Contact us   Feedback   Annual Subscription   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

2015 (12) TMI 1181 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT

2015 (12) TMI 1181 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT - TMI - Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Held that:- The issue stands covered by the judgments delivered in Commissioner of Income-Tax, Central-I, Kolkata vs. Amardeep Singh Dhanjal [2013 (2) TMI 291 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT] and Commissioner of Income Tax, Central-III, Kolkata vs. Brijendra Gupta [2015 (7) TMI 451 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT] the manner in which the income was derived has also been disclosed and the assessee has thereafter paid the tax and the applicable .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

r advocate for the respondent/assessee that there is a typographical error in the question formulated at the time admission of the appeal. The word not appearing in the second line of the question has gone down by mistake, which is not disputed by Mr. Sinha, learned advocate for the appellant/revenue. Accordingly, the question is corrected and is as under: Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case the learned Tribunal has committed error in applying the provisions of the Explanat .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 



|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version