Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding


  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

TMI Blog

Home

2013 (8) TMI 931

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... of Sapient Corporation Ltd Vs. DCIT (2011 (5) TMI 499 - ITAT, DELHI ), wherein after discussing the case in detail, the Tribunal has held that the expenditure incurred on account of recruitment and training expenses cannot be said to be capital expenditure. The issue is thus covered in favour of the assessee. - ITA No.5660 /DEL/ 2011, C.O No. 42/Del/2012 - - - Dated:- 30-8-2013 - SHRI. G.D.AGRAWAL, VICE PRESIDENT And SHRI I.C. SUDHIR, JUDICIAL MEMBER Appellant BY : Smt. Renuka Jain Gupta, Sr. D.R Respondent BY : Shri Ajay Vohra, Adv Sh. Rohit Garg, Adv ORDER PER I. C. SUDHIR, JUDICIAL MEMBER: The revenue has questioned first appellate order on the following grounds:- 1. The Ld. CIT(A) erred in law an .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ts, its accessories and mobile repairing. The assessee claimed the amount of ₹ 7,71,04,765/- on account of advertisement expenses. The assessee was required to furnish the details of such expenses and also to explain as to why not the same may be disallowed and added to total income being incurred for business of enduring nature. The A.O did not agree with the explanation of the assessee that the word Spice has been substituted in place of the word Hot spots in the name of the assessee company w.e.f. 19/3/2009, hence no such expenses can be said to be related to brand building exercise of Spice Brand . The A.O held that most of the expenses are made for making brand value whether in the form of schemes of sales, promotion or adv .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ment and sales promotion, assessee had not acquired any fixed capital asset but these expenditures were incurred for earning better profits for facilitating assessee s operation of providing cellular mobile services. The action of the Ld. CIT (A) has been upheld with this finding that the Ld. CIT(A) had rightly allowed assessee s claim in respect of expenditure so incurred. Similar view has been expressed on the issue under almost similar facts in the remaining decisions in the case of ITO Vs. Spice Distribution Ltd (Supra) and Sapient Corporation Pvt. Ltd Vs. DCIT (Supra). The Ld. CIT (A) while deleting the addition in the present case has followed the decision of the Tribunal in the case of Spice Communications Ltd (Supra) and has also fo .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... es incurred by it do not give benefit of enduring nature, hence, it is not capital in nature. The A.O accordingly disallowed the claimed expenses of ₹ 67,00,746/-as capital in nature. The Ld. CIT (A) has, however, deleted the disallowance accepting the submission of the assessee that it had incurred certain expenses on training and recruitment for its employees in the normal course of its business. It was submitted that an employee appointed today is at liberty to leave the company just after serving it for few days of his appointment. The expenses were incurred by the assessee company to smoothly carry out its day to day business activities with the support of its employees in the normal course of its business. It does not give any e .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... find that the Ld. CIT(A) has rightly decided the issue in favour of the assessee with direction to delete the addition in question. The same is upheld. The Ground No-2 is accordingly rejected. 9. Consequently, appeal is dismissed. C.O No- 42/Del/2012 10. IN C.O No- 42/Del/2012, the assessee has objected the action of the Ld. CIT(A) in not adjudicating the alternative grounds raised before him whereby the assessee had questioned the action of the A.O in not allowing depreciation @ 25% on creation of intangible assets on brand building by advertisement and enduring benefit created due to recruitment and training of employees. These objections have become infructuous due to dismissal of the appeal preferred by the revenue against the .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates