Subscription   Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Articles Highlights TMI Notes SMS News Newsletters Calendar Imp. Links Database Experts Contact us More....
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

The ACIT, Circle-8, Ahmedabad Versus M/s Torrent Finance Ltd (Amalgamated With Torrent Pvt Ltd)

Levy of penalty u/s. 271(1)(c) - Assessee was not entitled to adjust the dividend income against the business loss - CIT(A) deleting addition - Held that:- CIT(A) while deleting the penalty has given a finding that Assessee had disclosed all the relevant facts regarding the computation of income, the income from business and the dividend earned on shares in the return of income and none of the particulars furnished by the Assessee were found to be false or inaccurate. He has further noted that t .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

I 1124 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT) has upheld the view of ld. CIT(A) as well as Tribunal that the irrespective of provisions contained in Section 56 of the Act and Explanation to 73, loss should be adjusted against such business income.

In view of the aforesaid facts and in the absence of any contrary binding decision brought to our notice by Revenue, we find no reason to interfere with the order of ld. CIT(A) and thus the ground of Revenue is dismissed. - Decided in favour of assessee. - .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

business of trading of shares. Assessee filed its return of income for A.Y. 1997-98 on 30.11.1997showing total loss of ₹ 11,76,10,593/- and thereafter Assessee filed revised statement of total income showing loss of ₹ 8,23,70,792/-. Subsequently the assessment was framed u/s. 143(3) vide order dated 13.03.2000 wherein the dividend income of ₹ 67,87,702/- was taxed under the head "income from other sources" and the business loss of ₹ 8,23,70,792/- was treated as .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

hereafter initiated penalty proceedings u/s. 271(1)(c) as he was of the view that Assessee was not legally entitled to set off the dividend income against the other losses. He therefore held that Assessee had furnished inaccurate particulars of income and that the Assessee was liable for penalty u/s. 271(1)(c) of the Act and therefore by order dated 30.03.2011 levied penalty of ₹ 29,18,711/-. Aggrieved by the order of A.O., Assessee carried the matter before ld. CIT(A) who vide order dated .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

erefore, prayed that the order of the Ld. Commissioner of income-Tax (Appeals)-XIV, Ahmedabad may be set-a-side and that of the order of the Assessing Officer be restored. 4. The Assessee in C.O has raised the following grounds:- 1. On the facts and in the circumstances of the respondent's case, the learned CIT(A) has erred in rejecting the relevant Ground of Appeal raised before him by the respondent company to the effect that the impugned order passed by the Assessing Officer u/s. 271(1)(c .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

and the set off of dividend income was denied by him as he was of the view that the set off was not permissible as per law and he therefore concluded that Assessee has furnished inaccurate particulars of income and levied penalty u/s. 271(1)(c) of the Act. In appeal, the penalty levied by A.O was deleted by ld. CIT(A) by holding as under:- 3.3 I have carefully considered the penalty order and the submission made by the appellant during the course of appellate proceedings. The appellant had shown .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

d in subsequent decision in the case of Spare Stock Holding Pvt. Ltd. (Supra) has held that the dividend income can be set off against the speculation loss and the appeal of the department against that order has been rejected by Gujarat High Court vide order dated 23/08/2011. A copy of the order has also been submitted by the appellant. I have carefully perused the said order of the Hon'ble High Court. The Hon'ble Court has discussed various aspects of the issue related to section 73 and .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ed in section 56 of the Act and Explanation to Section 73, loss should be adjusted against such business income. After consideration of all above facts, I am of the considered opinion that penalty u/s. 271(1)(c) is not eligible on the appellant. First of all, the appellant had disclosed all the relevant facts regarding the computation of income, the income from business and the dividend earned on shares in the return of income. None of the particulars furnished by appellant were found to be fals .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

jurisdictional High Court on the same issue that the income / loss can be adjusted against the dividend income irrespective of provisions of section 56 and 73. In these circumstances, the decision of Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Reliance Petro products Pvt. Ltd reported in 322 ITR 158 is clearly applicable. According to the decision, where there is no finding that any details were supplied by the assessee in its return of income found to be incorrect or erroneous or false there was n .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

merits, the issue is covered in favour of the Assessee by the decision of Hon'ble Gujarat High Court in the case of CIT vs. Sphere Stock Holding Pvt. Ltd. (in Tax Appeal No. 2583 of 2009 order dated 23.08.2011). He also placed on record the copy of the aforesaid decision. He thus supported the order of ld. CIT(A). 7. We have heard the rival submissions and perused the material on record. The issue in the present case is with respect to the levy of penalty u/s. 271(1)(c) of the Act on the gr .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

what is new what is new
  ↓     Latest Happenings     ↓  

News: Notification Issued For GST Actionable Claim On Branded Food Products

News: GST Refund - Blockage of Working Capital of Exporters - earlier also there was a normal blockage of funds for a period of 5-6 months at least

News: Clarification about Transition Credit - ₹ 1.27 lakh crore of credit of Central Excise and Service Tax was lying as closing balance as on 30th June, 2017 - claim of credit of ₹ 65,000 crore is not unexpected

