Subscription   Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Forum Articles Highlights TMI Notes SMS News What's New Calendar Imp. Links Database More...
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

Dy. Commissioner of Income-tax, Circle – 7 (1) , Hyderabad Versus M/s Kishoresons Surfactants

Rectification of mistake - deduction on the profit earned out of job work charges u/s 80IB not allowable - Held that:- On going through the facts on record, it is an admitted fact that the claim of assessee u/s 80IB was allowed by the revenue authorities from AY 1998-99, which was the first AY in which assessee made its claim u/s 80IB. The benefit, of deduction available for a specified number of years on satisfaction of the conditions laid down as per the respective provisions of the Act once c .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

e may be conceivably two opinions. A decision on a debatable point of law is not a mistake apparent from the record.” In view of the settled position of law, we do not find any infirmity in the orders of CIT(A) in the AYs under consideration and accordingly the same are hereby upheld dismissing the grounds raised by revenue in all the appeals under consideration. - Decided in favour of assessee. - ITA Nos. 883, 884 & 885/Hyd/2015 - Dated:- 9-10-2015 - SHRI P. MADHAVI DEVI, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SH .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

way of this common and consolidated order. 2. The grounds raised by revenue in these appeals are common, which are as under: 1. The ld. CIT(A) erred both in law and on facts 2. The ld. CIT(A) ought to have appreciated the fact that the AO after examining all the aspects has considered the proceedings u/s 154, as the mistake is within the purview of section 154. 3. As facts and grounds of appeal are identical, to dispose of these appeals, we refer to the facts from AY 2003-04 being ITA No. 883/H/ .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

rk Charges and the balance pertains to Sales. Against the total turnover of. Rs.l,55,93,071/-, the assessee's income under the head income from Business works out to Rs.l,28,74,708/-. Out of this income, the assessee had claimed a deduction of ₹ 32,18,677/- (i.e. 25% of Rs.l,28,74,708/-) u/s.80IB of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (Act). The above mentioned deduction was claimed on the profit earned out of job work charges also. AO was of the view that the said claim was not allowable as the .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ssee filed its reply. The assessee's submission was considered as not tenable. The AO, therefore, disallowed the claim u/s 80IB to the extent of ₹ 23,58,646 which is proportionate to job work income in the order passed u/s 154 dated 04/03/2014. 5. Aggrieved by the order of AO, assessee preferred appeal before ld. CIT(A). 6. In the course of the appellate proceedings, the AR submitted that the claim u/s 80IB was first made in the AY 1998-99 and the claim was accepted by the Assessing Of .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ought under the purview of sec. 154. The AR contended that the Assessing Officer was not justified to re-appreciate and reinterpret the provisions of law and that the nature of the disallowance did not fall within the concept of mistake apparent from the record as defined by the Hon ble Supreme Court in the case of ITO vs Volkart Brothers [1971] 82 ITR SO(Se) in the following words: "A mistake apparent on the record must be an obvious and patent mistake and not something which can be establ .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

law. The ld. CIT(A) held that the recourse to sec.154 for making the disallowance is, therefore, not justified and not in accordance with the provisions of this section. The ld. CIT(A) set aside the disallowance made by the Assessing Officer, allowing the appeal of assessee. In AY 2004-05 and 2005-06 also ld. CIT(A) allowed the appeals of assessee. 8. Aggrieved by the order of ld. CIT(A), revenue is in appeal before us. 9. Ld. DR relied upon the order of AO and submitted that ld. CIT(A) was wro .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

