9911796707
TMI Blog2015 (3) TMI 1075X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ant is in appeal against the impugned order dated 11.7.2013 revoking their CHA license no. 02/CHALR/2004 dated 11.02.2004 and forfeiture of security deposit of Rs. 11,000/- and invoking penalty of Rs. 5,000/- under CHALR, 2004. 2. The facts of the case are that on receiving information on 09.05.2011 a container was stuffing in the cargo at ICD RAJSICO, Jodhpur. The container was interpreted and f ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... 62 of Rs. 5000/-was also imposed. Aggrieved from the said order, the appellant is before us. 3. The Ld. Counsel for the appellant submits that there are some lapses on the part of the appellant themselves. As they were required to supervise and train their employees but there was no knowledge of the appellant to stuff the goods declared by the exporter. To support this contention, he relied on th ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... and therefore they have violated Regulation 13(b), (d), (e) and 19(8) of CHAL Regulations, 2004. Therefore, the charges against the appellant have been proved by the Ld. Adjudicating Authority in the impugned order after going into the details of the case. Therefore, impugned order is to be upheld. 5. Heard the parties. Considered the submissions. 6. We do agree with the contention of the Ld. A ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
