TMI Blog2015 (12) TMI 216X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... , for the Respondent. ORDER Appellant claimed refund of Rs. 2,95,820/- for the period from January 2006 to March 2006 under Rule 5 of CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004 on the ground that they could not utilize the CENVAT credit for the purpose of adjustment towards payment of Service Tax/duty. Refund claim has been rejected on various grounds and the grounds and conclusions are discussed below :- 2.&em ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ces (6) Management maintenance or repair services (7) Manpower recruitment and supply agency services (8) Rent-a-cab service (9) Technical testing and analysis services (10) Telecommunication services After examining each service and the usage thereof and considered in the light of precedent ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|