New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

2015 (12) TMI 1048 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD

2015 (12) TMI 1048 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD - TMI - Denial of CENVAT Credit - Goods damaged due to flood - Imposition of penalty - Held that:- During de-novo Adjudication, the Appellants stated before the Adjudicating authority that they do not have any new or other documents except the documents submitted at the time of earlier Adjudication. Thus, the Appellants had not produced any documents in terms of Tribunal s order before the Adjudicating authority in denovo Adjudication - Appellants had not in .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ore, no penalty should be imposed upon him. - Decided partly in favour of assessee. - Appeal No.E/432-434/2011-SM - Order No.A/11791-11793/2015 - Dated:- 23-11-2015 - Mr. P.K. Das, Member (Judicial) For the Petitioner : Shri R. Subramanya, Advocate For the Respondent : Shri S.K. Shukla, A.R. ORDER Per: P.K. Das The relevant facts of the case, in brief, are that M/s Ganpati Alloys, the Appellant-firm was engaged in the manufacture of M.S. Ingots, classifiable under Chapter 72 of the Schedule to t .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

, it was found that the original copy of CENVAT invoices of ₹ 71,63,191.00 were not available. A Show Cause Notice dt.05.11.2007 was issued, proposing to deny CENVAT Credit of ₹ 71,63,191.00 alongwith interest and to impose penalty for the month of January 2003 to June 2005. The Adjudicating authority confirmed the demand of CENVAT Credit of ₹ 43,72,859.00 alongwith interest and imposed penalties. The Tribunal by Final Order No.A/393-395/WZB/AHD/2010, dt.03.05.2010 remanded the .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

the Appellants contested the demand on merit and on limitation. He submits that there is no dispute that at the time of availing CENVAT Credit, the Appellant possessed the original copy of the invoices, which were lost during the flood and therefore, the CENVAT Credit should be allowed on the basis of photo-copy of the invoices. He further submits that the photo-copy of the invoices has to be accepted for the purpose of verification. It is further submitted that the CENVAT Credit was taken duri .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

case of suppression of facts with intent to evade payment of duty and therefore, extended period of limitation would be invoked. He drew the attention of the Bench to the relevant portion of the Adjudication order. He also submits that the Tribunals remand order is only for verification of records. 4. After hearing both the sides and on perusal of the records, I find that that this is second round of litigation. For proper appreciation of the case, the relevant portion of the Tribunals order .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

arned advocate also explained that there are around 6 invoices issued after the flood incidence, in respect of which the MODVAT Credit also stand denied. We leave the said issue for Commissioner to decide afresh in de-novo proceedings. 5. On perusal of the impugned order, I find that during de-novo Adjudication, the Appellants stated before the Adjudicating authority that they do not have any new or other documents except the documents submitted at the time of earlier Adjudication. Thus, the App .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

riod 02.02.2004 to 03.08.2004 relating to Excise, Accounts and other miscellaneous were not available and few records which were available for the said period, were not legible due to flood water. Thus, though the Panchnama was drawn by the Range officers but the facts were recorded as per what was stated by the authorized signatory of the Assessee unit. The then Commissioner in his OIO No.07/Dem/Vapi/2009 has held that the Assessee had never intimated that the Cenvatable documents were lost in .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 



|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version