Contact us   Feedback   Annual Subscription   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

2015 (12) TMI 584 - CESTAT NEW DELHI

2015 (12) TMI 584 - CESTAT NEW DELHI - TMI - Revoking the CHA licence of the appellant - Duty drawback claim - Overvaluation of goods - Held that:- Appellant had not taken authorization from the exporter who was found to be non-existent and the goods were found misdeclared and highly overvalued. - The appellant did not obtain any authorization from the exporter. It never met the exporter nor was in touch with the exporter even telephonically. Thus the question of advising his client to comply wi .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

of the CHALR, 2004. Several other judgments cited are in regard to reasonability of the punishment stating that the punishment should be commensurate with the offence. This ratio is unexceptionable. It is pertinent to mention that reasonability of the punishment and whether the punishment is commensurate with the gravity of offence is a mixed question of facts and law and needs to be determined in the light of factual matrix of each case.

Offense is really grave inasmuch as no author .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

Shipping Bills in the name of a non-existent exporter without making even preliminary enquiries about the genuineness of exporter in the name of which the documents were filed. Such dereliction of duty on the part of a CHA, can potentially have even graver financial/security consequences. Thus the appellant totally failed to discharge its duties as CHA thereby grossly violated Rule 13 of CHALR, 2004. Such serious violation on the part of the CHA can hardly deserve any condonation or leniency. - .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

t For the Respondent : Smt Suchitra Sharma, AR ORDER Per R. K. Singh This appeal has been filed against the order dated 10.4.2015 in terms of which CHA licence No.R-41/97 of the appellant was revoked. 2. The facts of the case are as under: The appellant filed three shipping bills of ready-made garments namely Rayon Scarves on behalf of M/s Reliable Overseas (Exporter) under claim of drawback. The impugned goods were found to be overvalued for claiming undue export benefits. Noticing that the app .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ing Regulations 2013 (CBLR, 2013)) revoking the CHA licence of the appellant. 3. The appellant has contended that (i) the time-limit prescribed for suspension of licence was not followed and cited the judgments of Madras High Court in the case of A.M. Ahmed &. Co. vs. C.C. (Imports), Chennai - 2014 (309) ELT 433 (Mad.); (ii) time-limit prescribed under Regulations 22(1) of CHALR 2004 was also not adhered to; (iii) while it is the fact that it had not obtained authorization from the exporter .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

and not directly from the exporter. The appellant was not aware about the exporter but the export documents were received from freight forwarder in good faith. It cited the judgment in the case of M.J. Joshi vs. C.C., Chennai - 2010 (258) ELT 460. It also cited the judgment of the Tribunal in the case of Sanco Trans Limited vs. C.C., Bangalore -1996 (83) ELT 557 (Tribunal) and few others to advance the proposition that for lack of exercise of proper inspection, supervision and diligence, a mere .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

Customs House Agent shall - (a) obtain an authorization from each of the companies, firms or individuals by whom he is for the time being employed as Customs House Agent and produce such authorization whenever required by the Deputy Commissioner of Customs or Assistant Commissioner of Customs; (b) transact business in the Customs Station either personally or through an employee duly approved by the Deputy Commissioner of Customs or Assistant Commissioner of Customs; (c) not represent a client be .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ts to a client with reference to any work related to clearance of cargo or baggage; (f) not withhold information contained in any order, instruction or public notice relating to clearance of cargo or baggage issued by the Commissioner of Customs, from a client who is entitled to such information; (g) promptly pay over to the Government, when due, sums received for payment of any duty, tax or other debit or obligations owing to the Government and promptly account to his client for funds received .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ubordinates by the use of threat, false accusation, duress or the offer of any special inducement or promise of advantage or by the bestowing of any gifts or favour or other thing of value; (j) not refuse access to, conceal, remove or destroy the whole or any part of any book, paper or other record, relating to his transactions as a Customs House Agent which is sought or may be sought by the Commissioner of Customs; (k) maintain records and accounts in such form and manner as may be directed fro .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

uments; (m) in the event of the licence granted to him being lost, immediately report the fact to the Commissioner of Customs; (n) ensure that he discharges his duties as Customs House Agent with utmost speed and efficiency and without avoidable delay; (o) verify antecedent, correctness of Importer Exporter Code (IEC) Number, identify of his client and functioning of his client at the declared address by using reliable, independent, authentic documents data or information. The appellant did not .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

regard the blatant and serious violation of the CHALR, 2004 as mentioned above it cannot be said that the penalty of revocation imposed by the Commissioner is arbitrary or unreasonable. The case-law of A.M. Ahamed & Co. v. C.C. (Imports), Chennai - 2014 (309) ELT 433 (Mad.) dealt with the suspension of the licence and not revocation of the licence and hence it is not applicable to the present case. We find that in this case the enquiry report was submitted on 16.1.2015 and the impugned orde .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

eds to be determined in the light of factual matrix of each case. The judgment of Falcon Air Cargo and Travel (P) Ltd. v. UOI - 2002 (140) ELT 8 (Del) cited by the appellant was regarding non-renewal of the licence and therefore is not applicable to the present case. In the present case the offence is really grave inasmuch as no authorization was obtained from the exporter, the exporter was found to be non-existent and no due diligence whatsoever was undertaken. In these circumstances mere filin .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ts were filed. Such dereliction of duty on the part of a CHA, can potentially have even graver financial/security consequences. Thus the appellant totally failed to discharge its duties as CHA thereby grossly violated Rule 13 of CHALR, 2004. Such serious violation on the part of the CHA can hardly deserve any condonation or leniency. In the case of Worldwide Cargo Movers (supra) [2006-TIOL-424-HC-MUM-CUS], the Bombay High Court apart from upholding the principle of liability of the CHA for the a .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

e are concerned with revocation which has been resorted to after a due enquiry. We are conscious that the punishment has to be commensurate with the misconduct and that by revocation the respondent and its employees are going to suffer. At the same time, we cannot forget that though it is the right of a citizen to carry on his business or profession, it is subject to reasonable restrictions and conditions. In the present case, those conditions were already stipulated. In the case of Arvind Bhaga .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

azenly defended his Regulation 8 employee who gave a fake name of his brother as an importer for undervaluing the imported car. Thus, the employee of the CHA was party to the Firm. The CHA has not disowned him and has, in fact, defended him in the reply filed by him before the appellant. That being so, he is clearly responsible vicariously, (emphasis added). 28. In our view, the Tribunal has committed a grave error in interfering with the decision of a domestic authority. In a departmental proce .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

he discipline to be maintained over there. If he takes a decision necessary for that purpose, the Tribunal is not expected to interfere on the basis of its own notions of the difficulties likely to be faced by the CHA or his employees. The decision is best to be left to the disciplinary authority save in exceptional cases where it is shockingly disproportionate or mala fide. That is not the case here, (emphasis added). 29. In the circumstances, we allow Customs Appeal No. 37 of 2006 filed by the .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 



|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version