GST Helpdesk   Subscription   Demo   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
What's New Case Laws Highlights Articles News Forum Short Notes Statutory TMI SMS More ...
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

2015 (11) TMI 1396 - CESTAT MUMBAI

2015 (11) TMI 1396 - CESTAT MUMBAI - TMI - Denial of benefit of exemption Notification to the goods imported before the issue of public notice dated 18/5/2011 which were ex-bonded after the issue of public notice - removal of condition of "Actual user" - Held that:- The exemption is available subject to the condition that rate of duty shall apply such quantity of imports for which importer hold tariff rate quota allocation certificate issued by the custom facilitation committee in the DGFT in ac .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

) TMI 119 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY), it was held by the Hon ble Mumbai High Court that custom authorities cannot be sit in pin over the decision of licencing authority. In view of the matter we find nothing miss and held that the licence without actual user stipulation is authority for the - by the clearance of the subject goods. - no hesitation in rejected the appeal of the Revenue. - Decided against revenue. - APPEAL NO. C/873/12, C/85576/13 - Dated:- 29-7-2015 - Mr. P.S. Pruthi, M .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

emoving actual user condition cannot be applied retrospectively. The appellant imported maize corn and warehoused them in the custom bonded warehouse. Thereafter they filed ex-bond bill of entry dated 21/7/2011 for clearances of the warehouse goods under Section 68 of Customs Act under import licence No. 0550002311 dated 8/7/2011 for the clearance of the goods, which are in the extracted list of import items claiming the benefit of Sr. 21 of Notification No. 21/2002-CUS dated 1/3/2002 as amended .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ground that although the single member bench of Hon ble High Court of Andhra Pradesh order dated 23/1/2012 in Writ Petition No. 16349 of 2011 in the matter of Sriven Marketing held that the public notice dated 18/5/ 2011 is issued correctly, the division bench vide interim order dated 4/4/2012 in WAMP 447/2012 state operation of the single member bench. 2. Ld.A.R. appearing on behalf of the Revenue informed us that order of division bench of Hon ble Andra Pradesh High Court in writ petition No. .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

s were imported before the date of public notice fix without ex-bond clearances was done after date of public notice. He relied on the Apex Court judgment in the case of Darshan Oils Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Union of India[1995(75)ELT 32(S.C.)]. 3. On the other hand, Ld. Counsel for the respondent drew our attention to the Hon ble Andra Pradesh High Court order in the case of the same appellant in Sriven Marketing Vs. Union of India[2012(275) ELT 39 (A.P)] which upheld validity of public notice dated 18/5/ .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

i decision in the case of Autolight (India) Ltd. Vs. Union of India[2003(157) ELT 13(Bom.] and Hon bel Apex Court decision in the case of Titan Medical Systems Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Collector of Customs, New Delhi[2003(151) ELT 254(S.C.)]. Lastly he stated that even if the Hon ble Andhra Pradesh High Court has recalled its order in the case of Sriven Marketing the licence will still remain valid. 4. Heard both sides and carefully considered the submissions. 5. In this case adjudicating authority denied .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

facilitation committee in the DGFT in accordance with the procedure as may be specified.. We find that licence number under which the goods were ex-bonded No. 0550002311 issued to the respondent for release Tariff Rate Quota for the year 2011-12. Licence does not bear any actual user condition therefore Ld. Counsel for the respondent is right in contending that custom authority could not refuse exemption on the ground that license has not been issued correctly. It is for the DGFT to examine whe .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

Advanced Search


Latest Notifications:

    Dated      Category

20-7-2017 Cus (NT)

20-7-2017 GST CESS Rate

19-7-2017 IT

19-7-2017 IT

18-7-2017 IT

18-7-2017 CE (NT)

18-7-2017 CE

18-7-2017 GST CESS Rate

15-7-2017 Kerala SGST

14-7-2017 Andhra Pradesh SGST

14-7-2017 Cus (NT)

14-7-2017 Cus

13-7-2017 Co. Law

13-7-2017 Co. Law

13-7-2017 ADD

13-7-2017 ADD

12-7-2017 Jammu & Kashmir SGST

12-7-2017 Gujarat SGST

12-7-2017 Gujarat SGST

12-7-2017 CGST Rate

More Notifications


Latest Circulars:

21-7-2017 Goods and Services Tax

20-7-2017 Goods and Services Tax

20-7-2017 Goods and Services Tax

19-7-2017 Goods and Services Tax

19-7-2017 Income Tax

18-7-2017 Customs

17-7-2017 Customs

14-7-2017 Income Tax

13-7-2017 Central Excise

13-7-2017 Customs

More Circulars



|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version