The f irst assessment year of the appellants claim U/s.80-IA was for the assessment year 1998-99. The claim was examined. A categorical finding in the assessment order was given as to how and why the appellant was eligible for the claim and the claim has been allowed. The under taking satisf ied the condit ions laid down under the respective provisions of the I.T. Act, 1961 as has been held while allowing the claim. iii) The claim that stood considered and allowed for the f irst assessment year .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

of by product, spent sulphur ic acid. The orders U/s.263 of I .T. Act of the Commissioner of Income Tax were contested before the ITAT. v) The ITAT cancelled the order of CIT, in terms of its order dated 23rd October 2009. The consequence being that the claim of deduct ion has been held to be valid. Again for the assessment year 2005-2006 while completing the assessment on 31/12/2007 the claim was denied. This is because the revision proceedings u/s.263 for the assessment year 2003- 2004 on the .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

has fallen under the purview of the provisions of section 153A of I.T. Act 1961. ii) I t is borne out of the assessment records that the assessment years 2003-2004; 2004-2005 and 2005-2006 are par t of the block assessments completed U/s.143(3) read with sect ion 153A of the I.T. Act , 1961. The subject mat ter at issue was once again examined by the assessing off icer in the assessment proceedings and the claim has been allowed. The back drop of the factual aspects as obtained in the assessment .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

e appellant's facts and they are distinguishable. A copy of the explanat ion is enclosed to be read as par t and parcel of this statement of facts. iv) The assessing of ficer with a simple and bald observation reading as "the assessee's submission is considered but not found tenable" passed the present rect if icat ion order U/s.154 treat ing the same as a mistake apparent from record modifying the assessed income with an addit ion of ₹ 23,58,646/-. 11. Referring to the a .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ars on satisfaction of the conditions laid down as per the respective provisions of the Act once considered and allowed cannot be withdrawn subsequently and that too by recourse to the proceedings U/s.154 of the I.T. Act, 1961 when there was no change either in facts and/or in law. iv) The settled judicial proposition of law enunciated by the Apex Court was categorical to the effect that "A mistake apparent on the record must be an obvious and patent mistake and not something which can be e .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

  ↓     Latest Happening     ↓  

Forum: 3B mistake

Forum: Excise duty credit on finished stock at additional place of business.

Forum: Input tax credit

TMI Note: Capital Gain - transfer of right in the land or transfer of land itself - addition u/s 50C - Harassment to the honest tax payers

Highlight: Option to avail composition scheme under GST by electronically filing an intimation in FORM GST CMP-02 and FORM GST ITC-03 upto 30-9-2017 - See Rule 3(3A)

Forum: GST on Notional rent

Forum: GST ON SALES PROMOTION

TMI Note: Does ICDS apply for the purposes of computing exemption u/s 11 to 13.

Highlight: Voluntary Reporting of Estimated Current Income and Advance Tax Liability - CBDT issues draft notification

TMI Note: Certain ICDS provisions are inconsistent with judicial precedents. Whether these judicial precedents would prevail over ICDS.

Highlight: Provisions of ICDS shall prevail w.e.f. AY 2017-18 to the transactional issues dealt therein over earlier judicial pronouncements.

Notification: Levy of anti dumping duty on New/unused pneumatic radial tyres with or without tubes and/or flap of rubber (including tubeless tyres) having normal rim dia code above 16 originating in, or exported from China PR

News: Voluntary Reporting of Estimated Current Income and Advance Tax Liability

TMI Note: In case of conflict between ICDS and other specific provisions of the Income-tax rules, 1962 governing taxation of income like rules 9A, 9B etc. of the Rules, which provisions shall prevail.

TMI Note: Does ICDS apply to computation of Minimum Alternate Tax (MAT) u/s 115JB of the Act or Alternate Minimum Tax (AMT) u/s 115JC of the Act.

TMI Note: Where a term has not been defined under ICDS, nor under the Act, but has different interpretations given to it by the courts in tax cases, and in ICAI Accounting Standards, which interpretation would prevail while interpreting ICDS.

TMI Note: Whether the provisions of ICDS apply to a non-resident who claims the benefit of a double taxation avoidance agreement (DTAA).

TMI Note: In case any of the ICDS provisions is contrary to a circular or press release issued by the CBDT, which would prevail over the other.

TMI Note: ICDS-I requires disclosure of significant accounting policies and other ICDS requires specific disclosures. Where is the taxpayer required to make such disclosures specified in ICDS.

