2010 (2) TMI 1155

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ITA No.2131/Del/2007 pertaining to the assessment year 2004-05. The question before the Tribunal was whether the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) in his order dated 26.02.2007 had erred in confirming the addition of ₹ 30 lakhs made by the Assessing Officer treating the said amount as deemed dividend under Section 2(22)(e) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. After hearing the counsel for the ap .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... e assessee. The Tribunal noted that no material had been brought on record to suggest that what was explained by the assessee was incorrect. The Tribunal also noted the fact that the said amount of ₹ 30 lakhs had been given to the assessee on 27.06.2003 and as the deal did not materialize, the same was returned by the assessee shortly thereafter, i.e., on 04.07.2003. In view of the clear fin .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X