Subscription   Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Forum Articles Highlights TMI Notes SMS News What's New Calendar Imp. Links Database More...
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle-5, Jaipur Versus M/s Sambhav Gems Ltd

Trading addition - CIT(A) deleted the addition - Held that:- We have verified the facts, which are identical to A.y. 2008-09. The similar trading additions were made by the Assessing Officer by rejecting the books of account, not maintaining quantitative and qualitative details of stock and day to day stock register of raw material consumed. During the year, the assessee’s turnover has gone up whereas the G.P. rate has gone down compared to immediate preceding year but is more compared to A.Y. 2 .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

. Bhateja (Addl.CIT) For The Assessee : Shri G.G. Mundra (CA) ORDER PER T.R. MEENA, A.M. This is an appeal filed by the revenue against the order dated 02/09/2013 of the learned C.I.T.(A)-II, Jaipur for A.Y. 2010-11. The sole ground of appeal is reproduced as under:- (i) Deleting trading addition of ₹ 54,98,268/- made by A.O., without appreciating that neither quantitative and qualitative details of stock were maintained nor day to day stock register of raw material consumed was kept by as .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

he Assessing Officer. The ld Assessing Officer observed that the assessee had shown following business results from A.Y. 2007-08 to A.Y. 2010-11, which is as under:- A.Y. Sales Rs. G.P. Rs. G.P. Rate 2007-08 3218.71 lacs 379.00 lacs 11.77% 2008-09 2740.98 lacs 404.00 lacs 14.74% 2009-10 1845.30 LACS 355.28 lacs 20.62% 2010-11 2248.47 lacs 49.74 lacs 15.55% During the year under consideration, the assessee had shown total turnover of more than ₹ 22.48 crores upon which gross profit of more .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

eply vide letter dated 05/2/2013, which has been reproduced on page 2 and 3 of the assessment order by the Assessing Officer. After considering the assessee s reply, the ld Assessing Officer held that the assessee had not maintained day to day quantitative and qualitative details pertaining to various items purchases and sold, opening stock etc. In absence of these details, the veracity of the trading account cannot be verified in terms of quantitative as well as qualitative details, therefore, .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

stones. The assessee had not shown uniform or compatible production or re-cut loss which could justify the correctness and truthfulness of the books of account. Similarly the rejection of goods also not verifiable from the record, therefore, the Assessing Officer gave a notice as to why books of account should not be rejected U/s 145(3) of the Act and also proposed to apply 18% gross profit rate as applied in the A.Y. 2008-09. The assessee again replied vide letter dated 20/2/2013, which has be .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

jected the book result U/s 145(3) of the Act. He relied on the decisions of Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of CIT Vs. British Paints India Ltd. 188 ITR 44 (SC) and CST Vs. H.Esuf Ali, H.M. Abdul Ali 90 ITR 271 (SC). After discussing the legal position, the ld Assessing Officer held that gross profit rate @ 20% was applied in A.Y. 2002-03 and subsequent years mainly in the ground there were unverifiable purchases from certain bogus parties. However, during the current year no unverifiable .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

see. 3. Being aggrieved by the order of the Assessing Officer, the assessee carried the matter before the ld CIT(A), who had deleted the addition by observing that the ld Assessing Officer applied G.P. rate on the basis of assessment made in A.Y. 2008-09 as the ld predecessor vide order dated 12/12/2011 decided the appeal for A.Y. 2008-09, in which the trading addition made by the Assessing Officer was deleted. He has reproduced the finding of the ld CIT(A) for A.Y. 2008-09 on pages Nos. 11 to 1 .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

r wastage in the manufacturing. Similarly the percentage of wastage/rejection would also depend on the quality of raw material. He further relied on the decision in the case of Hon ble Punjab & Haryana High Court in the case of CIT Vs. Om Overseas 315 ITR 185 (P&H) on rejection of books of account, not pointed out any specific defect. The ld Assessing Officer had rejected the books of account only on the ground that the assessee had not been able to get records of raw material consumed i .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

