GST Helpdesk   Subscription   Demo   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
What's New Case Laws Highlights Articles News Forum Short Notes Statutory TMI SMS More ...
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

2015 (11) TMI 1236 - SUPREME COURT

2015 (11) TMI 1236 - SUPREME COURT - 2015 (325) E.L.T. 629 (SC) - Duty demand - non removal of goods after expiry of warehousing period - Held that:- Case is covered by the judgment of this Court in 'Kesoram Rayon v. Collector of Customs, Calcutta' [1996 (8) TMI 109 - SUPREME COURT OF INDIA]. - Commissioner directed to recalculate the interest. He may complete this exercise within one month from the date of receipt of the copy of this order and indicate the exact amount of interest which is paya .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

Fali Nariman, JJ For the Petitioner : Mr. S. K. Bagaria, Sr. Adv., Mr. Gaurav Juneja, Adv., Mr. Shikhar Srivastava, Adv., Mr. K. Ajit Singh, Adv. & M/s. Khaitan & Co. For the Respondent : Mr. K. Radhakrishnan, Sr. Adv., Mr. Shankar Divate, Adv., Mr. Arijit Prasad, Adv., Ms. Sunita Rani Singh, Adv. And Mr. B. Krishna Prasad, Adv. ORDER The appellant-assessee herein entered into a contract dated 10.04.1996 with one M/s. China Iron & Steel Industry and Trade Group Corporation, Beijing, .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ht extensions thereof as well. The extended period expired on 31.03.2002. During this period, the goods which were warehoused were removed substantially but still some goods remained to be cleared. As these goods were not cleared by the period permitted, the remaining goods were treated as unauthorised goods warehoused. It resulted in Show Cause Notice dated 30.03.2005 whereby a demand of duty of ₹ 3,07,65,945/- was raised in respect of uncleared goods which lay in the warehouse beyond the .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ereinafter referred to as 'CESTAT') which also dismissed the appeal vide orders dated 05.04.2007. Mr. S. K. Bagaria, learned senior counsel appearing for the appellant, fairly conceded that the case is covered by the judgment of this Court in 'Kesoram Rayon v. Collector of Customs, Calcutta' [1996 (5) SCC 576]. However, he endeavored to argue that the said judgment does not depict the law correctly and, therefore, made a fervent plea to refer the matter to larger Bench. After hea .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

Latest Notifications:

    Dated      Category

20-7-2017 Cus (NT)

18-7-2017 IT

18-7-2017 CE (NT)

18-7-2017 CE

18-7-2017 GST CESS Rate

15-7-2017 Kerala SGST

14-7-2017 Andhra Pradesh SGST

14-7-2017 Cus (NT)

14-7-2017 Cus

13-7-2017 Co. Law

13-7-2017 Co. Law

13-7-2017 ADD

13-7-2017 ADD

12-7-2017 Jammu & Kashmir SGST

12-7-2017 Gujarat SGST

12-7-2017 Gujarat SGST

12-7-2017 CGST Rate

12-7-2017 UTGST Rate

12-7-2017 UTGST Rate

12-7-2017 IGST Rate

More Notifications


Latest Circulars:

19-7-2017 Income Tax

18-7-2017 Customs

17-7-2017 Customs

14-7-2017 Income Tax

13-7-2017 Central Excise

13-7-2017 Customs

13-7-2017 Central Excise

13-7-2017 Customs

7-7-2017 Income Tax

7-7-2017 Goods and Services Tax

More Circulars



|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version