Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding


  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

TMI Blog

Home

2015 (11) TMI 1430

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... nd worn out parts of the machinery would not increase the value of the machinery. At the time of debonding, the duty is payable on the value of the duty free raw materials and the depreciated value of the imported or indigenously procured capital goods and for this purpose, the value of the capital goods cannot be enhanced by the value of the spare parts used from time to time, even if the same have been capitalized. - at the time of debonding, the Jurisdictional Inspector, Central Excise, after checking their records and stock, had determined the appellants duty liability and had communicated the same under his letter dated 10/04/04 and at that time also he had checked the account of receipt and consumption of the imported as well as indi .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... rincipal approval for debonding. Thereafter the Jurisdictional Central Excise officer after checking their stock assessed the duty on the capital goods and inputs to be paid at the time of debonding and the total excise duty and custom duty so assessed was ₹ 1,08,83,399/-. This duty was paid and on 16/04/04. The Commissioner issued a no due certificate which was passed on to the Development Commissioner. On 20/04/04 the Development Commissioner issued a final debonding order and, as such, the appellants unit became a DTA unit. 1.2 The appellant during 1996-97 to 2001-02 period had used and capitalized certain spare parts. These spares imported free of duty were used to replace the damaged and worn out parts of the machinery. The D .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... h Jain, the learned Departmental Representative, defended the impugned order by reiterating the findings of the Commissioner and emphasized that when the appellant have capitalized the spare parts, in question, there is double enrichment, as they have availed depreciation on the value of the spare parts and at the same time, they have also enjoyed the Customs duty exemption, that once the spare parts, in question, were capitalized, their value has to be added to the value of the capital goods, that the appellant had suppressed the fact of capitalization of the spare parts, in question, during 1996-97 to 2001-02 period, which came to the notice of the Department only in course of audit of their record and, therefore, the longer limitation pe .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates