TMI Blog2015 (2) TMI 1069X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ies have not even bothered to send a report to the Departmental Representative. Such conduct of the concerned Customs authorities amounts to gross judicial indiscipline, gravely hurts the majesty of law, makes a mockery of rule of law, causes undue harassment to the appellants and shakes the public’s trust in the public authorities. While we do feel saddened, the fact remains that CESTAT has no le ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... Copies in respect of Shipping Bill Nos. 1457201, 1457202, 1457203, dated 2-3-2009, Shipping Bill Nos. 1468171, 1468155, dated 19-4-2005 and Shipping Bill Nos. 1472342, 1472416, dated 7-5-2005 in terms of Final Order No. C/A/50201/2014-CU(DB), dated 9-1-2014 passed by CESTAT in Appeal No. C/69/2009. 2. It is seen that the appellants exported various varieties of viscos shawls to Dubai during the ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... exported goods liable to confiscation and since the same were not available, redemption fine of ₹ 20 lakhs was imposed. Penalty of ₹ 10 lakhs was also imposed on the appellants under Section 114 of the Customs Act, 1962. The appellants filed appeal before CESTAT and CESTAT vide its Final Order dated 9-1-2014 found no merit in the impugned adjudication order of the Commissioner and the ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... n received. 5. We have considered the matter. It is evident that the Customs authorities have shown no regard to a quasi-judicial order of CESTAT which has neither been stayed nor set aside by any competent authority. The concerned Customs authorities have not even bothered to send a report to the Departmental Representative. Such conduct of the concerned Customs authorities amounts to gross ju ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
