Subscription   Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Articles Highlights TMI Notes SMS News Newsletters Calendar Imp. Links Database Experts Contact us More....
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

Assistant Commissioner, Anti-Evasion-II, Jaipur Versus M/s Anshu Jain, Sanjay Jain, M/s P.R. Rolling Mills Pvt Ltd, M/s Namarta Jain, Rohit Jain, Shri Lalit Kumar, M/s Vijay Industries, Jaipur

2015 (12) TMI 1477 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT

Levying of tax under the Rajasthan Tax on Entry of Motor Vehicles Into Local Area Act, 198 - Jurisdiction of AO - Held that:- when one statute make a reference to another Act then it cannot be said that provision of that Act cannot be read into it, and as observed earlier when all the provisions of Rajasthan Sales Tax Act, 1954 are made applicable mutatis mutandis to the provisions under the Act, therefore, the assessment order passed by the Assistant Commissioner, Anti Evasion Wing, though may .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ction to assess the assessee according to the area where one ordinarily resides or carries on business or provides any service, therefore, in the instant case assessment will have to be passed by the CTO in accordance with the place of residence or the place of business or place of providing service. In case the respondent-assessee is already assessed to tax by a particular CTO, the same officer would have jurisdiction to assess the assessee and in case some of the assessees are not assessed to .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

vision Petition No.88/2012, S.B. Sales Tax Revision Petition No.336/2008 - Dated:- 31-10-2015 - J. K. Ranka, J. For the Appellant : Ms. Meenal Ghiya for Mr. R.B. Mathur For the Respondent : Mr. Devendra Kumar, Mr. Dinesh Kumar, Mr. Alkesh Sharma and Mr. Gunjan Pathak JUDGMENT By the Court 1. These instant petitions involving common question of law is directed against the order of Rajasthan Tax Board and is decided by this common order for the sake of convenience and as agreed by the parties. The .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

allowing the appeal filed by the respondent and setting aside the order passed by the appellate authority by which the matter was only remanded to the assessing authority. ii) Whether in the facts and circumstances of the case the Rajasthan Tax Board has not acted illegally and perversely in allowing the appeal filed by the respondent and setting aside the order passed by the appellate authority holding that the Antievasion wing has no jurisdiction in the case of person and simply remanded the .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

d Dy. Commissioner (Appeals) as upheld by the learned Tax Board that the Anti Evasion authorities did not have any jurisdiction over the "persons" but would have jurisdiction only on "dealers" as per the notification No.3(a)(9)Jurs/Tax/CCT/97-1 dated 1.4.1997 issued by the Commissioner, Commercial Taxes and, therefore, the assessment order passed in the present matter would be a "nullity", is legally sustainable. vi) Whether in the facts and circumstances of the mat .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

sessing Officer that on verification of the information gathered from the Regional Transport Officer and on verification of declaration form ET-1 it was noticed that though the vehicles were purchased from outside the State of Rajasthan but brought into the State of Rajasthan without the declaration form ET-1 which according to the Assessing Officer was mandatory to be filled in and filed and non filing is in violation of the provisions laid down under the Rajasthan Tax on Entry of Motor Vehicle .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

nt rendered by the Division Bench of this Court in M/s. Ashapura Oil Centre v. State of Rajasthan & Another 2000 (2) WLN 408, held that tax was required to be levied and so also penalty and interest, which according to the Assessing Officer was mandatory. The matter was carried in appeal before the Dy. Commissioner (Appeals), who vide order dated 24.1.2004 while upholding the finding of the Assessing Officer, but came to the conclusion that the Assistant Commissioner, Commercial Tax Departme .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

herefore, no order could have been passed and the said order by the Assessing Officer was a nullity. The Tax Board accepted the contention raised on behalf of the assessees and quashed the assessment order itself holding that the authority who had passed assessment order had no jurisdiction. 4. Learned counsel for the Revenue drew attention of this court to the salient features under the Rajasthan Tax on Entry of Motor Vehicles Into Local Area Act, especially Section 2(1)(c), (e), (g), Section 3 .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