y business. The gross profit rate declared during the year is more than all the years except A.Y. 2009-10. The ld Assessing Officer issued the show cause notice for rejection of book result as well as application of G.P. rate on the basis of finding given for A.Y. 2008-09, which has been deleted by the ld CIT(A) and confirmed by the Hon ble ITAT. Therefore, he allowed the appeal. 4. Now the revenue is in appeal before us. The ld DR has vehemently supported the order of the Assessing Officer. At .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

and circumstances of the assessee s case are identical. In the year under consideration, the turnover of the assessee was more than ₹ 22.48 crores and gross profit declared more than ₹ 3,49 crores with G.P. rate @ 15.55% in comparison to A.Y. 2009-10 where gross turnover was more than ₹ 18.45 crores with G.P. more than ₹ 3.55 crores with G.P. @ 19.25%. The GP was lesser by about 5.54 crores only in A.Y. 2009-10, which is evident from statistics submitted by the assessee .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

al gross profit has to scale down export sale prices which resulted in lower rate of gross profit but more total gross profit. Further submitted to the ld Assessing Officer that in A.Y. 2010-11 exchange rate of US dollar in which exports are made were continuously falling down and it resulted in lesser realization of export value by over ₹ 61 lacs which effected G.P. rate by about 2.74% (Statement submitted in support of contention) and further cost of raw material increased due to continu .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

urnover of assessee company for A.Y. 2009-10 was lowest. The history of declared results for all past years will show that in this A.Y. 2010-11, G.P. rate is higher from all past years except in A.Y. 2009-10. The turnover of A.Y.(s) 2002-03, 2004-05 and 2005-06 are similar to this year and marginally lower from A.Y.(s) 2003-04, 2006-07 and 2007-08 wherein declared gross profit rate was much lower but those were also accepted in assessment. Thus looking to these facts the declared gross profit ra .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

  ↓     Latest Happening     ↓  

Forum: 3B mistake

Forum: Excise duty credit on finished stock at additional place of business.

Forum: Input tax credit

TMI Note: Capital Gain - transfer of right in the land or transfer of land itself - addition u/s 50C - Harassment to the honest tax payers

Highlight: Option to avail composition scheme under GST by electronically filing an intimation in FORM GST CMP-02 and FORM GST ITC-03 upto 30-9-2017 - See Rule 3(3A)

Forum: GST on Notional rent

Forum: GST ON SALES PROMOTION

TMI Note: Does ICDS apply for the purposes of computing exemption u/s 11 to 13.

Highlight: Voluntary Reporting of Estimated Current Income and Advance Tax Liability - CBDT issues draft notification

TMI Note: Certain ICDS provisions are inconsistent with judicial precedents. Whether these judicial precedents would prevail over ICDS.

Highlight: Provisions of ICDS shall prevail w.e.f. AY 2017-18 to the transactional issues dealt therein over earlier judicial pronouncements.

Notification: Levy of anti dumping duty on New/unused pneumatic radial tyres with or without tubes and/or flap of rubber (including tubeless tyres) having normal rim dia code above 16 originating in, or exported from China PR

News: Voluntary Reporting of Estimated Current Income and Advance Tax Liability

TMI Note: In case of conflict between ICDS and other specific provisions of the Income-tax rules, 1962 governing taxation of income like rules 9A, 9B etc. of the Rules, which provisions shall prevail.

TMI Note: Does ICDS apply to computation of Minimum Alternate Tax (MAT) u/s 115JB of the Act or Alternate Minimum Tax (AMT) u/s 115JC of the Act.

TMI Note: Where a term has not been defined under ICDS, nor under the Act, but has different interpretations given to it by the courts in tax cases, and in ICAI Accounting Standards, which interpretation would prevail while interpreting ICDS.

TMI Note: Whether the provisions of ICDS apply to a non-resident who claims the benefit of a double taxation avoidance agreement (DTAA).

TMI Note: In case any of the ICDS provisions is contrary to a circular or press release issued by the CBDT, which would prevail over the other.

TMI Note: ICDS-I requires disclosure of significant accounting policies and other ICDS requires specific disclosures. Where is the taxpayer required to make such disclosures specified in ICDS.