Article: 20 Things You must know about E Way Bills in GST Law

Article: MISTAKES IN DRAFTING

Forum: Duty Drawback- Urgent

Highlight: The Customs and Central Excise Duties Drawback Rules, 2017 and All Industry Rates (AIRs) of Drawback related changes -reg. - Circular

Highlight: The definition of "subsidiary company" or "subsidiary" u/s 2(87) of the Companies Act, 2013 shall come into force w.e.f. 20-9-2017

Highlight: Central Government notified the All Industry Rates of Duty Drawback Schedule w.e.f. 1.10.2017 - Notification

Notification: All Industry Rates of Duty Drawback Schedule w.e.f. 1.10.2017

Circular: Investment by Foreign Portfolio Investors in Corporate Debt Securities Review

Notification: Exemptions on supply of services under UTGST Act

Notification: Rates for supply of services under UTGST Act

Notification: Exemptions on supply of services under IGST Act

Notification: Rates for supply of services under IGST Act

Notification: List of Exempted supply of services under the CGST Act

Notification: Rates for supply of services under CGST Act

Highlight: Acceptance of deposits by companies from its members - conditions relaxed in case of Specified IFSC Public company and a private company - Rule 3 amended

Notification: Rate of exchange of conversion of the foreign currency with effect from 8th September, 2017

News: Tax Payers Advised To Confirm Identities Of Income Tax Search Authorities

Notification: Amendment in Appendix 3 (SCOMET items) to Schedule- 2 of ITC (HS) Classification of Export and Import Items 2012

Forum: GST Invoice

Notification: The Customs and Central Excise Duties Drawback Rules, 2017

Circular: The Customs and Central Excise Duties Drawback Rules, 2017 and All Industry Rates (AIRs) of Drawback related changes -reg.

News: GST implementation smoother than expected: Jaitley

Forum: GST - TRAN1 - filed - Data uploaded with Remarks Processed with Error - Not coming in Electronic credit ledger - need suggession guidance

Forum: 3B mistake

Forum: Input tax credit

Forum: Excise duty credit on finished stock at additional place of business.

Forum: Due date of Filing TRAN-1

Highlight: Diversion of income at source - Joint venture agreement - 97% of the receipt transfer to M/s TRG Industries (P) Ltd. - scope of the agreement - it is diversion by overriding title - not taxable in the hands of assessee - HC

Highlight: Expenditure on eligible projects or schemes u/s 35AC - After 01.04.2017 the legislature desired to withdraw such deduction. - The Union legislature was competent to introduce such amendment - HC

Highlight: Transfer of trading assets at cost price, the profit component also stood transferred to the outgoing Directors, which otherwise belonged to the Company - the fact that AO has made the addition in the hands of the Directors would not make any difference - additions confirmed - HC

Highlight: The interest u/s 234B of the Act cannot go beyond the stage of S.245D(I) before the Settlement Commission - HC

Highlight: Galvanized iron pipe is a different commercial commodity than a iron pipe, therefore the activity of galvanization in our considered opinion amounts to manufacture - Deduction u/s 80-IB allowed - HC

Highlight: Penalty u/s 271C - non deduction of TDS on interest paid to sister concerns in terms of Section 194A - Levy of penalty confirmed - HC

Highlight: Disallowance of interest - reference to section 179 - The legislature has also recognised, that the doctrine of lifting of veil in the matter of tax dues is to be applied to prevent fraud etc. and not where the company has suffered despite its normal bona fide function. - HC

News: RBI Reference Rate for US $

Notification: Amendment in Notification No. S.O. 3118(E), dated the 3rd October, 2016

Highlight: Discount on ESOP to be allowed as business expenditure u/s 37(1), during the years of vesting on the basis of percentage of vesting during such period, subject to upward or downward adjustment at the time of exercise of option.

Notification: Central Government appoints the 20th September, 2017 as the date on which proviso to clause (87) of section 2 of the Companies Act 2013, shall come into force

Notification: Companies (Restriction on number of layers) Rules, 2017

Highlight: Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - additional income disclosure - surrender of income post survey u/s 133A - he disclosure made by the assessee is voluntary in nature, in the revised return - no penalty

Highlight: Reopening of assessment - notice u/s 148 issued on the directions of JCIT / CIT - a perusal of reasons for initiating reassessment proceedings clearly show that they are against the sprit of provisions u/s 147

Highlight: MAT - Adjustment to book profit - computation u/clause (f) of Explanation-1 to section 115JB(2) is to be made without resorting to the computation as contemplated u/s 14A r.w.Rule 8D of I.T. Rules.

Highlight: Addition on account of alleged suppression of service value received - the addition made simply believing the Form 26AS will be an arbitrary exercise of power which cannot be sustained

Notification: Exempts intra state supply of heavy water and nuclear fuels from DAE to NPCIL

Notification: Seeks to amend notification No. 12/2017-UTT(R) to exempt right to admission to the events organised under FIFA U-17 World Cup 2017

Notification: Seeks to amend notification No. 11/2017- UTT(R) to reduce CGST rate on specified supplies of Works Contract Services

Highlight: Liability to pay duty on import of software - Though no authorization was given by the appellant to DHL, it is an undisputed position that the software has, in fact, been ordered by the appellant and have been delivered to them by DHL - the appellant is to be considered as the importer



|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version