essment/reassessment, collection and enforcement of payment of tax required to be collected under this Act, and contended that when all the provisions of the Rajasthan Sales Tax Act are by and large applicable, and the Assessing Officers have power to make an assessment, if the provisions of the Act have been violated, then the very purpose of enacting the law has been defeated by the Tax Board which could not have been the purpose of the Act. She contended that the vehicles are being purchased .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ajasthan were used in the State but no payment of tax was made, and thus contended that the order of Assessing Officer was just and proper. Alternatively she contended that if at all the Anti Evasion Officer had no jurisdiction the assessment ought not to have been quashed but could have been remanded to the Officer having correct jurisdiction over the assessees and not to quash and set aside the order itself. She relied upon the judgment of this court in the case of Ashapura Oil Centre v. State .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

x Board has come to a correct conclusion and had rightly quashed the assessment as once there is no power to assess and when there is no jurisdiction to assess by the Assistant Commissioner, Commercial Tax Department, Anti Evasion Wing, the order is just and proper and is not required to be interfered with. 6. I have considered the arguments advanced by the counsel for the parties and have perused the impugned order. 7. On analysing the provisions contained under the Act of 1988 vis-a-vis the pr .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

brings or causes to be brought a motor vehicle into a local area from any place outside the State but not being a place outside the territory of the Union of India for use or sale therein; Sec. 2(d): "local area" means the area within the limits of,- (i) a panchayat established under the Rajasthan Panchayat Act, 1953 (Act No.21 of 1953); or (ii) a municipality established under the Rajasthan Municipalities Act, 1959 (Act No.38 of 1959); or (iii) a notified area committee or a cantonme .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ut excludes tractors; Sec. 2(f): "person" includes any company or association or body of individuals, whether incorporated or not, and also a Hindu Undivided Family, a firm, a local authority, the Government of any State or Union Territory; Sec. 3: Incidence of Tax.- (1) There shall be levied and collected a tax on the purchase value of a motor vehicle, an entry of which is effected into a local area for use or sale therein and which is liable for registration in the State under the Mo .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

Act, 1939 (Central Act 4 of 1939) for a period of fifteen months or more before the date on which it is liable to be registered in the State under the said Act. (2) The tax shall be payable by an importer,- (a) if he is a dealer registered or liable to be registered under the provisions of the RST Act, 1954 (Act No.29 of 1954), in the manner and within the time as tax on sales is payable by him under the said Act; and (b) if he is a person not covered by clause (a), on the date of entry of the .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

its local area. Sec. 6: Offences and penalties.- (1) Where any person liable to pay tax under this Act fails to comply with any of the provisions of the Act or rules made thereunder, then the assessing authority may, after giving such person a reasonable opportunity of being heard, by order in writing impose on him in addition to any tax payable, a sum by way of penalty not exceeding fifty per cent of the amount of tax. (2) Subject to the provisions of this Act, all the provisions relating to of .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

the rules made thereunder.- Subject to the provisions of this Act and the rules made thereunder, the authorities empowered to assess, reassess, collect and enforce payment of tax under the RST Act, 1954 (Act No.29 of 1954) shall assess, reassess, collect and enforce payment of tax including penalty or interest payable by an importer under this Act as if the tax, penalty or interest were payable under the said Act, and for this purpose they may exercise all or any of the powers assigned to them .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ts to import a motor vehicle for his personal use, may obtain a blank declaration Form ET-1 on application on simple paper to the Commercial Taxes Officer concerned of the area where he ordinarily resides on the payment of a fee of Rupees ten for each form. The counterfoil of the declaration form shall be retained by such person and its portions marked original and duplicate shall be produced before the officer in charge of the entry Check-post, who shall retain such original portion and return .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

