Contact us   Feedback   Subscription   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

2015 (12) TMI 348 - ITAT MUMBAI

2015 (12) TMI 348 - ITAT MUMBAI - TMI - Disallowance on account of non-payment of service tax liability u/s 43B - CIT(A) deleted the addition - Held that:- CIT(A) has given a categorical finding of fact that the assessee had not claimed the amount of Service Tax Liability in the profit and loss account and hence there was no question of making disallowance and Secondly, the assessee had collected the Service Tax and paid later, on the dates as incorporated above. Thus, no disallowance u/s 43B ca .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ted, reported in [2009 (11) TMI 27 - SUPREME COURT ]. Thus, the order of the CIT(A) on this score also is upheld. - Decided in favour of assessee - ITA No. : 7606/Mum/2013, Cross Objection No. 113/Mum/2015 - Dated:- 4-9-2015 - SHRI AMIT SHUKLA, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI RAJESH KUMAR, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER For The Appellant Cross Objector : Shri Surendra Damle For The Respondent : Shri B.D Naik PER AMIT SHUKLA, JM: The aforesaid appeal has been filed by the revenue and Cross Objection by the assessee .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

e Ld. CIT(A) erred in not appreciating the fact that the assessee made the payment of the Service Tax liability amounting to ₹ 1,02,21,606/- after filing of Return of Income for the current year. 1.2 On the facts and in the circumstances of the case as well as in law, the Ld. CIT(A) erred in not appreciating the fact that the balance Service Tax payment made on amount of late payment of Employees Contribution of PF amounting to ₹ 29,69,876/-. 2. On the facts and in the circumstances .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ompany . 2. During the course of the assessment proceedings, the Assessing Officer on the perusal of the Balance Sheet noticed that there is a mention in Schedule H , regarding unpaid service tax liability and Employees contribution to provident fund for sums amounting to ₹ 1,29,79,838/- and ₹ 29,69,876/- respectively. The Assessing Officer held that such a payment should be disallowed u/s 43B as there has been delayed payment on account of both, Employee s contribution to PF and del .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

amount u/s 43B. Further, he held that assessee had to pay the service tax after collecting the service tax from the payers as per the Service Tax Rules, which the assessee had done as per the details mentioned at page 4 of the appellate order. The relevant observation and finding of the CIT(A) in this regard are as under :- I have considered the facts and circumstances of the case. During the year under consideration AO had added ₹ 1,29,79,838/- for non-payment of service tax liability as .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

opinion since the assessee did not debit the amount to the profit and loss account as on expenditure nor did the assessee claim any deduction in respect of the amount and considering that the assessee is following the mercantile system of accounting, the question of disallowing the deduction not claimed would not arise . In the case of ACIT vs Real Image Media Technologies (P) Ltd (2008) 116 TTJ 964 (Chennai) wherein it is held as under: (2009) 21 ITD 461 (Chennai) (TM) Section 43B can only be .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

deduction in P&L account. In the instant cases appellant had not claimed any deduction, hence, AO cannot disallow the amount. Moreover till July 2011, the appellant had to pay service tax only after collecting the service tax from the payers as per the service tax rules. The appellant had collected the service tax later and paid the same as under: Date BEFORE FILING OF ITR Amount 06.05.2010 1,043,679.00 06.05.2010 62,972.00 06.05.2010 677,202.00 30.06.2010 974,379.00 TOTAL 2,758,232.00 Date .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 



|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version