Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding


  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

TMI Blog

Home

2002 (3) TMI 915

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... agreement entered between the company and the Bihar State Electricity Board on 5.12.89. The company failed to pay the electric dues and, in the circumstances. Certificate case (Electric) No. 34/95 -96 was initiated by the Certificate Officer, Siwan, on the requisition of the Electricity Board. In the column of the Certificate - debtors the name of the appellant was also mentioned besides that of the company i.e. M/s Satyam Roller Flour Mill Pvt. Ltd. The appellant prayed for deletion of his name on the ground that the liability in question being corporate liability, his inclusion in the certificate proceeding was unwarranted and illegal. The plea found favour with the Certificate Officer who by his order dated 20.12.95 after hearing the Boa .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... r of the proceeding, counsel placed reliance on Damodar Prasad Nathani anr. V/s. The State of Bihar ors., 1999 (1) PLJR 522, Smt. Sarla Devi Agrawala V/s. The State of Bihar ors., 1879 BBCJ 213, Bejai Singh Dugar V/s. Certificate Officer, Bhagalpur, 1965. BLJR 341, M.P. Agarwalla and anr. V/s. Union of India and ors., 1963 BLJR 127 and Harihar Prasad V/s. Bansi Missir ors., AIR 1931 Patna 321. He also referred to decisions in (2001) 9 SCC 275, M/s Filterco and anr. V/s. Commissioner of Sales Tax, M.P. and anr. (1986) 2 SCC 103. Collector of Customs Excise, Cochin ors. V/s. M/s A.S. Bava, AIR 1968 Supreme Court 13, and Dr. (Smt.) Kuntesh Gupta V/s. Management of Hindu Kanya Mahavidyalay, Sitapur (U.P.) Ors., (1987) 4 SCC 525 in .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... nst its officers including Director or Managing Director. Amongst the decision cited by the counsel pointed reference may be made to two of them rendered in the context of the proceedings under the Public Demands Recovery Act, namely, those of Bejai Singh Dugar V/s. Certificate Officer, Bhagalpur (supra) and Damodar Prasad Nathani V/s. State of Bihar (supra). In the former case a Division Bench of this Court after a detailed consideration of the matter observed that execution of certificate against the Managing Director of any company or for that matter any authority of the company for the dues of the company cannot be resorted to. Any debt payable by an incorporated company can be realised only by seizing the assets of the company and not .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ned is to complete the description of the certificate -debtor. He referred to the contents of the application filed by the Board on 27.9.90 pursuant to which eventually the Collector passed the impugned order. Paragraphs 4 and 5 of the said application are as follows: '' That Kanhaiya Lal is in his individual capacity has been removed from the record of the case but mill is to be sued through him, it is appropriate that his name should be recorded in the record. That it is appropriate that the certificate proceeding be shown, in the name of Satyam Roller Flour Mill Makdum Sarai, Siwan through Kanhaiya Lal Managing Director of the Mill. 6. Though, as fairly stated by the counsel for the Board, the Board merely wanted the name .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... in a writ petition so as to amount to denudation of the power of the High Court under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution which power the High Court can always exercise in the facts and circumstances of the case, notwithstanding that some alternative remedy is available to the person aggrieved which he has not exhausted. In the case of Sawar Mal Choudhary V/s. State Bank of India (supra) is concerned, the provision regarding deposit of 40% of the certificate dues as a condition precedent for preferring an appeal or revision under section 60 or section 62 of the Act, as the case may be, was not considered to be onerous so as to provide a ground to the certificate - debtor to prefer writ petition by passing appellate or revisional forum. Thu .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates