict business activities. There is no restriction on the assessee in his trading activities. Section 40A(3) only empowers the Assessing Officer to disallow the deduction claimed as expenditure in respect of which payment is not made by .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

satisfaction of the Assessing officer the circumstances under which the payment in the manner prescribed in section 40A(3) was not practicable or would have caused genuine difficulty to the payee. It is also open to the assessee to identify the person who has received the cash payment. Rule 6DD provides that an assessee can be exempted from the requirement of payment by a crossed cheque or crossed bank draft in the circumstances specified under the rule. It will be clear from the provisions of s .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ty of transactions, rate of gross profit or the fact that the bonafide of the assessee that payments are made to producers of hides and skin are also neither doubted nor disputed by the AO. On the basis of these facts it is not justified on the part of the AO to disallow 20% of the payments made u/s 40A(3) in the process of assessment. We, therefore, delete the addition of ₹ 17,90,571/- and ground no.1 is decided in favour of the assessee. CIT vs Crescent Export Syndicate in ITA No. 202 of .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

the payment being made by bearer cheque these goods could not have been procured and it would have hampered the supply of goods within the stipulated time. Therefore, the genuineness of the purchase has been accepted by the ld. CIT(Appeal) which has also not been disputed by the department as it appears from the order so passed by the learned Tribunal. It further appears from the assessment order that neither the Assessing Officer nor the CIT(Appeal) has disbelieved the genuineness of the transa .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

essee s co-operative bank would not do, since realization took longer time and such payments should be made only in cash in their bank account - If assessee would not make cash payment and make cheque payments alone, it would have received recharge vouchers delayed by 4/5 days which would severely affect its business operation - Assessee, therefore, made cash payment - Whether in view of above, no disallowance under section 40A (3) was to be made in respect of payment made to principal - Held, y .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

and also gave incentives and discounts - Further, seller also issued certificate in support of this - Whether since assessee had placed proof of payment of consideration for its transaction to seller, and later admitted payment and there was no doubt about genuineness of payment, no disallowance could be made under section 40A(3) - Held, yes [ Para 23] [In favour of the assessee] CIT vs Smt. Shelly Passi reported in (2013) 350 ITR 227 (P&H) In this case the court upheld the view of the tribu .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

rb the evasion of tax and inculcating the banking habits. Therefore, the consequence, which were to befall on account of non-observation of section 40A(3) must have nexus to the failure of such object. Therefore, the genuineness of the transactions it being free from vice of any device of evasion of tax is relevant consideration. In the instant case, the cash has been deposited directly in the bank account of the supplier i.e M/s Pickme Feeds by the assessee. 3.3.6. The Hon ble Apex Court in the .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

he consequence that befall for non-compliance with such provisions intended for preventing the tax evasion with the object of provision before the consequence can be inflicted upon the defaulter. The Supreme Court has opined that the existence of nexus between the tax evasion by the owner of the goods and the failure of C & F agent to furnish information required by the Commissioner is implicit in section 57(2) and the assessing authority concerned has to necessarily record a finding to this .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ity under the Income Tax Act that before invoking the provisions of section 40A(3) in the light of Rule 6DD as clarified by the Circular of the CBDT that whether the failure on the part of the assessee in adhering to requirement of provisions of section 40A(3) has any such nexus which defeats the object of provision so as to invite such a consequence. We hold that the purpose of section 40A(3) is only preventive and to check evasion of tax and flow of unaccounted money or to check transactions w .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

Discussion Forum
what is new what is new
 


Share:            

|| Home || About us || Feedback || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version