The application to obtain Form ET-1 under sub-rule (1) shall be rejected if the Commercial Taxes Officer is satisfied that such form is not required for his bonafide personal use." 8. On conjoint reading of the above provisions and rules it clearly postulates that if a vehicle enters into the State of Rajasthan which is intended for being used in the State of Rajasthan, then one is required to pay tax on entry of motor vehicles as prescribed under the Act, an "importer" has been .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ority the Government of any State or Union Territory. Sec. 3(2)(b) as quoted hereinabove prescribes that the person who brings in vehicle is required to be assessed by the CTO of the area where one ordinarily resides or carries on any business or provides any service. Sec. 7 prescribes that the authorities empowered to assess, reassess, collect and enforce payment of tax under the RST Act, 1954 has been given the same powers to assess, reassess, collect and enforce payment of tax including penal .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

cerned of the area where one resides, and as rightly observed by the Assessing Officer, in all these cases the respondentassessees failed to furnish declaration form ET-1 and to pay the tax which was mandatory for a person importing the vehicle in the State of Rajasthan and was required to pay the tax as prescribed under this Act. In my view, once the finding recorded by the Assessing Officer after having information gathered from the Regional Transport Authority that the "importer" (a .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

the vehicle imported. In the instant case, the motor vehicles in question which is the subject matter of levy were admittedly imported by the assessees. Therefore, the case law relied upon by the assessees is of no assistance to them and the incidence of tax as provided in Section 3 of the Act is attracted towards the assessees. 22. Coming to the question of implication of Section 4 of the Act which deals with the reduction of tax liability, it can be observed that Section 4(2) is attracted onl .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ovided under the Rules. Having not applied and obtained it cannot be said that the assessees were right in claiming that they have fulfilled the prescribed conditions. That being the position, the reduction claimed by the assessees in the writ petition under Section 4(2) of the Act is not applicable to them. Another aspect regarding reduction is that it could be made available if applied. Admittedly, the Commercial Taxes Officer was not moved for it. If the petitioners have not asked for reducti .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

tion of penalty and interest. Both the parties have relied upon Khemka & Co. (Agencies) Pvt. Ltd. v. State of Maharashtra [1975 35 S.T.C. 571]. To appreciate the contention of the parties, we reproduce Section 6 of the Act: 6. Offences and penalties: (1) Where any person liable to pay tax under this Act fails to comply with any of the provisions of the Act or rules made thereunder, then the assessing authority may, after giving such person a reasonable opportunity of being heard, by order in .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

sessment, reassessment, collection or enforcement of payment as if the tax under this Act were a tax under the said Act. Penalty is clearly provided directly under Section 6(1) of the Act. Under Section 6(2) of the Act, interest has been provided by substitution of the Rajasthan Sales Tax Act. When one Statute makes a reference to another Act, then it cannot be said that provision of that Act cannot be read into it. When provision of Rajasthan Sales Tax Act are read, we find that the liability o .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

assessees. We have already found out that the assessees are liable to pay tax. No reduction can be claimed by them. They are liable to pay penalty and interest. These findings result into the total negation of relief to the assessees in the writ petition." 10. Taking into consideration the salient provisions of the Act noted and analysed earlier including Sections 6 and 7, and so also Rule 4, and considering the judgment of the Division Bench of this court in the case of Ashapura Oil Centr .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ll times to come. At least when liability under the Act is fastened on an assessee who imports vehicle into the State of Rajasthan for personal use and such intention is to use the vehicle for all times to come, the provisions of the Act cannot be made redundant as held by the Tax Board that the Assistant Commissioner, Anti Evasion Wing had no jurisdiction. It may be that the Assistant Commissioner, Anti Evasion Wing had no jurisdiction but that may not be sufficient to quash and set aside the a .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

are attracted and violated. The judgment of the Division Bench in the case of Ashapura Oil Centre (supra) was duly considered by the Assessing Officer as well as the Dy. Commissioner (Appeals), however the Tax Board for the reasons best known to it has not at all referred to and has not considered the judgment of the Division Bench (supra) which ought to have been considered by the Tax Board as it is the final fact finding authority. 11. Having held so, in my view the CTO under Section 3(2)(b) .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

what is new what is new
  ↓     bird's eye view     ↓  


|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version