Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India. Com TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Acts / Rules Notifications Circulars Tariff/ ITC HSN Forms Case Laws Manuals Short Notes Articles SMS News Highlights
        Home        
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

Godfrey Prathap, Managing Partner Versus Commissioner of Central Excise, Customs and Service Tax Bangalore-I

2015 (3) TMI 1071 - CESTAT BENGLALORE

Denial of CHA License - Held that:- When, in response to a newspaper advertisement and PN 44/2001 dt. 28/02/2001, appellant had applied for temporary CHA licence, their Clerk Shri Joseph Francis was qualified to get a licence because (i) of his 5 yea .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

temporarily joined another licensed CHA M/s. Capithan Agencies and obtained a G-Card No.8/06 which was valid till 09/06/2007. The respondent had rejected the application for issue of temporary CHA licence on the grounds that (i) the delay in processi .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ication, obtained a valid G-Card showing his employment with Capithan Agencies. - facts are covered by the precedent decision of the Tribunal [2008 (4) TMI 55 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI] against the applicant - Decided against appellant. - Appeal(s) Involve .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

een that the appeal has been coming up for hearing in the past and on no occasion, the appellant was present. Appeal has been listed on 04/11/2013, 11/07/2014, 23/01/2015 and 06/03/2015. According to statutory limit, maximum number of adjournments th .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

Nevertheless the Tribunal has given 4 opportunities to the appellant to present his case which he has failed to utilise. 2. Heard the learned AR. He submits that the issue involved is whether the appellant should be given a CHA licence or not and in .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ner. He submits that the decision may be followed. 3. I have considered the submissions. The facts in brief are as under:- One 22/03/2001, when, in response to a newspaper advertisement and PN 44/2001 dt. 28/02/2001, appellant had applied for tempora .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

Discussion Forum
what is new what is new
 


Share:            

|| Home || About us || Feedback || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version