TMI Blog2015 (2) TMI 1069X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... DR, for the Respondent. ORDER The appellants has filed the Miscellaneous Application for appropriate orders/directions directing the respondents to issue Export Promotion Copies in respect of Shipping Bill Nos. 1457201, 1457202, 1457203, dated 2-3-2009, Shipping Bill Nos. 1468171, 1468155, dated 19-4-2005 and Shipping Bill Nos. 1472342, 1472416, dated 7-5-2005 in terms of Final Order No. C/A/50 ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... he correct value of the exported goods was to the tune of Rs. 1,03,73,212/- and the appellants were entitled for DEPB credit of Rs. 7,26,124.84. He also held the exported goods liable to confiscation and since the same were not available, redemption fine of Rs. 20 lakhs was imposed. Penalty of Rs. 10 lakhs was also imposed on the appellants under Section 114 of the Customs Act, 1962. The appellant ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... mental Representative did not have anything to say in defence except stating that he sought a report from the Customs in the matter, but the report has not been received. 5. We have considered the matter. It is evident that the Customs authorities have shown no regard to a quasi-judicial order of CESTAT which has neither been stayed nor set aside by any competent authority. The concerned Cus ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|