Subscription   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
CGST - Acts + GST Rates GST Ntf. GST Forms GST - Manual GST - FAQ State GST Acts SGST Ntf. I. Tax Manual
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE Versus SHANTI PROCESSORS LTD

2016 (331) E.L.T. 234 (Guj.) - Maintainability of appeal before HC - Applicability of Notification No.14/2002-CE dated 01.03.2002 - determination of the rate of duty - Held that:- A perusal of the impugned order of the Tribunal clearly shows that the dispute involved in the present case relates to the applicability of Notification No.14/2002-CE dated 01.03.2002 which has a direct bearing on the determination of the rate of duty for the purposes of assessment. Under the circumstances, in the ligh .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

learned Senior Standing Counsel for the appellant in each of the appeals and Mr Dhaval Shah, learned advocate for the respondent in Tax Appeal No.332 of 2015 and Mr Paresh Dave, learned advocate for the respondent in Tax Appeals No.331, 333 and 341 of 2015. 2 By these appeals under section 35G of the Central Excise Act, 1944 the appellant-revenue has challenged the order dated 28th October, 2014 passed by the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal by proposing the following questions .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ent condition is not fulfilled by the assessee? (B) Whether the conditions attached to Notification No.14/2002-CE dated 01.03.2002 provide that the benefit under the said notification can be available in relation to the products, which are subjected to actual payment of duty and not otherwise? (C) Whether in the facts and circumstances of the case, what is the scope of Explanation-II to Notification No.14/20002-CE dated 01.03.2002 and whether the legal fiction created thereunder includes textile .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

s on the distinguishing points of contentions raised by the Departmental Representative at the hearing by the Larger Bench of the Tribunal? 3 Mr Paresh Dave and Mr Dhaval Shah, learned advocates for the respondents at the outset submitted that the controversy involved in the present case relates to the determination of a question having a relation to the rate of duty of excise or to the value of goods for the purposes of assessment, under the circumstances, in view of the provisions of section 3 .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 



|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version