Notification: Income Computation and Disclosure Standards (ICDS) - New ICDS to be effective from AY 2017-18

News: RBI Reference Rate for US $

Highlight: GST - Detention of goods under transport - discrepancy in documents - the statutory provisions provide a mechanism for adjudication following detention of goods including for the provisional release thereof pending adjudication - HC

Highlight: Reassessment - first few paragraphs of the assessment order dealt with objections and disposed of accordingly - Unfortunately, the manner in which the AO has decided the issue is wholly unsustainable in law - HC

Highlight: Business expenditure u/s 37 - liquidated damage - breach of contract terms - Expenditure was not incurred for any purpose which is an offence or which is prohibited by law - cannot be disallowed - HC

Highlight: Valuation - inclusion of reimbursement of expenses - managing participation of clients in certain mela, fairs, promotional activities etc. - They are liable to service tax on the gross amount received - They cannot restrict their tax liability to only agency commission

Highlight: TDS liability - ITAT confirmed the liability - We do not see how it is possible for us to uphold the order of the Tribunal and when it purports to decide two Appeals of the Revenue by single paragraph conclusion - HC

Highlight: Reopening of assessment - sufficiency of material available with the AO to form a belief that income chargeable to tax had escaped assessment - bogus purchases - seller refused to respond - notice would not be interfered with - HC

Highlight: Exemption u/s 11 - education activities - transport and hostel facilities surplus cannot be considered as business income of the assessee society

News: Draft Notification for insertion of new rule 39A in the Income-tax Rules, 1962 – comments and suggestions-reg.

Highlight: Genuineness of labour wages expenses, embroidery charges, fabrication expenses etc. - getting work done through small workmen who do not have any permanent place of residence - disallowance of ad hoc expenditure deleted.

Highlight: Project import - Since the goods were never used for the purpose for which it was imported, the actual user condition has been violated - Redemption fine and penalty imposed.

Highlight: Penalty u/s 112 (a) - CHA - Lack of due diligence and failure to take more precautions can not, by itself, bring in penal consequences

Highlight: Import of services - GST - The fact that those services were received outside India will not change the fact that the services have been paid for by the beneficiary appellant, who is located in India. - Demand confirmed.

Notification: SEZ for IT/ITES at Madhurwada Village, Visakhapatnam District in the State of Andhra Pradesh - denotified.

Highlight: Merely because payment is received in Indian rupee, it cannot be said that payment against export has not been received in convertible foreign exchange.

Highlight: Merely vehicle numbers was not mentioned on the invoices cannot be the reason to deny Cenvat Credit

Highlight: Extension of time limit for submitting the declaration in FORM GST TRAN-1 under rule 120A of the Central Goods and Service Tax Rules, 2017 - Circular

Circular: Extension of time limit for submitting the declaration in FORM GST TRAN-1 under rule 120A of the Central Goods and Service Tax Rules, 2017

News: Auction for Sale (Re-issue) of Government Stocks

Article: TDS APPLICABILITY ON GOVERNMENT CONTRACTS UNDER GST (Under Section 51 of the CGST Act, 2017)

News: Manmohan takes potshots at note ban, 'hasty' rollout of GST

News: GST on petrol, diesel requires wider discussion: Nitish

Article: WHEN CAN ONE TAKE ITC FOR RCM CASES?

Notification: TDS liability under Section 51 of CGST, 2017 come into force w.e.f. 18-9-2017 - Persons liable to deduct TDS from payment made or credited to the supplier of taxable goods or services specified

Notification: Central Goods and Services Tax (Seventh Amendment) Rules, 2017

Notification: Seeks to extend the last date for filing the return in FORM GSTR-3B for the months of August to December, 2017

Circular: Filing of Special Leave Petition against Orders of Hon'ble High Courts staying Collection of Tax under GST- reg.

Highlight: Exemption u/s 54F - LTCCG - once entire net consideration is invested, the absence of completion certificate cannot be a ground to deny the benefit of deduction.

Highlight: Deduction u/s 10B - initial AY - Mere authorization to enable the Assessee to import material or export produce in the earlier date would not ipso facto tantamount to commencement of substantial activity of ‘manufacture’/’production’.

Circular: Sub:- Procedure to be followed for Import under DEEC/EPCG Scheme- reg.



|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version