2016 (1) TMI 107

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ran, Adv ORDER Per Archana Wadhwa All the three appeals filed by the Revenue are being disposed of by a common order. 2. After hearing both the sides duly represented by Shri Pakshi Rajan, Asst. Commissioner (AR) and Shri V. Ravindran, Advocate, I find that the appellant is a 100% EOU and was availing the benefit of the CENVAT credit of tax paid on the input services availed by them. 3. The a .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ppeals vide his Orders-in-Appeal. The said orders were reviewed by the Committee of Commissioners and were accepted by the Revenue. As a result, the Assistant Commissioner vide his orders granted refund. The said orders were again reviewed by the Department who decided to file appeals before the Commissioner (Appeals) on an altogether different ground i.e. the appellant who is a 100% EOU have been .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... the proceedings by including some fresh grounds in their memorandum of appeal before the Commissioner (Appeals) or in the memorandum of appeal before the Tribunal. Even though it is the case of assessee that no common CENVATable services were used by them and even though I find that the Revenue in their memorandum of appeals have not referred to any such services, the appeals of the Revenue can be .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X