Notification: Income Computation and Disclosure Standards (ICDS) - New ICDS to be effective from AY 2017-18

News: RBI Reference Rate for US $

Highlight: GST - Detention of goods under transport - discrepancy in documents - the statutory provisions provide a mechanism for adjudication following detention of goods including for the provisional release thereof pending adjudication - HC

Highlight: Reassessment - first few paragraphs of the assessment order dealt with objections and disposed of accordingly - Unfortunately, the manner in which the AO has decided the issue is wholly unsustainable in law - HC

Highlight: Business expenditure u/s 37 - liquidated damage - breach of contract terms - Expenditure was not incurred for any purpose which is an offence or which is prohibited by law - cannot be disallowed - HC

Highlight: Valuation - inclusion of reimbursement of expenses - managing participation of clients in certain mela, fairs, promotional activities etc. - They are liable to service tax on the gross amount received - They cannot restrict their tax liability to only agency commission

Highlight: TDS liability - ITAT confirmed the liability - We do not see how it is possible for us to uphold the order of the Tribunal and when it purports to decide two Appeals of the Revenue by single paragraph conclusion - HC

Highlight: Reopening of assessment - sufficiency of material available with the AO to form a belief that income chargeable to tax had escaped assessment - bogus purchases - seller refused to respond - notice would not be interfered with - HC

Highlight: Exemption u/s 11 - education activities - transport and hostel facilities surplus cannot be considered as business income of the assessee society

News: Draft Notification for insertion of new rule 39A in the Income-tax Rules, 1962 – comments and suggestions-reg.

Highlight: Genuineness of labour wages expenses, embroidery charges, fabrication expenses etc. - getting work done through small workmen who do not have any permanent place of residence - disallowance of ad hoc expenditure deleted.

Highlight: Project import - Since the goods were never used for the purpose for which it was imported, the actual user condition has been violated - Redemption fine and penalty imposed.

Highlight: Penalty u/s 112 (a) - CHA - Lack of due diligence and failure to take more precautions can not, by itself, bring in penal consequences

Highlight: Import of services - GST - The fact that those services were received outside India will not change the fact that the services have been paid for by the beneficiary appellant, who is located in India. - Demand confirmed.

Notification: SEZ for IT/ITES at Madhurwada Village, Visakhapatnam District in the State of Andhra Pradesh - denotified.

Highlight: Merely because payment is received in Indian rupee, it cannot be said that payment against export has not been received in convertible foreign exchange.

Highlight: Merely vehicle numbers was not mentioned on the invoices cannot be the reason to deny Cenvat Credit

Highlight: Extension of time limit for submitting the declaration in FORM GST TRAN-1 under rule 120A of the Central Goods and Service Tax Rules, 2017 - Circular

Circular: Extension of time limit for submitting the declaration in FORM GST TRAN-1 under rule 120A of the Central Goods and Service Tax Rules, 2017

News: Auction for Sale (Re-issue) of Government Stocks

Article: TDS APPLICABILITY ON GOVERNMENT CONTRACTS UNDER GST (Under Section 51 of the CGST Act, 2017)

News: Manmohan takes potshots at note ban, 'hasty' rollout of GST

News: GST on petrol, diesel requires wider discussion: Nitish

Article: WHEN CAN ONE TAKE ITC FOR RCM CASES?

Notification: TDS liability under Section 51 of CGST, 2017 come into force w.e.f. 18-9-2017 - Persons liable to deduct TDS from payment made or credited to the supplier of taxable goods or services specified

Notification: Central Goods and Services Tax (Seventh Amendment) Rules, 2017

Notification: Seeks to extend the last date for filing the return in FORM GSTR-3B for the months of August to December, 2017

Circular: Filing of Special Leave Petition against Orders of Hon'ble High Courts staying Collection of Tax under GST- reg.

Highlight: Exemption u/s 54F - LTCCG - once entire net consideration is invested, the absence of completion certificate cannot be a ground to deny the benefit of deduction.

Highlight: Deduction u/s 10B - initial AY - Mere authorization to enable the Assessee to import material or export produce in the earlier date would not ipso facto tantamount to commencement of substantial activity of ‘manufacture’/’production’.

Circular: Sub:- Procedure to be followed for Import under DEEC/EPCG Scheme- reg.



|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version