New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

2015 (12) TMI 909 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT

2015 (12) TMI 909 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT - TMI - Brought forward unabsorbed loss/ depreciation of the assessee's 10B unit - set off against the current year's profit of the same 10B unit allowed or not ? - Held that:- The issue as raised stands concluded by the decision of this Court in Black & Veatch Consulting(P) Ltd.(2012 (4) TMI 450 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT ) and "Ganesh Polychem Ltd. Vs. ITO" [2012 (8) TMI 953 - ITAT MUMBAI ] against the Revenue. Tribunal was right in holding that the brought forwa .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

s Appeal under Section 260-A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the Act), challenges the order dated 1 March 2013 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (the Tribunal) for the Assessment year 2009-10. 2. Although numerous questions of law have been formulated in the Memo of Appeal, Mr.Suresh Kumar, learned Counsel for the Revenue urges only the following reframed question of law for our consideration as under:- "(i) Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law, the Tr .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

n decision in the case of "Ganesh Polychem Ltd. Vs. ITO" decided in ITA No.8515/Mum/2010 on 10 August 2012 for the Assessment Year 2006-07 following the decision of this Court in Black & Veatch Consulting(P) Ltd.(supra). 3. The Revenue had carried the decision of the Tribunal in "Ganesh Polychem Ltd. Vs. ITO" (supra) to this Court being Income Tax Appeal (Lodg) No.2083 of 2012 raising the following question of law: "Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of th .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

f this Court in Black & Veatch Consulting(P) Ltd.(supra). 4. Mr.Suresh Kumar, learned Counsel for the Revenue does not dispute that the question as framed is covered by the decision of this Court in Black & Veatch Consulting(P) Ltd.(supra) & "Ganesh Polychem Ltd. Vs. ITO" (supra). However, he submits that the question as framed would require consideration as the contrary view taken by Karnataka High Court in "CIT Vs. Himatasingike Seide Ltd., ((2006)156 Taxman 151 (Kar .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 



|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version