Subscription   Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Articles Highlights TMI Notes SMS News Newsletters Calendar Imp. Links Database Experts Contact us More....
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

BPL Techno Vision Pvt. Ltd. Versus Commissioner of Central Excise, Bangalore-I

Reversal of SAD credit on removal of inputs as such - Whether in such a scenario, the law requires separate reversal of SAD or not - Held that:- Provision of law simplicitor requires an assessee to reverse the CENVAT credit so availed by him in case the receipted inputs are subsequently removed. In the present case admittedly the appellant has paid excise duty by adopting transaction value of the said inputs by debiting the CENVAT credit. The said fact is not in dispute and stands mentioned in t .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ies is to the extent of ₹ 100 and if an asseessee has paid ₹ 120/- at the time of clearance of such inputs, it can be safely concluded that the entire credit stands reversed by him. There cannot be any further requirement of reversal of SAD component separately. - Impugned order is set aside - Decided in favour of assessee. - E/21155/2014-SM - Final Order No. 22113/2015 - Dated:- 28-10-2015 - Smt. Archana Wadhwa, Judicial Member For the Petitioner : Shri B. Raghavendra, Advocate For .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

cess as also on payment of SAD. The duties so paid by the appellant were availed as credit. 2. Though appellants are using the said inputs in the manufacture of their final product but in case of surplus inputs, the same are removed as such by selling the same. At the time of removal of the said inputs, the appellant paid the duty of excise on the transaction value of the said inputs, by debiting the same out of the CENVAT credit so availed. 3. As per the audit conducted in the appellants fa .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ellant contested the demand on merits as also on limitation. It was specifically pleaded by them that while paying duty of excise on the inputs sold by them, they have reversed much more than the total credit so availed by them. As such, there was no need to separately reverse the SAD credit. As regards limitation, they pleaded that the entire facts were in the knowledge of the Revenue and were part of their records, in which case, no mala fide can be attributed to them so as to justifiably invo .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

have considered the submissions made by both the sides. It is not disputed that the inputs were imported by the appellant on payment of duties for further use in the manufacture of their final product. The duties so paid by the appellant were availed as credit in their statutory records. However in some cases, the inputs being surplus were sold by the appellant on a transaction value and on payment of duty of excise. Such excise duty so paid by the appellant was debited from their CENVAT credit .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

manufacturer of the final product shall pay an amount equal to the credit availed in respect of such inputs. As such, the said provision of law simplicitor requires an assessee to reverse the CENVAT credit so availed by him in case the receipted inputs are subsequently removed. In the present case admittedly the appellant has paid excise duty by adopting transaction value of the said inputs by debiting the CENVAT credit. The said fact is not in dispute and stands mentioned in the impugned order .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ey need not to reverse the SAD component as they have already paid an amount more than what they have availed as CENVAT Credit, therefore no requirement in the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004 to reverse the credit availed on SAD. 20. These contentions of the assessee cannot be accepted. Mere paying more amounts by adopting the transaction value does not suffice the compliance to the provision of law. As per Rule 3(5) of CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004 the assessee has to reverse the amount equivalent to CEN .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

what is new what is new
  ↓     bird's eye view     ↓  


|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version