GST Helpdesk   Subscription   Demo   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

2015 (12) TMI 926 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD

2015 (12) TMI 926 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD - TMI - Denial of refund claim - unjust enrichment - Held that:- Sub-section (2) of Section 18 of the Customs Act, 1962 provides when the duty leviable on such goods is assessed finally in accordance with the provisions of this Act, then, in case of goods, cleared for home consumption, the amount paid shall be adjusted against the duty finally assessed and if the amount is paid, the importer or the exporter be entitled to a refund claim as the case may be. It .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

terfere the order of the Commissioner (Appeals). However, as the matter is for the year 1988, we direct the Adjudicating Authority to complete the denove proceedings within 3 months from the date of receipt of this order - Appeal disposed of. - Appeal No. : C/78/2007 - Order No. A/11215 / 2015 - Dated:- 19-8-2015 - Mr. P.K. DAS, MEMBER (JUDICIAL) AND Mr. P.M, SALEEM, MEMBER (TECHNICAL) For the Petitioner : Shri Anand Nainawati, Advocate For the Respondent : shri J. Nair, Authorised Representativ .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

efund claims. The Tribunal by Final Order No. I/2955/WZB/2000 Dated 13.08.2000 allowed the appeal of the appellant held that the refund claims are not hit by principle unjust enrichment. The refunds were sanctioned by Order Dated 13.11.2003 and Order Dated 11.03.2004. The Adjudicating Authority rejected the payment of the interest on delayed refund of the amount. It is observed that on 26.09.2003 is the date of filing of refund claim, as the appellants refurnished the documents, instead of 01.08 .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

main contention of the Learned Advocate in respect of rejection the claim of interest against order-in-original dated 02.06.2004 and 06.08.2004, is that the Tribunal passed the order on 24.02.1997 holding that the loading is not required and in September 1998, the Department communicated that they have accepted the order of the Tribunal and therefore, the said date would be treated as the finalization of the provisional assessment as per provisions of Section 18 of the Customs Act, 1962 as it s .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 



|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version