New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

2015 (12) TMI 1301 - MADRAS HIGH COURT

2015 (12) TMI 1301 - MADRAS HIGH COURT - 2016 (331) E.L.T. 227 (Mad.) - Detention of goods - Smuggling of goods - Misdeclaration - Confiscation - Imposition of redemption fine - Held that:- Admittedly, the representation of the petitioner followed by the reminders have not been considered. The respondents are obligatory under law to take a decision for allowing re-export of the goods on payment of aforesaid fine and penalty. Not having done so, has caused serious prejudice and hardship to the pe .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

d cause release of the confiscated goods on payment fine and penalty for the purpose of re-export. - There is no denial with regard to the availability of the goods by the customs authorities even after a period of 5 years. The note issued by the Superintendent of Customs dated 21.09.2015 supports the claim of the petitioner. The inaction on the part of the authority is not explained properly in the counter affidavit. In this view also, the continued detention and non-release of the goods at the .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

alued at ₹ 11 97 885/-) and permit re-export thereof which is subject matter of adjudication proceedings before the first respondent in O.S. No. 58/07-INT / O.S. No. 712/07-AIU and O - in - O No. 03/2010-COMMR (AIR) dated 14.7.2010. 2. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the Officers of Air Intelligence Unit intercepted the petitioner, who arrived from Bangkok on 14.11.2007 on suspicion that he might be carrying high valued goods in commercial quantity. Personal search of .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

9 was challenged before CESTAT and as per order dated 30.07.2009 a denova adjudication proceedings had taken place with regard to the seizure of goods from the petitioner and ultimately, the order in original came to be passed on 14.7.2010 with the following conditions. "I. I order for confiscation of assorted precious/semi-precious stones totally weighing 19367 carats and re-valued at ₹ 11,97,885/- (Rupees Eleven Lakhs Ninety Seven Thousand Eight Hundred Eighty Five only) (CIF) under .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

of this Order. II. I order for confiscation of the material objects viz., 6 nos., of polythene covers and 69 nos., of smaller polythene pouches used for concealing the precious/semi-precious stones under Section 118(a) of the Customs Act, 1962. III. I impose a penalty of ₹ 2,00,000 (Rupees Two Lakhs only) under Section 112 of the Customs Act, 1962 on Shri Zakir Ali Khan for having rendered the aforesaid goods liable to confiscation." 4. Thereafter, within the stipulated time of 45 day .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ommunication dated 02.02.2015 marking a copy to the third respondent for the purpose of exercising the option of redemption for the re-export. The said communication dated 02.02.15 said to have been received by the authority was not taken into consideration. 6. According to the learned counsel for the petitioner, Section 125 of the Customs Act for the purpose of re-export provides redemption. Because of financial constraint, the petitioner was not in a position to redeem the seized goods within .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

to redeem the said semi-precious stones on payment of fine in terms of Sec.125 of Customs Act for the purpose of re-export. The petitioner has indicated to the respondents that he is willing and redeem to pay the fine and the penalty imposed so as to take the option of re-export of the goods under seizure / confiscation, the denial is improper and illegal. Hence, the learned counsel for the petitioner seeks appropriate direction for the purpose of redemption and for re-export. 7. The learned sta .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 



|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version